qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Daniel P. Berrangé" <berrange@redhat.com>
To: David Edmondson <dme@dme.org>
Cc: Florian Weimer <fweimer@redhat.com>,
	Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com>,
	"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
	Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>,
	qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Cleber Rosa <crosa@redhat.com>,
	Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 1/4] docs: add a table showing x86-64 ABI compatibility levels
Date: Tue, 2 Feb 2021 12:23:42 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210202122342.GC4168502@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cunv9balsck.fsf@dme.org>

On Tue, Feb 02, 2021 at 09:41:15AM +0000, David Edmondson wrote:
> On Monday, 2021-02-01 at 15:36:03 GMT, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> 
> > It is useful to know which CPUs satisfy each x86-64 ABI
> > compatibility level, when dealing with guest OS that require
> > something newer than the baseline ABI.
> >
> > These ABI levels are defined in:
> >
> >   https://gitlab.com/x86-psABIs/x86-64-ABI/
> >
> > and supported by GCC, CLang, GLibC and more.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com>
> > ---
> >  MAINTAINERS                        |   2 +-
> >  docs/system/cpu-models-x86-abi.csv | 121 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >  docs/system/cpu-models-x86.rst.inc |  18 +++++
> >  3 files changed, 140 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >  create mode 100644 docs/system/cpu-models-x86-abi.csv
> >
> > diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
> > index fbb228ef2b..bb8d60c458 100644
> > --- a/MAINTAINERS
> > +++ b/MAINTAINERS
> > @@ -344,7 +344,7 @@ F: tests/tcg/i386/
> >  F: tests/tcg/x86_64/
> >  F: hw/i386/
> >  F: disas/i386.c
> > -F: docs/system/cpu-models-x86.rst.inc
> > +F: docs/system/cpu-models-x86*
> >  T: git https://gitlab.com/ehabkost/qemu.git x86-next
> >  
> >  Xtensa TCG CPUs
> > diff --git a/docs/system/cpu-models-x86-abi.csv b/docs/system/cpu-models-x86-abi.csv
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 0000000000..4565e6a535
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/docs/system/cpu-models-x86-abi.csv
> > @@ -0,0 +1,121 @@
> > +Model,baseline,v2,v3,v4
> > +486,,,,
> > +486-v1,,,,
> > +Broadwell,✅,✅,✅,
> > +Broadwell-IBRS,✅,✅,✅,
> > +Broadwell-noTSX,✅,✅,✅,
> > +Broadwell-noTSX-IBRS,✅,✅,✅,
> 
> Would it be useful to add an explicit negative mark (✘) in the slots
> where the CPU does not satisfy the requirement? It makes reading the
> table a little easier (my opinion, of course).

I felt it was clearer to only show the positive case. Since the
ABI levels are additive, you can count the ticks at a glance to see
the ABI level achieved. Also this CSV file isn't really meant to
be seen by users directly. It is just data input that gets rendered
into an HTML table that looks like this:

  https://berrange.gitlab.io/-/qemu/-/jobs/1001700036/artifacts/public/system/target-i386.html#recommendations-for-kvm-cpu-model-configuration-on-x86-hosts

Regards,
Daniel
-- 
|: https://berrange.com      -o-    https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :|
|: https://libvirt.org         -o-            https://fstop138.berrange.com :|
|: https://entangle-photo.org    -o-    https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|



  reply	other threads:[~2021-02-02 12:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-02-01 15:36 [PATCH RFC 0/4] target/i386/cpu: introduce new CPU models for x86-64 ABI levels Daniel P. Berrangé
2021-02-01 15:36 ` [PATCH RFC 1/4] docs: add a table showing x86-64 ABI compatibility levels Daniel P. Berrangé
2021-02-01 16:33   ` Florian Weimer
2021-02-01 17:17     ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2021-02-01 16:53   ` Peter Maydell
2021-02-01 17:19     ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2021-02-02  9:06     ` Florian Weimer
2021-02-01 18:28   ` Eduardo Habkost
2021-02-02 12:24     ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2021-02-02  9:41   ` David Edmondson
2021-02-02 12:23     ` Daniel P. Berrangé [this message]
2021-02-02 12:43       ` David Edmondson
2021-02-01 15:36 ` [PATCH RFC 2/4] target/i386: define CPU models to model x86-64 ABI levels Daniel P. Berrangé
2021-02-02  9:46   ` David Edmondson
2021-02-02 12:32     ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2021-02-02 12:50       ` David Edmondson
2021-02-02 12:54         ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2021-02-01 15:36 ` [PATCH RFC 3/4] NOT FOR MERGE target/i386: use x86-64-abi1 CPU model as default on x86_64 Daniel P. Berrangé
2021-02-01 15:36 ` [PATCH RFC 4/4] NOT FOR MERGE: script for CPU model stuff related to x86-64 ABI levels Daniel P. Berrangé

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210202122342.GC4168502@redhat.com \
    --to=berrange@redhat.com \
    --cc=crosa@redhat.com \
    --cc=dme@dme.org \
    --cc=ehabkost@redhat.com \
    --cc=fweimer@redhat.com \
    --cc=mst@redhat.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=richard.henderson@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).