From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.6 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_INVALID, DKIM_SIGNED,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D7B2C433DB for ; Tue, 2 Feb 2021 16:54:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ECCDE64F72 for ; Tue, 2 Feb 2021 16:54:03 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org ECCDE64F72 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Received: from localhost ([::1]:54390 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l6ywE-0000ZI-QQ for qemu-devel@archiver.kernel.org; Tue, 02 Feb 2021 11:54:02 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:50656) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l6ySi-0007fI-Rk for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 02 Feb 2021 11:23:33 -0500 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com ([216.205.24.124]:23050) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l6ySg-00069e-Qt for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 02 Feb 2021 11:23:32 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1612283010; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=BlDnZWvrK0Zd+X3ytD/nlHlHN1cR0LzvC2x7au4OCQE=; b=QtgZXvm4AN7CbCxUv4akLEBDYSD3D7ABxfTE4FBDlrLWO9UWuTVZxpya66M4E1pcqvgiEz d2CuBOtKN20hyuLngiscDOMT7apoCJVqS/8B3XlsseTPSFmIUK6A5lgJ4wT9SPOsR6ohkN gHuUVM/4qJ1skXHZAfNqCAhgtJFe3pc= Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-577-k8D1oXmvPSeRJDbR1UIusQ-1; Tue, 02 Feb 2021 11:23:27 -0500 X-MC-Unique: k8D1oXmvPSeRJDbR1UIusQ-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx06.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.16]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7F46585C87F; Tue, 2 Feb 2021 16:23:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from merkur.fritz.box (ovpn-112-19.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.112.19]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A49C65C5FC; Tue, 2 Feb 2021 16:23:20 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 2 Feb 2021 17:23:19 +0100 From: Kevin Wolf To: Eric Blake Subject: Re: iotest failures in head [was: [PATCH v4 00/16] 64bit block-layer: part I] Message-ID: <20210202162319.GG5184@merkur.fritz.box> References: <20201211183934.169161-1-vsementsov@virtuozzo.com> <81abe7dc-6053-72d2-ddf7-352dc21e75b6@redhat.com> <9e71568c-ce4a-f844-fbd3-a4a59f850d74@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <9e71568c-ce4a-f844-fbd3-a4a59f850d74@redhat.com> X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.16 Authentication-Results: relay.mimecast.com; auth=pass smtp.auth=CUSA124A263 smtp.mailfrom=kwolf@redhat.com X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Received-SPF: pass client-ip=216.205.24.124; envelope-from=kwolf@redhat.com; helo=us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com X-Spam_score_int: -31 X-Spam_score: -3.2 X-Spam_bar: --- X-Spam_report: (-3.2 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.386, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: fam@euphon.net, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy , qemu-block@nongnu.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, mreitz@redhat.com, stefanha@redhat.com, den@openvz.org Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" Am 02.02.2021 um 17:13 hat Eric Blake geschrieben: > On 2/1/21 8:56 PM, Eric Blake wrote: > > > I had planned to send a pull request for this series today, but ran into > > a snag. Without this series applied, './check -qcow2' fails 030, 185, > > and 297. > > 297 appears to be fixed once Kevin's pull request lands (well, that may > be needing a v2). 185 appears to be just a whitespace difference that > missed fixing in 362ef77f9 and similar: > > --- /home/eblake/qemu/tests/qemu-iotests/185.out > +++ 185.out.bad > @@ -89,7 +89,7 @@ > 'format': 'IMGFMT', > 'sync': 'full', > 'speed': 65536, > - 'x-perf': { 'max-chunk': 65536 } } } > + 'x-perf': {'max-chunk': 65536} } } > > 030 is a bit tougher to figure out. > > 030 fail [09:40:32] [09:40:48] 16.9s (last: 15.4s) failed, > exit status 1 > --- /home/eblake/qemu/tests/qemu-iotests/030.out > +++ 030.out.bad > @@ -1,5 +1,45 @@ > -........................... > +WARNING:qemu.machine:qemu received signal 11; command: So some qemu process segfaulted. Did you have a look at the resulting coredump? Kevin