qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Daniel P. Berrangé" <berrange@redhat.com>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: "Alex Bennée" <alex.bennee@linaro.org>,
	"Thomas Huth" <thuth@redhat.com>,
	"Philippe Mathieu-Daudé" <philmd@redhat.com>,
	"Wainer dos Santos Moschetta" <wainersm@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] fix build failures from incorrectly skipped container build jobs
Date: Mon, 8 Feb 2021 17:22:56 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210208172256.GM1141037@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210208163339.1159514-1-berrange@redhat.com>

On Mon, Feb 08, 2021 at 04:33:36PM +0000, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> This series fixes a problem with our gitlab CI rules that cause
> container builds to be skipped. See the commit description in the
> first patch for the details on this problem.
> 
> The overall result of this series though is a small increase in overall
> pipeline time.
> 
> Previously
> 
>  - When container jobs are skipped: approx 1hr 5 mins
>  - When container jobs are run, cached by docker: approx 1hr 15 mins
>  - When container jobs are run, not cached by docker: approx 1hr 30 mins
> 
> With this series applied the first scenario no longer exists, so
> all piplines are either 1hr 15 or 1hr 30 depending on whether the
> container phase is skipped.

I mean to say the biggest problem I see is the cross-win64-system
job. This consumes 1 hour 5 minutes all on its own. It is at least
15 minutes longer that every other job AFAICT. So no matter how
well we parallelize stuff, 1 hr 5 is a hard lower limit on pipeline
duration right now.

We might want to consider how to split the win64 job or cut down
what it does in some way ?


Regards,
Daniel
-- 
|: https://berrange.com      -o-    https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :|
|: https://libvirt.org         -o-            https://fstop138.berrange.com :|
|: https://entangle-photo.org    -o-    https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|



  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-02-08 22:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-02-08 16:33 [PATCH 0/3] fix build failures from incorrectly skipped container build jobs Daniel P. Berrangé
2021-02-08 16:33 ` [PATCH 1/3] gitlab: always build container images Daniel P. Berrangé
2021-02-09  6:37   ` Thomas Huth
2021-02-09  9:58     ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2021-02-10 11:17       ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2021-02-16 12:43         ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2021-02-16 13:02           ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2021-02-16 13:15             ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2021-02-08 16:33 ` [PATCH 2/3] gitlab: add fine grained job deps for all build jobs Daniel P. Berrangé
2021-02-09  6:39   ` Thomas Huth
2021-02-08 16:33 ` [PATCH 3/3] gitlab: fix inconsistent indentation Daniel P. Berrangé
2021-02-08 17:20   ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2021-02-08 17:22 ` Daniel P. Berrangé [this message]
2021-02-08 18:08   ` [PATCH 0/3] fix build failures from incorrectly skipped container build jobs Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2021-02-08 18:12     ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2021-02-09  6:01       ` Stefan Weil
2021-02-09  6:55         ` Thomas Huth
2021-02-09  9:53         ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2021-02-16 10:39 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210208172256.GM1141037@redhat.com \
    --to=berrange@redhat.com \
    --cc=alex.bennee@linaro.org \
    --cc=philmd@redhat.com \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=thuth@redhat.com \
    --cc=wainersm@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).