From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.1 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_INVALID, DKIM_SIGNED,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, MENTIONS_GIT_HOSTING,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 626BCC433E0 for ; Wed, 10 Feb 2021 16:59:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7345164DF6 for ; Wed, 10 Feb 2021 16:59:52 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 7345164DF6 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Received: from localhost ([::1]:51926 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l9sqF-0000GS-As for qemu-devel@archiver.kernel.org; Wed, 10 Feb 2021 11:59:51 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:43956) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l9sgJ-0007na-UL for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 10 Feb 2021 11:49:35 -0500 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com ([216.205.24.124]:52884) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l9sgH-0002DG-Rj for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 10 Feb 2021 11:49:35 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1612975773; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=v5S0xU7gHrocv16yXSkfUqCfPChSMYpgAdmaPF4TTBo=; b=YMhoPh71FZlsH6icCZn5WVHWMOY8K/0WH60PtLNU+0CtctUCNv41KIxGhV3XJhP4tYCJ06 Pz5/BXi4MzklmkIkZEi1Gr2rnX66yuVuiq1ILB76EavbSICocngx+1Ar5xfegDYIH+zN6N faAg9923TdrlpIxQ4GtvPU2B17tQbVY= Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-7-1CdLBZWiMViuLBB6KvgW_g-1; Wed, 10 Feb 2021 11:49:25 -0500 X-MC-Unique: 1CdLBZWiMViuLBB6KvgW_g-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx04.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.14]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EC26F8030CD; Wed, 10 Feb 2021 16:49:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from redhat.com (ovpn-115-94.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.115.94]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C27EB5D9D0; Wed, 10 Feb 2021 16:49:22 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2021 16:49:19 +0000 From: Daniel =?utf-8?B?UC4gQmVycmFuZ8Op?= To: Doug Evans Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/3] Message-ID: <20210210164919.GL1240644@redhat.com> References: <20210203233539.1990032-1-dje@google.com> <20210204100349.GF549438@redhat.com> <20210210093102.GB1240644@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.14.6 (2020-07-11) X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.14 Authentication-Results: relay.mimecast.com; auth=pass smtp.auth=CUSA124A263 smtp.mailfrom=berrange@redhat.com X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Received-SPF: pass client-ip=216.205.24.124; envelope-from=berrange@redhat.com; helo=us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com X-Spam_score_int: -33 X-Spam_score: -3.4 X-Spam_bar: --- X-Spam_report: (-3.4 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.568, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: Daniel =?utf-8?B?UC4gQmVycmFuZ8Op?= Cc: Samuel Thibault , QEMU Developers Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" On Wed, Feb 10, 2021 at 08:31:40AM -0800, Doug Evans wrote: > On Wed, Feb 10, 2021 at 1:31 AM Daniel P. Berrangé > wrote: > > > On Tue, Feb 09, 2021 at 06:16:57PM -0800, Doug Evans wrote: > > > On Thu, Feb 4, 2021 at 10:25 AM Doug Evans wrote: > > > > > > > On Thu, Feb 4, 2021 at 2:03 AM Daniel P. Berrangé > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > >> On Wed, Feb 03, 2021 at 03:35:36PM -0800, dje--- via wrote: > > > >> > Add support for ipv6 host forwarding > > > >> > > > > >> > This patchset takes the original patch from Maxim, > > > >> > https://www.mail-archive.com/qemu-devel@nongnu.org/msg569573.html > > > >> > and updates it. > > > >> > > > > >> > New option: -ipv6-hostfwd > > > >> > > > > >> > New commands: ipv6_hostfwd_add, ipv6_hostfwd_remove > > > >> > > > > >> > These are the ipv6 equivalents of their ipv4 counterparts. > > > >> > > > >> Before I noticed this v3, I send a reply to your v2 sugesting > > > >> that we don't need to add any new commands/options. We can > > > >> use existing inet_parse() helper function to parse the address > > > >> info and transparently support IPv4/6 in the existing commands > > > >> and options. This matches normal practice elsewhere in QEMU > > > >> for IP dual stack. > > > >> > > > > > > > > I'm all for this, fwiw. > > > > > > > > > > > > > I should say I'm all for not adding new commands/options. > > > Looking at inet_parse() it cannot be used as-is. > > > The question then becomes: Will refactoring it buy enough? > > > > What's the problem your hitting with inet_parse ? > > > > > First, this is the inet_parse() function we're talking about, right? > > int inet_parse(InetSocketAddress *addr, const char *str, Error **errp) > > https://gitlab.com/qemu-project/qemu/-/blob/master/util/qemu-sockets.c#L618 Yes, that's right. Regards, Daniel -- |: https://berrange.com -o- https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :| |: https://libvirt.org -o- https://fstop138.berrange.com :| |: https://entangle-photo.org -o- https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|