From: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
To: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] monitor/qmp: Stop processing requests when shutdown is requested
Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2021 14:58:44 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210215135844.GP7226@merkur.fritz.box> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87k0r9y01g.fsf@dusky.pond.sub.org>
Am 15.02.2021 um 13:42 hat Markus Armbruster geschrieben:
> Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com> writes:
>
> > Am 15.02.2021 um 13:09 hat Markus Armbruster geschrieben:
> >> Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com> writes:
> >>
> >> > monitor_qmp_dispatcher_co() used to check whether shutdown is requested
> >>
> >> "used to": until when?
> >
> > Until right before this patch. Do you prefer present tense to describe
> > the old state?
>
> I've done it both ways. I think present tense works better for me.
> Case in point: I wasn't confident I read your commit message correctly,
> so I asked.
I guess I can just add "Before this patch, ..." to clarify.
> > Also, does your Tested-by imply that you expect someone else to merge
> > this series? I'm planning to send a pull request today, so if that was
> > your intention, I can include it there.
>
> I didn't mean to imply anything beyond "I ran my reproducer, and your
> patches fix it."
>
> I don't mind you including the fixes in your pull request. I also
> don't mind doing a pull request for your fixes. Up to you!
Ok, if you don't mind either way, I'll just fix up the commit message
and include it.
I just asked because it has happened before that everyone was waiting
for someone else to merge a patch. So I made it a habit to ask when a
maintainer replies with some kind of approval without mentioning that
they queued the patch, because that could be a sign that they expect it
to go through a different tree.
Kevin
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-02-15 14:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-02-12 17:20 [PATCH 0/2] monitor: Shutdown fixes Kevin Wolf
2021-02-12 17:20 ` [PATCH 1/2] monitor: Fix assertion failure on shutdown Kevin Wolf
2021-02-12 17:20 ` [PATCH 2/2] monitor/qmp: Stop processing requests when shutdown is requested Kevin Wolf
2021-02-15 12:09 ` Markus Armbruster
2021-02-15 12:28 ` Kevin Wolf
2021-02-15 12:42 ` Markus Armbruster
2021-02-15 13:58 ` Kevin Wolf [this message]
2021-02-15 14:22 ` Markus Armbruster
2021-02-15 12:16 ` [PATCH 0/2] monitor: Shutdown fixes Markus Armbruster
2021-02-15 12:44 ` Markus Armbruster
2021-06-29 9:14 ` Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2021-07-06 15:32 ` Markus Armbruster
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210215135844.GP7226@merkur.fritz.box \
--to=kwolf@redhat.com \
--cc=armbru@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).