qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
To: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
Cc: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>,
	qemu-s390x@nongnu.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org,
	Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] pc-bios/s390-ccw: Use memory barriers in virtio code
Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2021 12:47:57 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210216124757.4eb664e9.cohuck@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210216110056.1228582-1-thuth@redhat.com>

On Tue, 16 Feb 2021 12:00:56 +0100
Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com> wrote:

> According to the virtio specification, a memory barrier should be
> used before incrementing the idx field in the "available" ring.
> So far, we did not do this in the s390-ccw bios yet, but recently
> Peter Maydell saw problems with the s390-ccw bios when running
> the qtests on an aarch64 host (the bios panic'ed with the message:
> "SCSI cannot report LUNs: response VS RESP=09"), which could
> maybe be related to the missing memory barriers. Thus let's add
> those barriers now. Since we've only seen the problem on TCG so far,
> a "bcr 14,0" should be sufficient here to trigger the tcg_gen_mb()
> in the TCG translate code.
> 
> (Note: The virtio spec also talks about using a memory barrier
> *after* incrementing the idx field, but if I understood correctly
> this is only required when using notification suppression - which
> we don't use in the s390-ccw bios here)
> 
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
> ---
>  pc-bios/s390-ccw/virtio-net.c | 1 +
>  pc-bios/s390-ccw/virtio.c     | 1 +
>  pc-bios/s390-ccw/virtio.h     | 2 ++
>  3 files changed, 4 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/pc-bios/s390-ccw/virtio-net.c b/pc-bios/s390-ccw/virtio-net.c
> index 2fcb0a58c5..25598a7a97 100644
> --- a/pc-bios/s390-ccw/virtio-net.c
> +++ b/pc-bios/s390-ccw/virtio-net.c
> @@ -127,6 +127,7 @@ int recv(int fd, void *buf, int maxlen, int flags)
>  
>      /* Mark buffer as available to the host again */
>      rxvq->avail->ring[rxvq->avail->idx % rxvq->num] = id;
> +    virtio_mb();
>      rxvq->avail->idx = rxvq->avail->idx + 1;
>      vring_notify(rxvq);
>  
> diff --git a/pc-bios/s390-ccw/virtio.c b/pc-bios/s390-ccw/virtio.c
> index ab49840db8..fb9687f9b3 100644
> --- a/pc-bios/s390-ccw/virtio.c
> +++ b/pc-bios/s390-ccw/virtio.c
> @@ -154,6 +154,7 @@ void vring_send_buf(VRing *vr, void *p, int len, int flags)
>  
>      /* Chains only have a single ID */
>      if (!(flags & VRING_DESC_F_NEXT)) {
> +        virtio_mb();

I think you need to also need barriers for changes to the buffers, as
the spec talks about "manipulating the descriptor table".

>          vr->avail->idx++;
>      }
>  }
> diff --git a/pc-bios/s390-ccw/virtio.h b/pc-bios/s390-ccw/virtio.h
> index 19fceb6495..6ac65482a9 100644
> --- a/pc-bios/s390-ccw/virtio.h
> +++ b/pc-bios/s390-ccw/virtio.h
> @@ -271,6 +271,8 @@ struct VirtioCmd {
>  };
>  typedef struct VirtioCmd VirtioCmd;
>  
> +#define virtio_mb()  asm volatile("bcr 14,0" : : : "memory")

The bios is built for z900, so you probably need a bcr15 here?

> +
>  bool vring_notify(VRing *vr);
>  int drain_irqs(SubChannelId schid);
>  void vring_send_buf(VRing *vr, void *p, int len, int flags);



  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-02-16 11:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-02-16 11:00 [PATCH] pc-bios/s390-ccw: Use memory barriers in virtio code Thomas Huth
2021-02-16 11:43 ` Peter Maydell
2021-02-16 11:47   ` Thomas Huth
2021-02-16 11:47 ` Cornelia Huck [this message]
2021-02-16 14:21   ` Thomas Huth
2021-02-16 14:30     ` Cornelia Huck
2021-02-16 14:32       ` Peter Maydell
2021-02-16 14:35         ` Thomas Huth
2021-02-16 14:37           ` Peter Maydell
2021-02-16 14:49             ` Cornelia Huck
2021-02-16 14:40 ` Halil Pasic
2021-02-16 15:17   ` Cornelia Huck
2021-02-16 16:15   ` Thomas Huth
2021-02-16 16:44     ` Peter Maydell
2021-02-16 17:11     ` Halil Pasic
2021-02-17  4:31     ` Richard Henderson
2021-02-17 11:15       ` Peter Maydell
2021-02-17 15:11         ` Richard Henderson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210216124757.4eb664e9.cohuck@redhat.com \
    --to=cohuck@redhat.com \
    --cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=qemu-s390x@nongnu.org \
    --cc=thuth@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).