From: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
To: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Cc: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>,
Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>,
qemu-s390x <qemu-s390x@nongnu.org>,
QEMU Developers <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] pc-bios/s390-ccw: Use memory barriers in virtio code
Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2021 15:49:57 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210216154957.1cc0afdf.cohuck@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAFEAcA8H=ixwj6PtGSDtEuiADY775o68gk8DZ5PrwOjftqtWtg@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, 16 Feb 2021 14:37:22 +0000
Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org> wrote:
> On Tue, 16 Feb 2021 at 14:35, Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com> wrote:
> >
> > On 16/02/2021 15.32, Peter Maydell wrote:
> > > On Tue, 16 Feb 2021 at 14:30, Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com> wrote:
> > >> Step 4 in "2.7.13 Supplying Buffers to The Device":
> > >>
> > >> "The driver performs a suitable memory barrier to ensure the device
> > >> sees the updated descriptor table and available ring before the next
> > >> step."
> > >
> > > I thought that my first time through the spec as well, but
> > > I think the whole of section 2.7 is dealing with "packed virtqueues",
> > > which have to be explicitly negotiated and which I don't think
> > > the s390-ccw code is doing.
2.7 is split, 2.8 packed (at least in my built-from-git version; maybe
I should have mentioned that :)
> >
> > Right. I think the s390-ccw code is still based on virtio v1.0, that's why I
> > also only looked at that version of the spec.
Yes, the bios code is using split.
> I think the ideal would be to find somebody who's really well
> acquainted with the virtio spec (MST?) and ask them to have
> a quick look-over the s390-ccw code to say where it needs
> changes... The fact that this patch doesn't completely fix
> the bug leaves me suspicious that we're missing something in
> our readings of the spec.
Unfortunately, the bios virtio code is not that easy to follow :/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-02-16 14:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-02-16 11:00 [PATCH] pc-bios/s390-ccw: Use memory barriers in virtio code Thomas Huth
2021-02-16 11:43 ` Peter Maydell
2021-02-16 11:47 ` Thomas Huth
2021-02-16 11:47 ` Cornelia Huck
2021-02-16 14:21 ` Thomas Huth
2021-02-16 14:30 ` Cornelia Huck
2021-02-16 14:32 ` Peter Maydell
2021-02-16 14:35 ` Thomas Huth
2021-02-16 14:37 ` Peter Maydell
2021-02-16 14:49 ` Cornelia Huck [this message]
2021-02-16 14:40 ` Halil Pasic
2021-02-16 15:17 ` Cornelia Huck
2021-02-16 16:15 ` Thomas Huth
2021-02-16 16:44 ` Peter Maydell
2021-02-16 17:11 ` Halil Pasic
2021-02-17 4:31 ` Richard Henderson
2021-02-17 11:15 ` Peter Maydell
2021-02-17 15:11 ` Richard Henderson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210216154957.1cc0afdf.cohuck@redhat.com \
--to=cohuck@redhat.com \
--cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
--cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-s390x@nongnu.org \
--cc=thuth@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).