From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.5 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_INVALID, DKIM_SIGNED,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E027C433DB for ; Tue, 16 Feb 2021 17:52:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9B00F64DAF for ; Tue, 16 Feb 2021 17:52:37 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 9B00F64DAF Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Received: from localhost ([::1]:45650 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lC4Wa-0003UC-Jo for qemu-devel@archiver.kernel.org; Tue, 16 Feb 2021 12:52:36 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:51306) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lC4VO-0002ug-0k for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 16 Feb 2021 12:51:22 -0500 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com ([63.128.21.124]:57454) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lC4VI-00038T-3r for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 16 Feb 2021 12:51:21 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1613497874; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=+tyxUS8yK/U/81cDPBP0ohl6NmXuvQnnSkeMxFUH7xQ=; b=fj2tBizO1V0ETXyqNB4oxd7hBiSzRK5npywPKHJHUQxrwLy1To8YBqkXP3nyvpc90h1/vU lZW5y7fRYz2fO92kC/VoiCgt6OaOsrxhYN0VoPftN0wATu7xG+68/s1YkHN4UxLiGuxyTV 2WC4dHPTIybR8LMIMBG+2g6B4krzmyE= Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-530-aHPrGPS3Oz-7zCL4fK70sw-1; Tue, 16 Feb 2021 12:51:12 -0500 X-MC-Unique: aHPrGPS3Oz-7zCL4fK70sw-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx08.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.23]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B3CE26DD24; Tue, 16 Feb 2021 17:51:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from merkur.fritz.box (ovpn-113-159.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.113.159]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4019819D6C; Tue, 16 Feb 2021 17:51:07 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2021 18:51:06 +0100 From: Kevin Wolf To: Alberto Garcia Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 0/4] Allow changing bs->file on reopen Message-ID: <20210216175106.GD5282@merkur.fritz.box> References: <20210210172657.GJ5144@merkur.fritz.box> <20210216164807.GC5282@merkur.fritz.box> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.84 on 10.5.11.23 Authentication-Results: relay.mimecast.com; auth=pass smtp.auth=CUSA124A263 smtp.mailfrom=kwolf@redhat.com X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Received-SPF: pass client-ip=63.128.21.124; envelope-from=kwolf@redhat.com; helo=us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com X-Spam_score_int: -27 X-Spam_score: -2.8 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.8 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy , pkrempa@redhat.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, qemu-block@nongnu.org, Max Reitz Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" Am 16.02.2021 um 18:25 hat Alberto Garcia geschrieben: > On Tue 16 Feb 2021 05:48:07 PM CET, Kevin Wolf wrote: > > >> There is no problem with removing the filter anymore. See here for a > >> description of the original problem: > >> > >> https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-block/2020-12/msg00090.html > > > > Ah, nice. Can we just add removing the filter again to the test then? > > That is already in this series, see patch #2. Oh, indeed. I missed the second reopen, probably expected the code to be longer than that. :-) Kevin