From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.2 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_2 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB404C433E0 for ; Tue, 23 Feb 2021 09:56:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0FA3C64DA1 for ; Tue, 23 Feb 2021 09:56:19 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 0FA3C64DA1 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=kaod.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Received: from localhost ([::1]:34960 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lEUQU-0003Ce-TZ for qemu-devel@archiver.kernel.org; Tue, 23 Feb 2021 04:56:18 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:56398) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lEUPY-0002hB-A3; Tue, 23 Feb 2021 04:55:20 -0500 Received: from smtpout1.mo804.mail-out.ovh.net ([79.137.123.220]:52533) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lEUPW-0005hR-7Q; Tue, 23 Feb 2021 04:55:20 -0500 Received: from mxplan5.mail.ovh.net (unknown [10.108.16.68]) by mo804.mail-out.ovh.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 97D8E906B7C6; Tue, 23 Feb 2021 10:55:13 +0100 (CET) Received: from kaod.org (37.59.142.100) by DAG8EX1.mxp5.local (172.16.2.71) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2106.2; Tue, 23 Feb 2021 10:55:12 +0100 Authentication-Results: garm.ovh; auth=pass (GARM-100R003fdd3c27a-2c97-4ecb-bfbd-29b1a101441f, 6F2917FB5EF69EFB637F8DE19110E4015BA123FD) smtp.auth=groug@kaod.org X-OVh-ClientIp: 78.197.208.248 Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2021 10:55:10 +0100 From: Greg Kurz To: Bin Meng Subject: Re: who's using the ozlabs patchwork install for QEMU patches ? Message-ID: <20210223105510.0687d0b6@bahia.lan> In-Reply-To: References: <99af17f9-10cf-7c9b-8222-2318b464f5b0@redhat.com> <20210222082137.1b3f8b3b@bahia.lan> <20210222154341.0992238d@bahia.lan> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.17.8 (GTK+ 2.24.32; x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [37.59.142.100] X-ClientProxiedBy: DAG7EX1.mxp5.local (172.16.2.61) To DAG8EX1.mxp5.local (172.16.2.71) X-Ovh-Tracer-GUID: e7aab1c2-4495-495f-9cd5-bc5b32af9fb4 X-Ovh-Tracer-Id: 15060318630309697900 X-VR-SPAMSTATE: OK X-VR-SPAMSCORE: -100 X-VR-SPAMCAUSE: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduledrkeehgddutdcutefuodetggdotefrodftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfqggfjpdevjffgvefmvefgnecuuegrihhlohhuthemucehtddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmdenucfjughrpeffhffvuffkjghfofggtgfgihesthejredtredtvdenucfhrhhomhepifhrvghgucfmuhhriicuoehgrhhouhhgsehkrghougdrohhrgheqnecuggftrfgrthhtvghrnhepuedugfeljeetjefhfeduhfffledvieelfffggeegfeegteegfeeukeduudetffdunecuffhomhgrihhnpehoiihlrggsshdrohhrghenucfkpheptddrtddrtddrtddpfeejrdehledrudegvddruddttdenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhhouggvpehsmhhtphdqohhuthdphhgvlhhopehmgihplhgrnhehrdhmrghilhdrohhvhhdrnhgvthdpihhnvghtpedtrddtrddtrddtpdhmrghilhhfrhhomhepghhrohhugheskhgrohgurdhorhhgpdhrtghpthhtohepuggrvhhiugesghhisghsohhnrdgurhhophgsvggrrhdrihgurdgruh Received-SPF: pass client-ip=79.137.123.220; envelope-from=groug@kaod.org; helo=smtpout1.mo804.mail-out.ovh.net X-Spam_score_int: -5 X-Spam_score: -0.6 X-Spam_bar: / X-Spam_report: (-0.6 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET=1.347, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Peter Maydell , Thomas Huth , Alexey Kardashevskiy , Christian Schoenebeck , QEMU Developers , "qemu-ppc@nongnu.org" , David Gibson Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" On Tue, 23 Feb 2021 14:57:21 +0800 Bin Meng wrote: > On Mon, Feb 22, 2021 at 10:43 PM Greg Kurz wrote: > > > > On Mon, 22 Feb 2021 13:59:34 +0000 > > Peter Maydell wrote: > > > > > On Mon, 22 Feb 2021 at 07:21, Greg Kurz wrote: > > > > > > > > On Fri, 19 Feb 2021 17:51:02 +0100 > > > > Thomas Huth wrote: > > > > > > > > > On 19/02/2021 17.26, Peter Maydell wrote: > > > > > > Does anybody use the ozlabs patchwork install for QEMU patches, > > > > > > either occasionally or on a regular basis ? > > > > > > http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/qemu-devel/list/ > > > > > > The admins for that system are trying to identify which of > > > > > > the various projects are really using their patchwork instances, > > > > > > so I figured I'd do a quick survey here. We don't use it > > > > > > as an official project tool but it's certainly possible to > > > > > > use it as an individual developer in one way or another. > > > > > > > > > > I think it might be used by some of the ppc hackers ... so CC:-ing to > > > > > qemu-pcc ... > > > > > > > > > > > > > I do on a very regular basis. > > > > > > Thanks for the reports. Do you use the features like assigning > > > patches to people and changing patch status, or do you mostly > > > just use it as a read-only archive-of-patches ? > > > > > > > Only the latter but mostly because I don't have the permissions > > to change status, e.g. when trying to change status of this > > recent patch from Cedric to rearrange the PowerPC docs: > > > > You don't have permissions to edit patch 'docs/system: Extend PPC section' > > > > My understanding is that users must be "maintainer" to edit other's > > patches. Only three 'maintainers' are currently listed at ozlabs for > > QEMU: > > I can update my patch status in the QEMU project. I am not sure if > this is due to I am a maintainer of another project hosted on > ozlabs.org. > Yeah everyone can update its own patches but you need to be maintainer of a project to update the status of other's patch for this project IIUC. > > > > https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/api/1.0/projects/14/ > > > > We had a discussion about that a few months back with Christian Schoenebeck > > (9pfs maintainer, Cc'd) who also uses patchworks. It turned out we didn't > > quite know how to go further because of lack of documentation, but I'd be > > glad to experiment the full patchwork experience if someone knows how to > > do it :-) > > I personally found patchwork is really helpful for mainatiner's work. > But it looks the maintainers from the QEMU community do not use it. > > Regards, > Bin