From: Samuel Thibault <samuel.thibault@gnu.org>
To: Doug Evans <dje@google.com>
Cc: "Philippe Mathieu-Daudé" <philmd@redhat.com>,
"QEMU Developers" <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] net/slirp.c: Refactor address parsing
Date: Sun, 28 Feb 2021 23:44:19 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210228224419.mcbyhs67d3e7pjyi@begin> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CADPb22TSNA-KQmUO0hSGLtWr0tc7H5++gKBAqnpTP-5iarisMA@mail.gmail.com>
Hello,
Doug Evans, le lun. 08 févr. 2021 10:59:01 -0800, a ecrit:
> Samuel, how do qemu patches involving libslirp changes usually work?
Well, we haven't had many yet actually :)
> Should I have held off submitting the qemu patch until the libslirp
> prerequisite has been added to qemu's tree,
No, as this example shows, there are iterations that can happen on the
qemu side before we have something we can commit, so better do both in
parallel.
I don't know what qemu people think about the slirp submodule: do qemu
prefers to only track stable branchs, or would it be fine to track the
master branch? I guess you'd prefer to have a slirp stable release you
can depend on when releasing qemu, so perhaps better wait for a slirp
release before bumping in qemu, just to be safe? Which doesn't mean
avoiding submitting patchqueues that depend on it before that, better go
in parallel.
> or maybe I should include the libslirp patch so that people can at least apply
> it (with a caveat saying the patch is already in libslirp.git) until it's added
> to the qemu tree?
Not sure what is best here. We at least need something so that people
are not confused by the patchqueue calling some function that doesn't
exist in the submodule yet.
Samuel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-02-28 22:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-02-03 21:37 [PATCH v2 0/2] Add support for ipv6 host forwarding dje--- via
2021-02-03 21:37 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] net/slirp.c: Refactor address parsing dje--- via
2021-02-03 21:39 ` Doug Evans
2021-02-03 22:15 ` Samuel Thibault
2021-02-03 22:31 ` Doug Evans
2021-02-08 11:09 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2021-02-08 18:59 ` Doug Evans
2021-02-28 22:44 ` Samuel Thibault [this message]
2021-02-03 21:37 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] net: Add -ipv6-hostfwd option, ipv6_hostfwd_add/remove commands dje--- via
2021-02-03 22:20 ` Samuel Thibault
2021-02-03 22:29 ` Doug Evans
2021-02-04 9:57 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2021-02-03 21:45 ` [PATCH v2 0/2] Add support for ipv6 host forwarding no-reply
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210228224419.mcbyhs67d3e7pjyi@begin \
--to=samuel.thibault@gnu.org \
--cc=dje@google.com \
--cc=philmd@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).