From: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>, Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>,
Halil Pasic <pasic@linux.ibm.com>,
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>,
qemu-s390x@nongnu.org, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>,
Richard Henderson <rth@twiddle.net>
Subject: [PATCH v1 0/2] Get rid of legacy_s390_alloc() and phys_mem_set_alloc()
Date: Wed, 3 Mar 2021 14:09:14 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210303130916.22553-1-david@redhat.com> (raw)
Let's finally get rid of the alternative allocation function. Outcome of
a discussion in:
https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210303123517.04729c1e.cohuck@redhat.com
David Hildenbrand (2):
s390x/kvm: Get rid of legacy_s390_alloc()
exec: Get rid of phys_mem_set_alloc()
include/sysemu/kvm.h | 4 ----
softmmu/physmem.c | 36 +++---------------------------------
target/s390x/kvm.c | 43 +++++--------------------------------------
3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 75 deletions(-)
--
2.29.2
next reply other threads:[~2021-03-03 13:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-03-03 13:09 David Hildenbrand [this message]
2021-03-03 13:09 ` [PATCH v1 1/2] s390x/kvm: Get rid of legacy_s390_alloc() David Hildenbrand
2021-03-03 13:31 ` Thomas Huth
2021-03-03 14:07 ` Christian Borntraeger
2021-03-03 16:13 ` Igor Mammedov
2021-03-03 13:09 ` [PATCH v1 2/2] exec: Get rid of phys_mem_set_alloc() David Hildenbrand
2021-03-03 14:38 ` Thomas Huth
2021-03-03 16:18 ` Igor Mammedov
2021-03-04 13:44 ` [PATCH v1 0/2] Get rid of legacy_s390_alloc() and phys_mem_set_alloc() Cornelia Huck
2021-03-10 16:22 ` Cornelia Huck
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210303130916.22553-1-david@redhat.com \
--to=david@redhat.com \
--cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
--cc=cohuck@redhat.com \
--cc=imammedo@redhat.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pasic@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=peterx@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-s390x@nongnu.org \
--cc=rth@twiddle.net \
--cc=thuth@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).