From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.6 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_INVALID, DKIM_SIGNED,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1152C433E0 for ; Thu, 11 Mar 2021 17:18:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 06AF364FDE for ; Thu, 11 Mar 2021 17:18:03 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 06AF364FDE Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Received: from localhost ([::1]:33418 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lKOwk-0004V4-Vc for qemu-devel@archiver.kernel.org; Thu, 11 Mar 2021 12:18:03 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:60382) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lKOqw-0008J2-0f for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 11 Mar 2021 12:12:02 -0500 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com ([216.205.24.124]:29507) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lKOqu-00064y-BE for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 11 Mar 2021 12:12:01 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1615482719; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=nn9ibjwO/ZzEYZfmmzHHmJauUJIIwy73b6BOTVRulKo=; b=UfidaBheWCAc2J5Hy/g2RQO/k34cau0rMHwvm1PJNdGKn2WT+GoLrvjLsjCxyGifWeRKLZ ZQaoB+hC+vA3/KnmdellTn5pyNXVo+VYmqQsNpVJEBP3qlf4mt62vikHHMOBTSGkp58axe iWJzljZk9RHb12SgRqPqQhgVDgEPwIk= Received: from mail-qk1-f200.google.com (mail-qk1-f200.google.com [209.85.222.200]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-517-mg31ZzPQM4yhgb-Sik6-Fw-1; Thu, 11 Mar 2021 12:11:57 -0500 X-MC-Unique: mg31ZzPQM4yhgb-Sik6-Fw-1 Received: by mail-qk1-f200.google.com with SMTP id b78so16021044qkg.13 for ; Thu, 11 Mar 2021 09:11:57 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=nn9ibjwO/ZzEYZfmmzHHmJauUJIIwy73b6BOTVRulKo=; b=EMcsetOIHeoiST4RiksTPzJcLQoJOD6iX3o+68iiYG8CQznIEKfL6hTsFwvTmEzOjF IlZO3/M+nJWg4Sgk2UGM2+Pb0fGnEYRwkhobILieMFoP+FkJAWiHuhbIc9m1wK8swboL SMU0ikUx54ughuHbHVegYmPqKwsp/RI980tsJpuI9r+Wotd3HmVPdCDaPFUaIfGqMR/Z iaaDZGr6QLyU5mjQTL/uu24EZwuj2Mw/bxP7iSyiBuItjSxSD3s+mtLNiwTEIFd2YoEJ Vs5c7sU6y75Z2FcmNuRbHMoMQpss8pWzUyECTOYlhzjC9S/QVQori5Q2dvqr1Ei8gq8F Zwhg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5310urv5d5f+ggWTe81/RtVxq5tB5GYsG3fsJib5nFz1rgaZUj0z VXnX5FMZIB6elZX0HSXgXl+kNK82lKq+QY3c7PQdkYHqf7HaMeYsfXB48ssvfbEaxSVq7VkednR wMSbMh/Ku70VvpbQ= X-Received: by 2002:a37:af85:: with SMTP id y127mr8731997qke.268.1615482717150; Thu, 11 Mar 2021 09:11:57 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzSr/iCW47QVCDYeT3NzW6eAgzszzOe2mPCFbml3KPhAut1d6G6t1sg/STX29blJyXUncZkXg== X-Received: by 2002:a37:af85:: with SMTP id y127mr8731955qke.268.1615482716764; Thu, 11 Mar 2021 09:11:56 -0800 (PST) Received: from xz-x1 ([142.126.89.138]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id m13sm2374291qkk.16.2021.03.11.09.11.55 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 11 Mar 2021 09:11:56 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2021 12:11:53 -0500 From: Peter Xu To: David Hildenbrand Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 02/12] softmmu/physmem: Fix ram_block_discard_range() to handle shared anonymous memory Message-ID: <20210311171153.GF194839@xz-x1> References: <20210308150600.14440-1-david@redhat.com> <20210308150600.14440-3-david@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Authentication-Results: relay.mimecast.com; auth=pass smtp.auth=CUSA124A263 smtp.mailfrom=peterx@redhat.com X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Received-SPF: pass client-ip=216.205.24.124; envelope-from=peterx@redhat.com; helo=us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com X-Spam_score_int: -29 X-Spam_score: -3.0 X-Spam_bar: --- X-Spam_report: (-3.0 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.25, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Marcel Apfelbaum , Cornelia Huck , Eduardo Habkost , "Michael S. Tsirkin" , Stefan Weil , Murilo Opsfelder Araujo , Richard Henderson , "Dr. David Alan Gilbert" , Juan Quintela , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Halil Pasic , Christian Borntraeger , Greg Kurz , Stefan Hajnoczi , Igor Mammedov , Thomas Huth , Paolo Bonzini , Philippe =?utf-8?Q?Mathieu-Daud=C3=A9?= , Igor Kotrasinski Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" On Thu, Mar 11, 2021 at 05:45:46PM +0100, David Hildenbrand wrote: > On 11.03.21 17:39, Dr. David Alan Gilbert wrote: > > * David Hildenbrand (david@redhat.com) wrote: > > > We can create shared anonymous memory via > > > "-object memory-backend-ram,share=on,..." > > > which is, for example, required by PVRDMA for mremap() to work. > > > > > > Shared anonymous memory is weird, though. Instead of MADV_DONTNEED, we > > > have to use MADV_REMOVE. MADV_DONTNEED fails silently and does nothing. > > > > OK, I wonder how stable these rules are; is it defined anywhere that > > it's required? > > > > I had a look at the Linux implementation: it's essentially shmem ... but we > don't have an fd exposed, so we cannot use fallocate() ... :) > > MADV_REMOVE documents (man): > > "In the initial implementation, only tmpfs(5) was supported MADV_REMOVE; but > since Linux 3.5, any filesystem which supports the fallocate(2) > FALLOC_FL_PUNCH_HOLE mode also supports MADV_REMOVE." Hmm, I see that MADV_DONTNEED will still tear down all mappings even for anonymous shmem.. what did I miss? -- Peter Xu