From: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>
To: Greg Kurz <groug@kaod.org>
Cc: virtio-fs@redhat.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [Virtio-fs] [PATCH 1/3] virtiofsd: Don't allow empty paths in lookup_name()
Date: Sun, 14 Mar 2021 19:38:32 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210314233832.GE223210@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210312141003.819108-2-groug@kaod.org>
On Fri, Mar 12, 2021 at 03:10:01PM +0100, Greg Kurz wrote:
> When passed an empty filename, lookup_name() returns the inode of
> the parent directory, unless the parent is the root in which case
> the st_dev doesn't match and lo_find() returns NULL. This is
> because lookup_name() passes AT_EMPTY_PATH down to fstatat() or
> statx().
>
> This behavior doesn't quite make sense because users of lookup_name()
> then pass the name to unlinkat(), renameat() or renameat2(), all of
> which will always fail on empty names.
>
> Drop AT_EMPTY_PATH from the flags in lookup_name() so that it has
> the consistent behavior of "returning an existing child inode or
> NULL" for all directories.
>
> Signed-off-by: Greg Kurz <groug@kaod.org>
Looks good to me. Can't think in what cases fuse will need to pass in
empty path for lookup.
Reviewed-by: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>
Vivek
> ---
> tools/virtiofsd/passthrough_ll.c | 3 +--
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/virtiofsd/passthrough_ll.c b/tools/virtiofsd/passthrough_ll.c
> index fc7e1b1e8e2b..27a6c636dcaf 100644
> --- a/tools/virtiofsd/passthrough_ll.c
> +++ b/tools/virtiofsd/passthrough_ll.c
> @@ -1308,8 +1308,7 @@ static struct lo_inode *lookup_name(fuse_req_t req, fuse_ino_t parent,
> return NULL;
> }
>
> - res = do_statx(lo, dir->fd, name, &attr,
> - AT_EMPTY_PATH | AT_SYMLINK_NOFOLLOW, &mnt_id);
> + res = do_statx(lo, dir->fd, name, &attr, AT_SYMLINK_NOFOLLOW, &mnt_id);
> lo_inode_put(lo, &dir);
> if (res == -1) {
> return NULL;
> --
> 2.26.2
>
> _______________________________________________
> Virtio-fs mailing list
> Virtio-fs@redhat.com
> https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/virtio-fs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-03-14 23:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-03-12 14:10 [PATCH 0/3] virtiofsd: Deal with empty filenames Greg Kurz
2021-03-12 14:10 ` [PATCH 1/3] virtiofsd: Don't allow empty paths in lookup_name() Greg Kurz
2021-03-12 15:13 ` [Virtio-fs] " Connor Kuehl
2021-03-12 15:49 ` Greg Kurz
2021-03-14 23:38 ` Vivek Goyal [this message]
2021-03-12 14:10 ` [PATCH 2/3] virtiofsd: Convert some functions to return bool Greg Kurz
2021-03-12 15:13 ` [Virtio-fs] " Connor Kuehl
2021-03-14 23:36 ` Vivek Goyal
2021-03-12 14:10 ` [PATCH 3/3] virtiofsd: Don't allow empty filenames Greg Kurz
2021-03-12 15:13 ` [Virtio-fs] " Connor Kuehl
2021-03-14 23:36 ` Vivek Goyal
2021-03-15 10:06 ` Greg Kurz
2021-03-15 15:18 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2021-03-15 17:37 ` Greg Kurz
2021-03-15 17:55 ` Vivek Goyal
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210314233832.GE223210@redhat.com \
--to=vgoyal@redhat.com \
--cc=groug@kaod.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=virtio-fs@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).