From: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
To: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Cc: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>,
David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>,
Halil Pasic <pasic@linux.ibm.com>,
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>,
qemu-s390x@nongnu.org, Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Richard Henderson <rth@twiddle.net>
Subject: [PULL 1/6] s390x/kvm: Get rid of legacy_s390_alloc()
Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2021 11:12:16 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210316101221.1890034-2-cohuck@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210316101221.1890034-1-cohuck@redhat.com>
From: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
legacy_s390_alloc() was required for dealing with the absence of the ESOP
feature -- on old HW (< gen 10) and old z/VM versions (< 6.3).
As z/VM v6.2 (and even v6.3) is no longer supported since 2017 [1]
and we don't expect to have real users on such old hardware, let's drop
legacy_s390_alloc().
Still check+report an error just in case someone still runs on
such old z/VM environments, or someone runs under weird nested KVM
setups (where we can manually disable ESOP via the CPU model).
No need to check for KVM_CAP_GMAP - that should always be around on
kernels that also have KVM_CAP_DEVICE_CTRL (>= v3.15).
[1] https://www.ibm.com/support/lifecycle/search?q=z%2FVM
Suggested-by: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
Suggested-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: Richard Henderson <rth@twiddle.net>
Cc: Halil Pasic <pasic@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
Cc: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
Cc: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
Cc: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>
Cc: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20210303130916.22553-2-david@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
---
target/s390x/kvm.c | 43 +++++--------------------------------------
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 38 deletions(-)
diff --git a/target/s390x/kvm.c b/target/s390x/kvm.c
index 73f816a72227..4fb3bbfef506 100644
--- a/target/s390x/kvm.c
+++ b/target/s390x/kvm.c
@@ -161,8 +161,6 @@ static int cap_protected;
static int active_cmma;
-static void *legacy_s390_alloc(size_t size, uint64_t *align, bool shared);
-
static int kvm_s390_query_mem_limit(uint64_t *memory_limit)
{
struct kvm_device_attr attr = {
@@ -349,6 +347,11 @@ int kvm_arch_init(MachineState *ms, KVMState *s)
"please use kernel 3.15 or newer");
return -1;
}
+ if (!kvm_check_extension(s, KVM_CAP_S390_COW)) {
+ error_report("KVM is missing capability KVM_CAP_S390_COW - "
+ "unsupported environment");
+ return -1;
+ }
cap_sync_regs = kvm_check_extension(s, KVM_CAP_SYNC_REGS);
cap_async_pf = kvm_check_extension(s, KVM_CAP_ASYNC_PF);
@@ -357,11 +360,6 @@ int kvm_arch_init(MachineState *ms, KVMState *s)
cap_vcpu_resets = kvm_check_extension(s, KVM_CAP_S390_VCPU_RESETS);
cap_protected = kvm_check_extension(s, KVM_CAP_S390_PROTECTED);
- if (!kvm_check_extension(s, KVM_CAP_S390_GMAP)
- || !kvm_check_extension(s, KVM_CAP_S390_COW)) {
- phys_mem_set_alloc(legacy_s390_alloc);
- }
-
kvm_vm_enable_cap(s, KVM_CAP_S390_USER_SIGP, 0);
kvm_vm_enable_cap(s, KVM_CAP_S390_VECTOR_REGISTERS, 0);
kvm_vm_enable_cap(s, KVM_CAP_S390_USER_STSI, 0);
@@ -889,37 +887,6 @@ int kvm_s390_mem_op_pv(S390CPU *cpu, uint64_t offset, void *hostbuf,
return ret;
}
-/*
- * Legacy layout for s390:
- * Older S390 KVM requires the topmost vma of the RAM to be
- * smaller than an system defined value, which is at least 256GB.
- * Larger systems have larger values. We put the guest between
- * the end of data segment (system break) and this value. We
- * use 32GB as a base to have enough room for the system break
- * to grow. We also have to use MAP parameters that avoid
- * read-only mapping of guest pages.
- */
-static void *legacy_s390_alloc(size_t size, uint64_t *align, bool shared)
-{
- static void *mem;
-
- if (mem) {
- /* we only support one allocation, which is enough for initial ram */
- return NULL;
- }
-
- mem = mmap((void *) 0x800000000ULL, size,
- PROT_EXEC|PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE,
- MAP_SHARED | MAP_ANONYMOUS | MAP_FIXED, -1, 0);
- if (mem == MAP_FAILED) {
- mem = NULL;
- }
- if (mem && align) {
- *align = QEMU_VMALLOC_ALIGN;
- }
- return mem;
-}
-
static uint8_t const *sw_bp_inst;
static uint8_t sw_bp_ilen;
--
2.26.3
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-03-16 10:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-03-16 10:12 [PULL 0/6] s390x patches for 6.0 softfreeze Cornelia Huck
2021-03-16 10:12 ` Cornelia Huck [this message]
2021-03-16 10:12 ` [PULL 2/6] exec: Get rid of phys_mem_set_alloc() Cornelia Huck
2021-03-16 10:12 ` [PULL 3/6] s390x/cpu_model: use official name for 8562 Cornelia Huck
2021-03-16 10:12 ` [PULL 4/6] target/s390x: Implement the MVPG condition-code-option bit Cornelia Huck
2021-03-16 10:12 ` [PULL 5/6] target/s390x: Store r1/r2 for page-translation exceptions during MVPG Cornelia Huck
2021-03-16 10:12 ` [PULL 6/6] s390x/pci: Add missing initialization for g_autofree variables Cornelia Huck
2021-03-17 16:23 ` [PULL 0/6] s390x patches for 6.0 softfreeze Peter Maydell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210316101221.1890034-2-cohuck@redhat.com \
--to=cohuck@redhat.com \
--cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=imammedo@redhat.com \
--cc=pasic@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
--cc=peterx@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-s390x@nongnu.org \
--cc=rth@twiddle.net \
--cc=thuth@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).