From: "Philippe Mathieu-Daudé" <philmd@redhat.com>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: "Paolo Bonzini" <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
"Philippe Mathieu-Daudé" <philmd@redhat.com>,
"Christian Borntraeger" <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>,
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Subject: [PATCH for 6.0 v3] hw/intc/i8259: Refactor pic_read_irq() to avoid uninitialized variable
Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2021 17:30:59 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210318163059.3686596-1-philmd@redhat.com> (raw)
Some compiler versions are smart enough to detect a potentially
uninitialized variable, but are not smart enough to detect that this
cannot happen due to the code flow:
../hw/intc/i8259.c: In function ‘pic_read_irq’:
../hw/intc/i8259.c:203:13: error: ‘irq2’ may be used uninitialized in this function [-Werror=maybe-uninitialized]
203 | irq = irq2 + 8;
| ~~~~^~~~~~~~~~
Restrict irq2 variable use to the inner statement.
Fixes: 78ef2b6989f ("i8259: Reorder intack in pic_read_irq")
Reported-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
---
Since v2:
- Remove pic_intack() call (Zoltan)
---
hw/intc/i8259.c | 12 ++++++------
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/hw/intc/i8259.c b/hw/intc/i8259.c
index 344fd04db14..cc4e21ffec0 100644
--- a/hw/intc/i8259.c
+++ b/hw/intc/i8259.c
@@ -176,10 +176,12 @@ static void pic_intack(PICCommonState *s, int irq)
int pic_read_irq(DeviceState *d)
{
PICCommonState *s = PIC_COMMON(d);
- int irq, irq2, intno;
+ int irq, intno;
irq = pic_get_irq(s);
if (irq >= 0) {
+ int irq2;
+
if (irq == 2) {
irq2 = pic_get_irq(slave_pic);
if (irq2 >= 0) {
@@ -189,20 +191,18 @@ int pic_read_irq(DeviceState *d)
irq2 = 7;
}
intno = slave_pic->irq_base + irq2;
+ pic_intack(s, irq);
+ irq = irq2 + 8;
} else {
intno = s->irq_base + irq;
+ pic_intack(s, irq);
}
- pic_intack(s, irq);
} else {
/* spurious IRQ on host controller */
irq = 7;
intno = s->irq_base + irq;
}
- if (irq == 2) {
- irq = irq2 + 8;
- }
-
#ifdef DEBUG_IRQ_LATENCY
printf("IRQ%d latency=%0.3fus\n",
irq,
--
2.26.2
next reply other threads:[~2021-03-18 16:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-03-18 16:30 Philippe Mathieu-Daudé [this message]
2021-03-18 16:34 ` [PATCH for 6.0 v3] hw/intc/i8259: Refactor pic_read_irq() to avoid uninitialized variable Christian Borntraeger
2021-03-18 17:34 ` Paolo Bonzini
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210318163059.3686596-1-philmd@redhat.com \
--to=philmd@redhat.com \
--cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).