qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
To: qemu-block@nongnu.org, Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>,
	Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>
Cc: Andrey Shinkevich <andrey.shinkevich@virtuozzo.com>,
	Viktor Mihajlovski <mihajlov@linux.ibm.com>,
	qemu-devel@nongnu.org,
	Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH] block/file-posix: Fix problem with fallocate(PUNCH_HOLE) on GPFS
Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2021 07:23:33 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210416052333.1548853-1-thuth@redhat.com> (raw)

A customer reported that running

 qemu-img convert -t none -O qcow2 -f qcow2 input.qcow2 output.qcow2

fails for them with the following error message when the images are
stored on a GPFS file system:

 qemu-img: error while writing sector 0: Invalid argument

After analyzing the strace output, it seems like the problem is in
handle_aiocb_write_zeroes(): The call to fallocate(FALLOC_FL_PUNCH_HOLE)
returns EINVAL, which can apparently happen if the file system has
a different idea of the granularity of the operation. It's arguably
a bug in GPFS, since the PUNCH_HOLE mode should not result in EINVAL
according to the man-page of fallocate(), but the file system is out
there in production and so we have to deal with it. In commit 294682cc3a
("block: workaround for unaligned byte range in fallocate()") we also
already applied the a work-around for the same problem to the earlier
fallocate(FALLOC_FL_ZERO_RANGE) call, so do it now similar with the
PUNCH_HOLE call.

Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
---
 block/file-posix.c | 7 +++++++
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)

diff --git a/block/file-posix.c b/block/file-posix.c
index 20e14f8e96..7a40428d52 100644
--- a/block/file-posix.c
+++ b/block/file-posix.c
@@ -1675,6 +1675,13 @@ static int handle_aiocb_write_zeroes(void *opaque)
             }
             s->has_fallocate = false;
         } else if (ret != -ENOTSUP) {
+            if (ret == -EINVAL) {
+                /*
+                 * File systems like GPFS do not like unaligned byte ranges,
+                 * treat it like unsupported (so caller falls back to pwrite)
+                 */
+                return -ENOTSUP;
+            }
             return ret;
         } else {
             s->has_discard = false;
-- 
2.27.0



             reply	other threads:[~2021-04-16  5:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-04-16  5:23 Thomas Huth [this message]
2021-04-16 20:34 ` [PATCH] block/file-posix: Fix problem with fallocate(PUNCH_HOLE) on GPFS Nir Soffer
2021-04-19  5:06   ` Thomas Huth
2021-04-19 13:13     ` Kevin Wolf
2021-05-19 10:21     ` Thomas Huth
2021-05-19 10:41       ` Thomas Huth

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210416052333.1548853-1-thuth@redhat.com \
    --to=thuth@redhat.com \
    --cc=andrey.shinkevich@virtuozzo.com \
    --cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
    --cc=mihajlov@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=mreitz@redhat.com \
    --cc=qemu-block@nongnu.org \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).