Re: [RFC v1 1/5] hw/s390x: only build qemu-tod from the CONFIG_TCG build

[Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>]

On Mon, 19 Apr 2021 18:24:34 +0200
Claudio Fontana <cfontana@suse.de> wrote:

> On 4/19/21 6:20 PM, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> > On Mon, 19 Apr 2021 18:12:48 +0200
> > Claudio Fontana <cfontana@suse.de> wrote:
> >   
> >> On 4/19/21 11:11 AM, Claudio Fontana wrote:  
> >>> Hi Cornelia,
> >>>
> >>> On 3/31/21 1:07 PM, Cornelia Huck wrote:    
> >>>> On Mon, 22 Mar 2021 20:15:47 +0100
> >>>> Claudio Fontana <cfontana@suse.de> wrote:  
> >   
> >>>>> @@ -25,6 +24,10 @@ s390x_ss.add(when: 'CONFIG_KVM', if_true: files(
> >>>>>    's390-stattrib-kvm.c',
> >>>>>    'pv.c',
> >>>>>  ))
> >>>>> +s390x_ss.add(when: 'CONFIG_TCG', if_true: files(
> >>>>> +  'tod-qemu.c',    
> >>>>
> >>>> Should we rename this to tod-tcg.c?    
> >>>
> >>> I think so.    
> >>
> >> Here we are a bit limited though by the fact that the object is currently called:
> >>
> >> include/hw/s390x/tod.h:26:#define TYPE_QEMU_S390_TOD TYPE_S390_TOD "-qemu"
> >>
> >> So there might be a compatibility issue in trying to make this consistent, which would mean to replace this with:
> >>
> >> #define TYPE_TCG_S390_TOD TYPE_S390_TOD "-tcg"
> >>
> >> What do you think?  
> > 
> > How visible is this? I don't think the TOD objects are instantiable by
> > the user.
> >   
> 
> I just remember we were very conservative with the object hierarchy on x86, personally I am fine with the change.
> I will add this change then, I'd ask for people with concerns about this to speak up:
> 
> (Paolo?) 
> 
> Ciao,
> 
> CLaudio
> 

It was more an argument against changing it, because most people won't
see it anyway :)