From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.5 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_INVALID, DKIM_SIGNED,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A037C433ED for ; Tue, 20 Apr 2021 09:58:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7B39A6109E for ; Tue, 20 Apr 2021 09:58:55 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 7B39A6109E Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Received: from localhost ([::1]:45678 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lYn9i-0002UF-4z for qemu-devel@archiver.kernel.org; Tue, 20 Apr 2021 05:58:54 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:44536) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lYn97-000230-Mn for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 20 Apr 2021 05:58:17 -0400 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com ([216.205.24.124]:51333) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lYn96-0006C2-1O for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 20 Apr 2021 05:58:17 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1618912694; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=v+h3qRz8Y0FyRFGl1OdprZlAZGt4mQ1DpcXLKzlJL/E=; b=UB/axd1xZT6BdJVig5jeq9u//8c1MHsJ1d5WwpDiL534NXWC6c8NOaNwno2g2HC4hUa2eh ycUXy0yOf6+AASvs1ADbCDHAI1X/qWy/ZyV32BPD1OOPa6lqnQQI+hw/EXhq96gig8oN1s OX32aKbYh/Mte8VuDWw9f2DJ0a0+Ccw= Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-165-tLegAZseMCSjO7pUGuw0mw-1; Tue, 20 Apr 2021 05:58:12 -0400 X-MC-Unique: tLegAZseMCSjO7pUGuw0mw-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8AD5A8030A1; Tue, 20 Apr 2021 09:58:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from gondolin.fritz.box (ovpn-113-244.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.113.244]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C90B039A73; Tue, 20 Apr 2021 09:58:09 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2021 11:58:07 +0200 From: Cornelia Huck To: Mark Cave-Ayland Subject: Re: any remaining for-6.0 issues? Message-ID: <20210420115807.5de6564a.cohuck@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <666985ba-349f-bbdf-10fd-ec1becb64cd7@ilande.co.uk> References: <20210419090551.4a3ae4eb.cohuck@redhat.com> <20210419190224.33408d0e.cohuck@redhat.com> <666985ba-349f-bbdf-10fd-ec1becb64cd7@ilande.co.uk> Organization: Red Hat GmbH MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.11 Authentication-Results: relay.mimecast.com; auth=pass smtp.auth=CUSA124A263 smtp.mailfrom=cohuck@redhat.com X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Received-SPF: pass client-ip=216.205.24.124; envelope-from=cohuck@redhat.com; helo=us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com X-Spam_score_int: -27 X-Spam_score: -2.8 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.8 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Laurent Vivier , Peter Maydell , Thomas Huth , Philippe =?UTF-8?B?TWF0aGlldS1EYXVkw6k=?= , Richard Henderson , QEMU Developers , Alex =?UTF-8?B?QmVu?= =?UTF-8?B?bsOpZQ==?= Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" On Mon, 19 Apr 2021 20:38:05 +0100 Mark Cave-Ayland wrote: > On 19/04/2021 18:02, Cornelia Huck wrote: > > >> That patch seems to be our best candidate so far, but the intermittent > >> nature of the failures make it hard to pin down... I don't see anything > >> obviously wrong with the patch, maybe some linux-user experts have a > >> better idea? > > > > FWIW, I tried reproducing the issue on some local systems (no luck), > > and on code pushed out to gitlab (where it works most of the time, and > > the user builds where it fails are unpredictable.) > > > > I fear the best we can do right now is stare at the code and try to > > figure out what might be wrong :( > > Is there any particular reason why the unsigned long cast was removed from the front? > Could that have an effect? Indeed, that looks strange. Will give it a try with the cast readded, but I'm still unable to reproduce the error reliably...