From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-15.2 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER,INCLUDES_PATCH, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_2 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5693DC433B4 for ; Wed, 28 Apr 2021 11:08:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A126E61168 for ; Wed, 28 Apr 2021 11:08:40 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org A126E61168 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=Huawei.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Received: from localhost ([::1]:44846 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lbi3b-0003py-L6 for qemu-devel@archiver.kernel.org; Wed, 28 Apr 2021 07:08:39 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:35900) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lbhwk-0005yb-Kp for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 28 Apr 2021 07:01:34 -0400 Received: from frasgout.his.huawei.com ([185.176.79.56]:2128) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lbhwh-0004ll-N7 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 28 Apr 2021 07:01:34 -0400 Received: from fraeml715-chm.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.18.147.201]) by frasgout.his.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4FVbC10vSsz72f7M; Wed, 28 Apr 2021 18:55:41 +0800 (CST) Received: from lhreml710-chm.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.61) by fraeml715-chm.china.huawei.com (10.206.15.34) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2176.2; Wed, 28 Apr 2021 13:01:18 +0200 Received: from localhost (10.52.123.69) by lhreml710-chm.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.61) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2176.2; Wed, 28 Apr 2021 12:01:17 +0100 Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2021 11:59:44 +0100 From: Jonathan Cameron To: Chris Browy Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 cxl2.0-v3-doe 2/6] include/hw/pci: headers for PCIe DOE Message-ID: <20210428115944.00004ead@Huawei.com> In-Reply-To: <1619457403-12901-1-git-send-email-cbrowy@avery-design.com> References: <1619454964-10190-1-git-send-email-cbrowy@avery-design.com> <1619457403-12901-1-git-send-email-cbrowy@avery-design.com> Organization: Huawei Technologies Research and Development (UK) Ltd. X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.17.8 (GTK+ 2.24.33; i686-w64-mingw32) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [10.52.123.69] X-ClientProxiedBy: lhreml751-chm.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.201) To lhreml710-chm.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.61) X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Received-SPF: pass client-ip=185.176.79.56; envelope-from=jonathan.cameron@huawei.com; helo=frasgout.his.huawei.com X-Spam_score_int: -18 X-Spam_score: -1.9 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.9 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: ben.widawsky@intel.com, jgroves@micron.com, david@redhat.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, vishal.l.verma@intel.com, mst@redhat.com, armbru@redhat.com, linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org, f4bug@amsat.org, hchkuo@avery-design.com.tw, tyshao@avery-design.com.tw, imammedo@redhat.com, dan.j.williams@intel.com, ira.weiny@intel.com Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" On Mon, 26 Apr 2021 13:16:43 -0400 Chris Browy wrote: > From: hchkuo > > Macros for the vender ID of PCI-SIG and the size of PCIe Data Object > Exchange. The PCI SIG vendor ID is a little tricky to track down as it's only called out indirectly in PCI specs. In a similar fashion to what Bjorn asked for in the kernel code, perhaps a reference to where it is in the DOE ECN would at least reassure people that 0x0001 definitely is the PCI-SIG? > > Signed-off-by: Chris Browy One comment inline. Jonathan > --- > include/hw/pci/pci_ids.h | 2 ++ > include/hw/pci/pcie_regs.h | 3 +++ > 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/include/hw/pci/pci_ids.h b/include/hw/pci/pci_ids.h > index 95f92d98e9..471c915395 100644 > --- a/include/hw/pci/pci_ids.h > +++ b/include/hw/pci/pci_ids.h > @@ -157,6 +157,8 @@ > > /* Vendors and devices. Sort key: vendor first, device next. */ > > +#define PCI_VENDOR_ID_PCI_SIG 0x0001 > + > #define PCI_VENDOR_ID_LSI_LOGIC 0x1000 > #define PCI_DEVICE_ID_LSI_53C810 0x0001 > #define PCI_DEVICE_ID_LSI_53C895A 0x0012 > diff --git a/include/hw/pci/pcie_regs.h b/include/hw/pci/pcie_regs.h > index 1db86b0ec4..5ec7014211 100644 > --- a/include/hw/pci/pcie_regs.h > +++ b/include/hw/pci/pcie_regs.h > @@ -179,4 +179,7 @@ typedef enum PCIExpLinkWidth { > #define PCI_ACS_VER 0x1 > #define PCI_ACS_SIZEOF 8 > > +/* DOE Capability Register Fields */ > +#define PCI_DOE_SIZEOF 24 I wonder if we should do the same thing as for other cases above and also have the PCI_DOE_VER defined here? In theory the SIZEOF only refers to the current version of DOE - it might get bigger in future... Jonathan > + > #endif /* QEMU_PCIE_REGS_H */