[PULL 10/39] block: refactor bdrv_child* permission functions

[Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>]

From: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>

Split out non-recursive parts, and refactor as block graph transaction
action.

Signed-off-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
Reviewed-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20210428151804.439460-11-vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
---
 block.c | 79 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------
 1 file changed, 59 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)

diff --git a/block.c b/block.c
index fd621f0403..0ee0c2f29a 100644
--- a/block.c
+++ b/block.c
@@ -49,6 +49,7 @@
 #include "qemu/timer.h"
 #include "qemu/cutils.h"
 #include "qemu/id.h"
+#include "qemu/transactions.h"
 #include "block/coroutines.h"
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_BSD
@@ -2093,6 +2094,61 @@ static void bdrv_child_perm(BlockDriverState *bs, BlockDriverState *child_bs,
     }
 }
 
+static void bdrv_child_set_perm_commit(void *opaque)
+{
+    BdrvChild *c = opaque;
+
+    c->has_backup_perm = false;
+}
+
+static void bdrv_child_set_perm_abort(void *opaque)
+{
+    BdrvChild *c = opaque;
+    /*
+     * We may have child->has_backup_perm unset at this point, as in case of
+     * _check_ stage of permission update failure we may _check_ not the whole
+     * subtree.  Still, _abort_ is called on the whole subtree anyway.
+     */
+    if (c->has_backup_perm) {
+        c->perm = c->backup_perm;
+        c->shared_perm = c->backup_shared_perm;
+        c->has_backup_perm = false;
+    }
+}
+
+static TransactionActionDrv bdrv_child_set_pem_drv = {
+    .abort = bdrv_child_set_perm_abort,
+    .commit = bdrv_child_set_perm_commit,
+};
+
+/*
+ * With tran=NULL needs to be followed by direct call to either
+ * bdrv_child_set_perm_commit() or bdrv_child_set_perm_abort().
+ *
+ * With non-NULL tran needs to be followed by tran_abort() or tran_commit()
+ * instead.
+ */
+static void bdrv_child_set_perm_safe(BdrvChild *c, uint64_t perm,
+                                     uint64_t shared, Transaction *tran)
+{
+    if (!c->has_backup_perm) {
+        c->has_backup_perm = true;
+        c->backup_perm = c->perm;
+        c->backup_shared_perm = c->shared_perm;
+    }
+    /*
+     * Note: it's OK if c->has_backup_perm was already set, as we can find the
+     * same c twice during check_perm procedure
+     */
+
+    c->perm = perm;
+    c->shared_perm = shared;
+
+    if (tran) {
+        tran_add(tran, &bdrv_child_set_pem_drv, c);
+    }
+}
+
 /*
  * Check whether permissions on this node can be changed in a way that
  * @cumulative_perms and @cumulative_shared_perms are the new cumulative
@@ -2358,37 +2414,20 @@ static int bdrv_child_check_perm(BdrvChild *c, BlockReopenQueue *q,
         return ret;
     }
 
-    if (!c->has_backup_perm) {
-        c->has_backup_perm = true;
-        c->backup_perm = c->perm;
-        c->backup_shared_perm = c->shared_perm;
-    }
-    /*
-     * Note: it's OK if c->has_backup_perm was already set, as we can find the
-     * same child twice during check_perm procedure
-     */
-
-    c->perm = perm;
-    c->shared_perm = shared;
+    bdrv_child_set_perm_safe(c, perm, shared, NULL);
 
     return 0;
 }
 
 static void bdrv_child_set_perm(BdrvChild *c)
 {
-    c->has_backup_perm = false;
-
+    bdrv_child_set_perm_commit(c);
     bdrv_set_perm(c->bs);
 }
 
 static void bdrv_child_abort_perm_update(BdrvChild *c)
 {
-    if (c->has_backup_perm) {
-        c->perm = c->backup_perm;
-        c->shared_perm = c->backup_shared_perm;
-        c->has_backup_perm = false;
-    }
-
+    bdrv_child_set_perm_abort(c);
     bdrv_abort_perm_update(c->bs);
 }
 
-- 
2.30.2