From: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>
To: Thanos Makatos <thanos.makatos@nutanix.com>
Cc: "qemu-devel@nongnu.org" <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>,
Raphael Norwitz <raphael.norwitz@nutanix.com>
Subject: Re: question regarding QEMU adding overlapping memory regions to VFIO
Date: Fri, 7 May 2021 09:42:05 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210507094205.43adae95@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <MW2PR02MB3723B94416375A06F6F69BB08B579@MW2PR02MB3723.namprd02.prod.outlook.com>
On Fri, 7 May 2021 13:51:52 +0000
Thanos Makatos <thanos.makatos@nutanix.com> wrote:
> I've noticed that QEMU adds overlapping memory regions to VFIO, e.g.:
>
> vfio_listener_region_add_ram region_add [ram] 0xc0000 - 0xc0fff [0x7f6702c00000]
> vfio_listener_region_del region_del 0xc4000 - 0xdffff
> vfio_listener_region_add_ram region_add [ram] 0xc1000 - 0xc3fff [0x7f66406c1000]
> vfio_listener_region_del region_del 0xe0000 - 0xfffff
> vfio_listener_region_add_ram region_add [ram] 0xc4000 - 0xdffff [0x7f6702c04000]
> vfio_listener_region_add_ram region_add [ram] 0xc0000 - 0xc0fff [0x7f66406c0000]
> 2021-05-05T09:38:16.158864Z qemu-system-x86_64: vfio_dma_map(0x557b8fd281b0, 0xc0000, 0x1000, 0x7f66406c0000) = -22 (Resource temporarily unavailable)
>
> Region 0xc0000 - 0xc0fff is added first and then region 0xc0000 -
> 0xc0fff is added again? Is this legitimate? What is the implication
> of this? Is the previous region replaced by the more recent one?
This might be where the hack we have in hw/vfio/common.c:vfio_dma_map()
comes from:
/*
* Try the mapping, if it fails with EBUSY, unmap the region and try
* again. This shouldn't be necessary, but we sometimes see it in
* the VGA ROM space.
*/
if (ioctl(container->fd, VFIO_IOMMU_MAP_DMA, &map) == 0 ||
(errno == EBUSY && vfio_dma_unmap(container, iova, size, NULL) == 0 &&
ioctl(container->fd, VFIO_IOMMU_MAP_DMA, &map) == 0)) {
return 0;
}
Clearly that's only triggered with -EBUSY and you're getting -EINVAL,
did we unintentionally change the errno for this? What's the host
kernel version?
It's my expectation that this really shouldn't happen, the above is a
lazy workaround, but a listener being told to map two different things
at the same address range without an unmap in between seems like it
should violate the MemoryListener protocol. Thanks,
Alex
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-05-07 15:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-05-07 13:51 question regarding QEMU adding overlapping memory regions to VFIO Thanos Makatos
2021-05-07 15:42 ` Alex Williamson [this message]
2021-05-07 16:22 ` Thanos Makatos
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210507094205.43adae95@redhat.com \
--to=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=raphael.norwitz@nutanix.com \
--cc=thanos.makatos@nutanix.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).