From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.5 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_INVALID, DKIM_SIGNED,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE3ADC433B4 for ; Wed, 19 May 2021 11:16:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5E5106135F for ; Wed, 19 May 2021 11:16:15 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 5E5106135F Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Received: from localhost ([::1]:48142 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ljKBS-0002ra-IN for qemu-devel@archiver.kernel.org; Wed, 19 May 2021 07:16:14 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:37746) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ljKAA-0001Qi-Fd for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 19 May 2021 07:14:54 -0400 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com ([170.10.133.124]:59050) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ljKA8-00014e-S0 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 19 May 2021 07:14:54 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1621422891; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=hOwEcYDYJUMoTe23sj6OJdl6wEZWoP85uwz7IiA7XVU=; b=WDQApDYiP84QDImTLxwoP/A54YuHBhM/CDxbRHLrHD3a1yHPcBM+Qt2lXh4oN9p5Wg4Yvv 7A2vuU2vbnZigdfHk2afFprd3KAQ4AwpziQPhMIlyo8P2uSVSeRm8sg61x9J/T0pc0rBLR 4UK5jJ5WCIDXBPpLon2ppZfeAHDWydI= Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-444-0zI7N_CdNt22NRmcheEsRg-1; Wed, 19 May 2021 07:14:48 -0400 X-MC-Unique: 0zI7N_CdNt22NRmcheEsRg-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx06.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.16]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7DAD3800D62; Wed, 19 May 2021 11:14:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from gondolin.fritz.box (ovpn-112-33.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.112.33]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 065BE5C1CF; Wed, 19 May 2021 11:14:45 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 19 May 2021 13:14:43 +0200 From: Cornelia Huck To: Ilya Leoshkevich Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] target/i386: Make sure that vsyscall's tb->size != 0 Message-ID: <20210519131443.7310a323.cohuck@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20210519045738.1335210-1-iii@linux.ibm.com> References: <20210519045738.1335210-1-iii@linux.ibm.com> Organization: Red Hat GmbH MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.16 Authentication-Results: relay.mimecast.com; auth=pass smtp.auth=CUSA124A263 smtp.mailfrom=cohuck@redhat.com X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Received-SPF: pass client-ip=170.10.133.124; envelope-from=cohuck@redhat.com; helo=us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com X-Spam_score_int: -31 X-Spam_score: -3.2 X-Spam_bar: --- X-Spam_report: (-3.2 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.39, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Peter Maydell , Eduardo Habkost , Richard Henderson , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Christian Borntraeger , Paolo Bonzini Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" On Wed, 19 May 2021 06:57:36 +0200 Ilya Leoshkevich wrote: > This series for the s390-next tree fixes [1]. Patch 1 is the fix, patch > 2 is the new test to avoid similar regressions in the future. > > [1] https://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2021-05/msg02962.html > > v1: https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2021-05/msg03219.html > v1 -> v2: Fixed a problem with compiling the new test on centos7. `make > docker-all-tests` does not spot any other issues with the > updated patch (it does fail though: a number of iotests have > problems, there is a build problem with musl, etc, but this > all happens without the patch too). > > Ilya Leoshkevich (2): > target/i386: Make sure that vsyscall's tb->size != 0 > tests/tcg/x86_64: add vsyscall smoke test > > target/i386/tcg/translate.c | 1 + > tests/tcg/x86_64/Makefile.target | 6 +++++- > tests/tcg/x86_64/vsyscall.c | 12 ++++++++++++ > 3 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > create mode 100644 tests/tcg/x86_64/vsyscall.c > Passes my tests and CI now. Can I get an ack on patch 2? :)