From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-15.1 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_INVALID, DKIM_SIGNED,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER,INCLUDES_PATCH, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01F1DC47096 for ; Thu, 3 Jun 2021 20:49:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BDC6461263 for ; Thu, 3 Jun 2021 20:49:19 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org BDC6461263 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Received: from localhost ([::1]:34774 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1louHG-0006zD-Nn for qemu-devel@archiver.kernel.org; Thu, 03 Jun 2021 16:49:18 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:45790) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1louGi-0006CH-0L for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 03 Jun 2021 16:48:44 -0400 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com ([170.10.133.124]:41709) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1louGg-0005k0-7Z for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 03 Jun 2021 16:48:43 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1622753321; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=qsquyz8dQumVSza63x6HO6N08vMtN7+iJYNAR/ejjrg=; b=eJWl7jON/dtq5PzjBOAW0R453do4bdkIOxTC7R60ZberCTuZAOgkLjekYaL2DcCtiKv9Fs LZxxtJlfUlbFcicf42JTi88PUP4ydQRh7l+D2+9kEQ8hLdQP6ZT1z7gCEYZkWTFv22ZD5a 97LKIIav956xoTyxkcGbsk/bfi+N+9g= Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-504-6xjeJH5DMKuKpLqXGwpafg-1; Thu, 03 Jun 2021 16:48:38 -0400 X-MC-Unique: 6xjeJH5DMKuKpLqXGwpafg-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx04.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.14]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1A7E31854E21; Thu, 3 Jun 2021 20:48:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from redhat.com (ovpn-113-53.phx2.redhat.com [10.3.113.53]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 596F018E53; Thu, 3 Jun 2021 20:48:36 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 3 Jun 2021 15:48:34 -0500 From: Eric Blake To: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 28/33] nbd/client-connection: do qio_channel_set_delay(false) Message-ID: <20210603204834.ecskt6s22hgwwwo2@redhat.com> References: <20210416080911.83197-1-vsementsov@virtuozzo.com> <20210416080911.83197-29-vsementsov@virtuozzo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20210416080911.83197-29-vsementsov@virtuozzo.com> User-Agent: NeoMutt/20210205 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.14 Authentication-Results: relay.mimecast.com; auth=pass smtp.auth=CUSA124A263 smtp.mailfrom=eblake@redhat.com X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Received-SPF: pass client-ip=170.10.133.124; envelope-from=eblake@redhat.com; helo=us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com X-Spam_score_int: -31 X-Spam_score: -3.2 X-Spam_bar: --- X-Spam_report: (-3.2 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.37, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: kwolf@redhat.com, qemu-block@nongnu.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, mreitz@redhat.com, rvkagan@yandex-team.ru, den@openvz.org Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" On Fri, Apr 16, 2021 at 11:09:06AM +0300, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote: > nbd_open() does it (through nbd_establish_connection()). > Actually we lost that call on reconnect path in 1dc4718d849e1a1fe > "block/nbd: use non-blocking connect: fix vm hang on connect()" > when we have introduced reconnect thread. s/have introduced/introduced the/ > > Fixes: 1dc4718d849e1a1fe665ce5241ed79048cfa2cfc > Signed-off-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy > --- > nbd/client-connection.c | 2 ++ > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/nbd/client-connection.c b/nbd/client-connection.c > index 36d2c7c693..00efff293f 100644 > --- a/nbd/client-connection.c > +++ b/nbd/client-connection.c > @@ -126,6 +126,8 @@ static int nbd_connect(QIOChannelSocket *sioc, SocketAddress *addr, > return ret; > } > > + qio_channel_set_delay(QIO_CHANNEL(sioc), false); > + > if (!info) { > return 0; > } Reviewed-by: Eric Blake Is this bug fix something that can be cherry-picked in isolation, or does it depend too much on the rest of the series? -- Eric Blake, Principal Software Engineer Red Hat, Inc. +1-919-301-3266 Virtualization: qemu.org | libvirt.org