From: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
To: qemu-block@nongnu.org
Cc: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>,
Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>,
Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Subject: [PATCH v4 5/6] block/blkdebug: remove new_state field and instead use a local variable
Date: Fri, 4 Jun 2021 12:07:40 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210604100741.18966-6-eesposit@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210604100741.18966-1-eesposit@redhat.com>
There seems to be no benefit in using a field. Replace it with a local
variable.
Signed-off-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
---
block/blkdebug.c | 13 +++++++------
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/block/blkdebug.c b/block/blkdebug.c
index dffd869b32..d597753139 100644
--- a/block/blkdebug.c
+++ b/block/blkdebug.c
@@ -40,7 +40,6 @@
typedef struct BDRVBlkdebugState {
int state;
- int new_state;
uint64_t align;
uint64_t max_transfer;
uint64_t opt_write_zero;
@@ -792,7 +791,7 @@ static void suspend_request(BlockDriverState *bs, BlkdebugRule *rule)
}
static void process_rule(BlockDriverState *bs, struct BlkdebugRule *rule,
- int *action_count)
+ int *action_count, int *new_state)
{
BDRVBlkdebugState *s = bs->opaque;
@@ -812,7 +811,8 @@ static void process_rule(BlockDriverState *bs, struct BlkdebugRule *rule,
break;
case ACTION_SET_STATE:
- s->new_state = rule->options.set_state.new_state;
+ assert(new_state != NULL);
+ *new_state = rule->options.set_state.new_state;
break;
case ACTION_SUSPEND:
@@ -825,13 +825,14 @@ static void blkdebug_debug_event(BlockDriverState *bs, BlkdebugEvent event)
{
BDRVBlkdebugState *s = bs->opaque;
struct BlkdebugRule *rule, *next;
+ int new_state;
int actions_count[ACTION__MAX] = { 0 };
assert((int)event >= 0 && event < BLKDBG__MAX);
- s->new_state = s->state;
+ new_state = s->state;
QLIST_FOREACH_SAFE(rule, &s->rules[event], next, next) {
- process_rule(bs, rule, actions_count);
+ process_rule(bs, rule, actions_count, &new_state);
}
while (actions_count[ACTION_SUSPEND] > 0) {
@@ -839,7 +840,7 @@ static void blkdebug_debug_event(BlockDriverState *bs, BlkdebugEvent event)
actions_count[ACTION_SUSPEND]--;
}
- s->state = s->new_state;
+ s->state = new_state;
}
static int blkdebug_debug_breakpoint(BlockDriverState *bs, const char *event,
--
2.30.2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-06-04 10:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-06-04 10:07 [PATCH v4 0/6] blkdebug: fix racing condition when iterating on Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito
2021-06-04 10:07 ` [PATCH v4 1/6] blkdebug: refactor removal of a suspended request Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito
2021-06-04 16:16 ` Eric Blake
2021-06-07 9:23 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-06-08 8:00 ` Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito
2021-06-08 14:16 ` Eric Blake
2021-06-04 10:07 ` [PATCH v4 2/6] blkdebug: move post-resume handling to resume_req_by_tag Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito
2021-06-04 10:07 ` [PATCH v4 3/6] blkdebug: track all actions Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito
2021-06-04 10:07 ` [PATCH v4 4/6] blkdebug: do not suspend in the middle of QLIST_FOREACH_SAFE Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito
2021-06-04 10:07 ` Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito [this message]
2021-06-05 14:32 ` [PATCH v4 5/6] block/blkdebug: remove new_state field and instead use a local variable Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2021-06-04 10:07 ` [PATCH v4 6/6] blkdebug: protect rules and suspended_reqs with a lock Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito
2021-06-05 15:15 ` Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2021-06-05 17:53 ` Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito
2021-06-05 19:40 ` Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2021-06-07 9:29 ` Paolo Bonzini
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210604100741.18966-6-eesposit@redhat.com \
--to=eesposit@redhat.com \
--cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
--cc=mreitz@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-block@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=vsementsov@virtuozzo.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).