From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.0 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_INVALID, DKIM_SIGNED,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF5C8C4743D for ; Fri, 4 Jun 2021 18:31:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 454F56139A for ; Fri, 4 Jun 2021 18:31:50 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 454F56139A Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Received: from localhost ([::1]:35872 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lpEbl-00058c-CB for qemu-devel@archiver.kernel.org; Fri, 04 Jun 2021 14:31:49 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:44420) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lpEax-00042N-8Z for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 04 Jun 2021 14:31:00 -0400 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com ([216.205.24.124]:23754) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lpEar-0006P3-76 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 04 Jun 2021 14:30:59 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1622831451; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=O1kZdVethSQd8w4HypkAbNjfuR9lRl1iSiIggPwdb74=; b=h6WhLdhDBuSYR2PrFrlV2hF+oaIx6giOwXXwenNJWvQnS8RdjGm67Kv60I7D/CXsmX9wUD sJ26J7dNRLkb7wGIvTC94OWDxcgEFzuJdTFOikwT4yfFBU/uvP6WHZ1Y6GlNxNPMwojTIx S5MWJfbgIfpEr1M5zxjlhdwFAPIhkUs= Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-303-ewtyJ_4hPnmzB5vP0m_LTw-1; Fri, 04 Jun 2021 14:30:48 -0400 X-MC-Unique: ewtyJ_4hPnmzB5vP0m_LTw-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx03.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.13]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D193D107ACF5; Fri, 4 Jun 2021 18:30:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from redhat.com (ovpn-113-53.phx2.redhat.com [10.3.113.53]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B79AA60D06; Fri, 4 Jun 2021 18:30:32 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 4 Jun 2021 13:30:31 -0500 From: Eric Blake To: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 00/11] 64bit block-layer: part II Message-ID: <20210604183031.kvwotfxtxmlkq32m@redhat.com> References: <20210505075001.45041-1-vsementsov@virtuozzo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20210505075001.45041-1-vsementsov@virtuozzo.com> User-Agent: NeoMutt/20210205 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.13 Authentication-Results: relay.mimecast.com; auth=pass smtp.auth=CUSA124A263 smtp.mailfrom=eblake@redhat.com X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Received-SPF: pass client-ip=216.205.24.124; envelope-from=eblake@redhat.com; helo=us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com X-Spam_score_int: -31 X-Spam_score: -3.2 X-Spam_bar: --- X-Spam_report: (-3.2 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.373, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: kwolf@redhat.com, Fam Zheng , integration@gluster.org, Alberto Garcia , Pavel Dovgalyuk , qemu-block@nongnu.org, Jason Dillaman , Stefan Weil , Peter Lieven , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, mreitz@redhat.com, stefanha@redhat.com, Liu Yuan , Paolo Bonzini , John Snow , Ari Sundholm , Ronnie Sahlberg Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" On Wed, May 05, 2021 at 10:49:50AM +0300, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote: > Hi all! > > v5: rebase on master, fix block comments style and over-80 line. > 01: s/{}/()/ in subject, so that email not to be mangled. Don't worry too much about that; if it happens again on v6, I can manually fix the commit on my side or else pull the commit directly from your repo (if you provide a link) rather than via 'git am' through the mailing list. > > part II aims to update block drivers to int64_t. > > I remind that main aim of this update of the whole block-layer to 64bit > is to implement 64bit write-zeroes NBD request. > > Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy (11): I got through patches 1-6 in your v4 posting (our mails crossed), so I'll assume those are similar, and resume my review with patch 7 in this posting. -- Eric Blake, Principal Software Engineer Red Hat, Inc. +1-919-301-3266 Virtualization: qemu.org | libvirt.org