From: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
To: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
Cc: kwolf@redhat.com, Fam Zheng <fam@euphon.net>,
"open list:GLUSTER" <integration@gluster.org>,
Pavel Dovgalyuk <pavel.dovgaluk@ispras.ru>,
qemu-block@nongnu.org, Ronnie Sahlberg <ronniesahlberg@gmail.com>,
Peter Lieven <pl@kamp.de>,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org, mreitz@redhat.com, stefanha@redhat.com,
Liu Yuan <namei.unix@gmail.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>, John Snow <jsnow@redhat.com>,
Ari Sundholm <ari@tuxera.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 10/11] block: use int64_t instead of int in driver discard handlers
Date: Mon, 7 Jun 2021 13:13:50 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210607181350.2mviefspqqdsm6af@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210505075001.45041-11-vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
On Wed, May 05, 2021 at 10:50:00AM +0300, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
> We are generally moving to int64_t for both offset and bytes parameters
> on all io paths.
>
> Main motivation is realization of 64-bit write_zeroes operation for
> fast zeroing large disk chunks, up to the whole disk.
>
> We chose signed type, to be consistent with off_t (which is signed) and
> with possibility for signed return type (where negative value means
> error).
>
> So, convert driver discard handlers bytes parameter to int64_t.
>
> The only caller of all updated function is bdrv_co_pdiscard in
> block/io.c. It is already prepared to work with 64bit requests, but
> pass at most max(bs->bl.max_pdiscard, INT_MAX) to the driver.
>
> Let's look at all updated functions:
>
> backup-top: pass to bdrv_co_pdiscard which is 64bit
and to backup_top_cbw, but that is also 64-bit
>
> blkdebug: all calculations are still OK, thanks to
> bdrv_check_qiov_request().
> both rule_check and bdrv_co_pdiscard are 64bit
>
> blklogwrites: pass to blk_loc_writes_co_log which is 64bit
>
> blkreply, copy-on-read, filter-compress: pass to bdrv_co_pdiscard, OK
blkreplay
>
> file-posix: one handler calls raw_account_discard() is 64bit and both
> handlers calls raw_do_pdiscard(). Update raw_do_pdiscard, which pass
> to RawPosixAIOData::aio_nbytes, which is 64bit (and calls
> raw_account_discard())
>
> gluster: somehow, third argument of glfs_discard_async is size_t.
> Let's set max_pdiscard accordingly.
>
> iscsi: iscsi_allocmap_set_invalid is 64bit,
> !is_byte_request_lun_aligned is 64bit.
> list.num is uint32_t. Let's clarify max_pdiscard and
> pdiscard_alignment.
The patch tweaks max_pdiscard, but doesn't change pdiscard_alignment.
>
> mirror_top, preallocate: pass to bdrv_mirror_top_do_write() which is
> 64bit
file is mirror.c, not mirror-top.c. But it matches the BlockDriver
bdrv_mirror_top name. preallocate does not call
bdrv_mirror_top_do_write, so it's probably worth separating that line
out.
>
> nbd: protocol limitation. max_pdiscard is alredy set strict enough,
> keep it as is for now.
>
> nvmd: buf.nlb is uint32_t and we do shift. So, add corresponding limits
> to nvme_refresh_limits().
nvme
>
> qcow2: calculations are still OK, thanks to bdrv_check_qiov_request(),
> qcow2_cluster_discard() is 64bit.
>
> raw-format: raw_adjust_offset() is 64bit, bdrv_co_pdiscard too.
>
> sheepdog: the format is deprecated. Don't care and just make old
> INT_MAX limit to be explicit
>
> throttle: pass to bdrv_co_pdiscard() which is 64bit and to
> throttle_group_co_io_limits_intercept() which is 64bit as well.
>
> test-block-iothread: bytes argument is unused
>
> Great! Now all drivers are prepared to 64bit discard requests or has
> explicit max_pdiscard limit.
are prepared to handle 64-bit discard requests, or else have explicit
max_pdiscard limits.
>
> Signed-off-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
> ---
> include/block/block_int.h | 2 +-
> block/backup-top.c | 2 +-
> block/blkdebug.c | 2 +-
> block/blklogwrites.c | 4 ++--
> block/blkreplay.c | 2 +-
> block/copy-on-read.c | 2 +-
> block/file-posix.c | 7 ++++---
> block/filter-compress.c | 2 +-
> block/gluster.c | 7 +++++--
> block/iscsi.c | 10 +++++-----
> block/mirror.c | 2 +-
> block/nbd.c | 6 ++++--
> block/nvme.c | 14 +++++++++++++-
> block/preallocate.c | 2 +-
> block/qcow2.c | 2 +-
> block/raw-format.c | 2 +-
> block/sheepdog.c | 15 ++++++++++++++-
> block/throttle.c | 2 +-
> tests/unit/test-block-iothread.c | 2 +-
> block/trace-events | 4 ++--
> 20 files changed, 61 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)
>
> +++ b/block/gluster.c
> @@ -891,6 +891,7 @@ out:
> static void qemu_gluster_refresh_limits(BlockDriverState *bs, Error **errp)
> {
> bs->bl.max_transfer = GLUSTER_MAX_TRANSFER;
> + bs->bl.max_pdiscard = SIZE_MAX;
We probably want this to be MIN(GLUSTER_MAX_TRANSFER, SIZE_MAX). Also,
do we want to round it down to alignment boundaries?
> +++ b/block/iscsi.c
> @@ -1141,7 +1141,8 @@ iscsi_getlength(BlockDriverState *bs)
> }
>
> static int
> -coroutine_fn iscsi_co_pdiscard(BlockDriverState *bs, int64_t offset, int bytes)
> +coroutine_fn iscsi_co_pdiscard(BlockDriverState *bs, int64_t offset,
> + int64_t bytes)
> {
> IscsiLun *iscsilun = bs->opaque;
> struct IscsiTask iTask;
Did you want to add some sort of assert(bytes / iscsilun->block_size
<= UINT32_MAX), or a comment that we are relying on bl.max_pdiscard?
> +++ b/block/sheepdog.c
> +static void sd_refresh_limits(BlockDriverState *bs, Error **errp)
> +{
> + bs->bl.max_pdiscard = INT_MAX;
Do we want to round this down to alignment?
Looks close!
--
Eric Blake, Principal Software Engineer
Red Hat, Inc. +1-919-301-3266
Virtualization: qemu.org | libvirt.org
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-06-07 18:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-05-05 7:49 [PATCH v5 00/11] 64bit block-layer: part II Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2021-05-05 7:49 ` [PATCH v5 01/11] block/io: bring request check to bdrv_co_(read, write)v_vmstate Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy via
2021-05-05 7:49 ` [PATCH v5 02/11] qcow2: check request on vmstate save/load path Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2021-05-05 7:49 ` [PATCH v5 03/11] block: use int64_t instead of uint64_t in driver read handlers Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2021-05-05 7:49 ` [PATCH v5 04/11] block: use int64_t instead of uint64_t in driver write handlers Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2021-05-05 7:49 ` [PATCH v5 05/11] block: use int64_t instead of uint64_t in copy_range driver handlers Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2021-05-05 7:49 ` [PATCH v5 06/11] block: make BlockLimits::max_pwrite_zeroes 64bit Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2021-05-05 7:49 ` [PATCH v5 07/11] block: use int64_t instead of int in driver write_zeroes handlers Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2021-06-04 20:09 ` Eric Blake
2021-06-05 13:50 ` Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2021-05-05 7:49 ` [PATCH v5 08/11] block/io: allow 64bit write-zeroes requests Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2021-06-07 15:03 ` Eric Blake
2021-05-05 7:49 ` [PATCH v5 09/11] block: make BlockLimits::max_pdiscard 64bit Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2021-06-07 15:05 ` Eric Blake
2021-05-05 7:50 ` [PATCH v5 10/11] block: use int64_t instead of int in driver discard handlers Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2021-06-07 18:13 ` Eric Blake [this message]
2021-06-08 8:38 ` Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2021-05-05 7:50 ` [PATCH v5 11/11] block/io: allow 64bit discard requests Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2021-06-07 18:15 ` Eric Blake
2021-05-05 8:06 ` [PATCH v5 00/11] 64bit block-layer: part II no-reply
2021-05-05 8:10 ` Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2021-06-04 18:30 ` Eric Blake
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210607181350.2mviefspqqdsm6af@redhat.com \
--to=eblake@redhat.com \
--cc=ari@tuxera.com \
--cc=fam@euphon.net \
--cc=integration@gluster.org \
--cc=jsnow@redhat.com \
--cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
--cc=mreitz@redhat.com \
--cc=namei.unix@gmail.com \
--cc=pavel.dovgaluk@ispras.ru \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=pl@kamp.de \
--cc=qemu-block@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=ronniesahlberg@gmail.com \
--cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
--cc=vsementsov@virtuozzo.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).