From: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
To: Nir Soffer <nsoffer@redhat.com>
Cc: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>,
Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>,
Nir Soffer <nirsof@gmail.com>, qemu-block <qemu-block@nongnu.org>,
QEMU Developers <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>,
Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] qemu-{img,nbd}: Don't report zeroed cluster as a hole
Date: Thu, 10 Jun 2021 13:34:43 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210610183443.clk43ngkobzyjopy@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAMRbyyukE9iTmM6OB_xAA1n6tRiRRxwKojaO5wzRwAR-8-FX3g@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, Jun 08, 2021 at 07:38:10PM +0300, Nir Soffer wrote:
> The example I provided was not detailed enough, what we actually do is:
>
> qemu-nbd .. 'json:{"driver": "qcow2", "backing": null, "file":
> {"driver": "file", "filename": "top.qcow2"}}'
>
> So there is no backing chain and allocation depth is not relevant.
> - Allocated areas should be reported with flags 0
> - Zero areas which are not holes should be reported as NBD_STATE_ZERO
> - Zero areas which are holes (not allocated in this image) should be
> reported as NBD_STATE_HOLE
Thinking about this a bit more, here's something I noticed:
$ qemu-img map --output=json -f raw base.raw
[{ "start": 0, "length": 196608, "depth": 0, "zero": false, "data": true, "offset": 0},
{ "start": 196608, "length": 65536, "depth": 0, "zero": true, "data": false, "offset": 196608}]
which matches what I've said elsewhere in this thread: the entire
image is reported as "depth":0 because the raw file is responsible for
100% of the content.
But:
$ qemu-img map --output=json -f qcow2 json:'{"driver":"qcow2","backing":null, \
"file":{"driver":"file","filename":"top.qcow2"}}'
[{ "start": 0, "length": 65536, "depth": 0, "zero": true, "data": false},
{ "start": 65536, "length": 65536, "depth": 0, "zero": false, "data": true, "offset": 327680},
{ "start": 131072, "length": 131072, "depth": 0, "zero": true, "data": false}]
also reports the entire file at "depth":0, which is misleading, since
we have just been arguing from the qemu:allocation-depth perspective
(and also from bdrv_block_status) that the qcow2 image is NOT 100%
allocated (in the sense where allocation == data comes locally).
Perhaps it might be better if we tweaked the above qemu-img map to
produce:
[{ "start": 0, "length": 65536, "depth": -1, "zero": true, "data": false},
{ "start": 65536, "length": 65536, "depth": 0, "zero": false, "data": true, "offset": 327680},
{ "start": 131072, "length": 65536, "depth": 0, "zero": true, "data": false},
{ "start": 196608, "length": 65536, "depth": -1, "zero": true, "data": false}]
that is, use "depth":-1 to explicitly denote portions of a qcow2 file
which are NOT provided locally, and which are not found anywhere in
the backing chain. In other words, make it explicit in qemu-img map
output what is possible with qemu:allocation-depth==0.
Or tweak it slightly to mean that "depth":-1 corresponds to "cluster
is not provided by the current layer, but we could not determine if it
is provided by a particular backing layer or if it was unallocated
overall". Then positive depth means we know which point in the
backing chain we deferred to, 0 is local, and negative depth means
that we defer to a backing layer (but could not report WHICH layer, if
any). This tweak would make it easier for my thoughts of having qemu
NBD clients automatically request qemu:allocation-depth without having
to resort to x-dirty-bitmap hacks, and still be able to expose the
information via qemu-img map.
I'm off to another round of code hacking to see how it looks...
--
Eric Blake, Principal Software Engineer
Red Hat, Inc. +1-919-301-3266
Virtualization: qemu.org | libvirt.org
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-06-10 18:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-06-07 20:22 [PATCH] qemu-{img,nbd}: Don't report zeroed cluster as a hole Nir Soffer
2021-06-07 21:22 ` Eric Blake
2021-06-07 22:04 ` Eric Blake
2021-06-08 16:38 ` Nir Soffer
2021-06-08 18:45 ` Eric Blake
2021-06-08 20:42 ` Nir Soffer
2021-06-10 18:34 ` Eric Blake [this message]
2021-06-10 20:09 ` Nir Soffer
2021-06-10 20:46 ` Eric Blake
2021-06-11 8:09 ` Kevin Wolf
2021-06-11 8:14 ` Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2021-06-11 9:05 ` Nir Soffer
2021-06-11 11:14 ` Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2021-06-11 11:21 ` Kevin Wolf
2021-06-11 13:04 ` Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2021-06-11 13:31 ` Eric Blake
2021-06-11 13:28 ` Eric Blake
2021-06-11 17:35 ` Nir Soffer
2021-06-11 18:34 ` Eric Blake
2021-06-11 21:23 ` Nir Soffer
2021-06-11 21:41 ` Eric Blake
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210610183443.clk43ngkobzyjopy@redhat.com \
--to=eblake@redhat.com \
--cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
--cc=mreitz@redhat.com \
--cc=nirsof@gmail.com \
--cc=nsoffer@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-block@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=vsementsov@virtuozzo.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).