From: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>
To: Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>
Cc: virtio-fs@redhat.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org,
Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>,
"Dr . David Alan Gilbert" <dgilbert@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/9] virtiofsd: Allow using file handles instead of O_PATH FDs
Date: Fri, 11 Jun 2021 15:19:25 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210611191925.GA767764@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210609155551.44437-1-mreitz@redhat.com>
On Wed, Jun 09, 2021 at 05:55:42PM +0200, Max Reitz wrote:
> Hi,
>
> v1 cover letter for an overview:
> https://listman.redhat.com/archives/virtio-fs/2021-June/msg00033.html
Hi Max,
What's the impact of these patches on performance? Just trying to
get some idea what to expect. Performance remains more or less
same or we expect a hit.
Thanks
Vivek
>
> In v2, I (tried to) fix the bug Dave found, which is that
> get_file_handle() indiscriminately opened the given dirfd/name
> combination to get an O_RDONLY fd without checking whether we’re
> actually allowed to open dirfd/name; namely, we don’t allow ourselves to
> open files that aren’t regular files or directories.
>
> So that openat(.., O_RDONLY) is changed to an openat(..., O_PATH), and
> then check the file type with the statx() we’re doing anyway. If the
> file is OK to open, we reopen it O_RDONLY with the help of
> /proc/self/fd, like we always do.
>
> (This only affects patch 8.)
>
>
> git-backport-diff against v1:
>
> Key:
> [----] : patches are identical
> [####] : number of functional differences between upstream/downstream patch
> [down] : patch is downstream-only
> The flags [FC] indicate (F)unctional and (C)ontextual differences, respectively
>
> 001/9:[----] [--] 'virtiofsd: Add TempFd structure'
> 002/9:[----] [--] 'virtiofsd: Use lo_inode_open() instead of openat()'
> 003/9:[----] [--] 'virtiofsd: Add lo_inode_fd() helper'
> 004/9:[----] [--] 'virtiofsd: Let lo_fd() return a TempFd'
> 005/9:[----] [--] 'virtiofsd: Let lo_inode_open() return a TempFd'
> 006/9:[----] [--] 'virtiofsd: Add lo_inode.fhandle'
> 007/9:[----] [--] 'virtiofsd: Add inodes_by_handle hash table'
> 008/9:[0045] [FC] 'virtiofsd: Optionally fill lo_inode.fhandle'
> 009/9:[----] [--] 'virtiofsd: Add lazy lo_do_find()'
>
>
> Max Reitz (9):
> virtiofsd: Add TempFd structure
> virtiofsd: Use lo_inode_open() instead of openat()
> virtiofsd: Add lo_inode_fd() helper
> virtiofsd: Let lo_fd() return a TempFd
> virtiofsd: Let lo_inode_open() return a TempFd
> virtiofsd: Add lo_inode.fhandle
> virtiofsd: Add inodes_by_handle hash table
> virtiofsd: Optionally fill lo_inode.fhandle
> virtiofsd: Add lazy lo_do_find()
>
> tools/virtiofsd/helper.c | 3 +
> tools/virtiofsd/passthrough_ll.c | 836 +++++++++++++++++++++-----
> tools/virtiofsd/passthrough_seccomp.c | 2 +
> 3 files changed, 694 insertions(+), 147 deletions(-)
>
> --
> 2.31.1
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-06-11 19:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-06-09 15:55 [PATCH v2 0/9] virtiofsd: Allow using file handles instead of O_PATH FDs Max Reitz
2021-06-09 15:55 ` [PATCH v2 1/9] virtiofsd: Add TempFd structure Max Reitz
2021-06-09 15:55 ` [PATCH v2 2/9] virtiofsd: Use lo_inode_open() instead of openat() Max Reitz
2021-06-09 15:55 ` [PATCH v2 3/9] virtiofsd: Add lo_inode_fd() helper Max Reitz
2021-06-09 15:55 ` [PATCH v2 4/9] virtiofsd: Let lo_fd() return a TempFd Max Reitz
2021-06-09 15:55 ` [PATCH v2 5/9] virtiofsd: Let lo_inode_open() " Max Reitz
2021-06-09 15:55 ` [PATCH v2 6/9] virtiofsd: Add lo_inode.fhandle Max Reitz
2021-06-09 15:55 ` [PATCH v2 7/9] virtiofsd: Add inodes_by_handle hash table Max Reitz
2021-06-11 20:04 ` [Virtio-fs] " Vivek Goyal
2021-06-16 13:38 ` Max Reitz
2021-06-17 21:21 ` Vivek Goyal
2021-06-18 8:28 ` Max Reitz
2021-06-18 18:29 ` Vivek Goyal
2021-06-21 9:02 ` Max Reitz
2021-06-21 15:51 ` Vivek Goyal
2021-06-21 17:07 ` Max Reitz
2021-06-21 21:27 ` Vivek Goyal
2021-07-13 15:07 ` Max Reitz
2021-07-20 14:50 ` Vivek Goyal
2021-07-21 8:29 ` Max Reitz
2021-06-18 8:30 ` Max Reitz
2021-06-09 15:55 ` [PATCH v2 8/9] virtiofsd: Optionally fill lo_inode.fhandle Max Reitz
2021-06-09 15:55 ` [PATCH v2 9/9] virtiofsd: Add lazy lo_do_find() Max Reitz
2021-06-11 19:19 ` Vivek Goyal [this message]
2021-06-16 13:41 ` [PATCH v2 0/9] virtiofsd: Allow using file handles instead of O_PATH FDs Max Reitz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210611191925.GA767764@redhat.com \
--to=vgoyal@redhat.com \
--cc=dgilbert@redhat.com \
--cc=mreitz@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
--cc=virtio-fs@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).