From: Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>
To: qemu-block@nongnu.org
Cc: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>
Subject: [PATCH 0/6] block: block-status cache for data regions
Date: Thu, 17 Jun 2021 17:52:41 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210617155247.442150-1-mreitz@redhat.com> (raw)
Hi,
We’ve already had two attempts at introducing a block-status cache for
data regions
(https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2019-01/msg06451.html,
"file-posix: Cache lseek result for data regions";
https://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-block/2021-02/msg00934.html,
"file-posix: Cache next hole"), both of which were local to file-posix.
I have a gitlab issue assigned to me
(https://gitlab.com/qemu-project/qemu/-/issues/307), so I suppose it’s
time for round three.
This series tries to address what I gathered from the reviews for both:
(1) We should try to have this cache in the general block layer for all
protocol drivers; (2) Just to be sure, we should have a mutex for it;
(3) External writers don’t matter if we just cache data regions, because
(for a protocol node) reporting a zero region as data isn’t fatal.
Patch 1 is clean-up, patch 2 is the main one, patches 3 to 6 make it
more useful: Some protocol drivers force-clamp the returned *pnum based
on the @bytes parameter, but that’s completely unnecessary, because
bdrv_co_block_status() will clamp the value, too. It’s beneficial to
return as large a *pnum value as possible to bdrv_co_block_status(), so
our cache can be more effective.
Max Reitz (6):
block: Drop BDS comment regarding bdrv_append()
block: block-status cache for data regions
block/file-posix: Do not force-cap *pnum
block/gluster: Do not force-cap *pnum
block/nbd: Do not force-cap *pnum
block/iscsi: Do not force-cap *pnum
include/block/block_int.h | 21 ++++++++--
block.c | 2 +
block/file-posix.c | 7 ++--
block/gluster.c | 7 ++--
block/io.c | 80 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
block/iscsi.c | 3 --
block/nbd.c | 2 +-
7 files changed, 105 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
--
2.31.1
next reply other threads:[~2021-06-17 15:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-06-17 15:52 Max Reitz [this message]
2021-06-17 15:52 ` [PATCH 1/6] block: Drop BDS comment regarding bdrv_append() Max Reitz
2021-06-18 17:42 ` Eric Blake
2021-06-19 9:38 ` Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2021-06-17 15:52 ` [PATCH 2/6] block: block-status cache for data regions Max Reitz
2021-06-18 18:51 ` Eric Blake
2021-06-21 9:37 ` Max Reitz
2021-06-19 10:20 ` Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2021-06-21 10:05 ` Max Reitz
2021-06-17 15:52 ` [PATCH 3/6] block/file-posix: Do not force-cap *pnum Max Reitz
2021-06-18 20:16 ` Eric Blake
2021-06-21 9:38 ` Max Reitz
2021-06-19 10:32 ` Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2021-06-17 15:52 ` [PATCH 4/6] block/gluster: " Max Reitz
2021-06-18 20:17 ` Eric Blake
2021-06-19 10:36 ` Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2021-06-21 9:47 ` Max Reitz
2021-06-17 15:52 ` [PATCH 5/6] block/nbd: " Max Reitz
2021-06-18 20:20 ` Eric Blake
2021-06-19 11:12 ` Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2021-06-19 10:53 ` Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2021-06-21 9:50 ` Max Reitz
2021-06-21 18:54 ` Eric Blake
2021-06-21 18:53 ` Eric Blake
2021-06-22 9:07 ` Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2021-06-17 15:52 ` [PATCH 6/6] block/iscsi: " Max Reitz
2021-06-18 20:20 ` Eric Blake
2021-06-19 11:13 ` Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210617155247.442150-1-mreitz@redhat.com \
--to=mreitz@redhat.com \
--cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-block@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).