qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>
To: qemu-block@nongnu.org
Cc: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>,
	Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>,
	Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>,
	qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 0/6] block: block-status cache for data regions
Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2021 17:01:37 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210623150143.188184-1-mreitz@redhat.com> (raw)

Hi,

See the cover letter from v1 for the general idea:

https://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-block/2021-06/msg00843.html


The biggest change here in v2 is that instead of having a common CoMutex
protect the block-status cache, we’re using RCU now.  So to read from
the cache, or even to invalidate it, no lock is needed, only to update
it with new data.

Disclaimer: I have no experience with RCU in practice so far, neither in
qemu nor anywhere else.  So I hope I’ve used it correctly...


Differences to v1 in detail:
- Patch 2:
  - Moved BdrvBlockStatusCache.lock up to BDS, it is now the RCU writer
    lock
  - BDS.block_status_cache is now a pointer, so it can be replaced with
    RCU
  - Moved all cache access functionality into helper functions
    (bdrv_bsc_is_data(), bdrv_bsc_invalidate_range(), bdrv_bsc_fill())
    in block.c
  - Guard BSC accesses with RCU
    (BSC.valid is to be accessed atomically, which allows resetting it
    without taking an RCU write lock)
  - Check QLIST_EMPTY(&bs->children) not just when reading from the
    cache, but when filling it, too (so we don’t need an RCU update when
    it won’t make sense)
- Patch 3: Added
- Dropped the block/nbd patch (because it would make NBD query a larger
  range; the patch’s intent was to get more information for free, which
  this would not be)


git-backport-diff against v1:

Key:
[----] : patches are identical
[####] : number of functional differences between upstream/downstream patch
[down] : patch is downstream-only
The flags [FC] indicate (F)unctional and (C)ontextual differences, respectively

001/6:[----] [--] 'block: Drop BDS comment regarding bdrv_append()'
002/6:[0169] [FC] 'block: block-status cache for data regions'
003/6:[down] 'block: Clarify that @bytes is no limit on *pnum'
004/6:[----] [--] 'block/file-posix: Do not force-cap *pnum'
005/6:[----] [--] 'block/gluster: Do not force-cap *pnum'
006/6:[----] [--] 'block/iscsi: Do not force-cap *pnum'


Max Reitz (6):
  block: Drop BDS comment regarding bdrv_append()
  block: block-status cache for data regions
  block: Clarify that @bytes is no limit on *pnum
  block/file-posix: Do not force-cap *pnum
  block/gluster: Do not force-cap *pnum
  block/iscsi: Do not force-cap *pnum

 include/block/block_int.h | 54 +++++++++++++++++++++++--
 block.c                   | 84 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 block/file-posix.c        |  7 ++--
 block/gluster.c           |  7 ++--
 block/io.c                | 61 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
 block/iscsi.c             |  3 --
 6 files changed, 200 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)

-- 
2.31.1



             reply	other threads:[~2021-06-23 15:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-06-23 15:01 Max Reitz [this message]
2021-06-23 15:01 ` [PATCH v2 1/6] block: Drop BDS comment regarding bdrv_append() Max Reitz
2021-06-23 15:01 ` [PATCH v2 2/6] block: block-status cache for data regions Max Reitz
2021-06-24 10:05   ` Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2021-06-24 11:11     ` Max Reitz
2021-07-06 17:04   ` Kevin Wolf
2021-07-12  7:45     ` Max Reitz
2021-06-23 15:01 ` [PATCH v2 3/6] block: Clarify that @bytes is no limit on *pnum Max Reitz
2021-06-24  9:15   ` Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2021-06-24 10:16     ` Max Reitz
2021-06-24 10:25       ` Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2021-06-24 11:12         ` Max Reitz
2021-06-28 19:10       ` Eric Blake
2021-07-12  7:47         ` Max Reitz
2021-06-23 15:01 ` [PATCH v2 4/6] block/file-posix: Do not force-cap *pnum Max Reitz
2021-06-23 15:01 ` [PATCH v2 5/6] block/gluster: " Max Reitz
2021-06-23 15:01 ` [PATCH v2 6/6] block/iscsi: " Max Reitz
2021-07-06 17:06 ` [PATCH v2 0/6] block: block-status cache for data regions Kevin Wolf

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210623150143.188184-1-mreitz@redhat.com \
    --to=mreitz@redhat.com \
    --cc=eblake@redhat.com \
    --cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
    --cc=qemu-block@nongnu.org \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=vsementsov@virtuozzo.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).