From: Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>
To: Yanan Wang <wangyanan55@huawei.com>
Cc: "Daniel P . Berrangé" <berrange@redhat.com>,
"Eduardo Habkost" <ehabkost@redhat.com>,
"Michael S . Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
wanghaibin.wang@huawei.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org,
"Igor Mammedov" <imammedo@redhat.com>,
yuzenghui@huawei.com, "Paolo Bonzini" <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/6] machine: Set the value of maxcpus to match cpus if specified as zero
Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2021 16:57:37 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210712145737.6gsawrmzbicgdevx@gator> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210702100739.13672-2-wangyanan55@huawei.com>
On Fri, Jul 02, 2021 at 06:07:34PM +0800, Yanan Wang wrote:
> It is currently allowed to explicitly specified the topology parameters
> as 0 in the -smp cmdlines, such as -smp cpus=8,maxcpus=0,sockets=0. And
> for the values of cpus/sockets/cores/threads, we always determine that
> they are ommited if either set to 0 in the cmdline(e.g. sockets=0) or
> just not explicitly specified, then we compute the ommited values.
>
> We probably should also treat "maxcpus=0" as ommited and then set the
> value to match smp cpus. This makes cmdlines like "-smp 8, maxcpus=0"
> start to work as "-smp 8,maxcpus=8,sockets=8,cores=1,threads=1".
>
> Note that this patch won't affect any existing working cmdlines, but
> will allow configuration like "-smp cpus=n,maxcpus=0" to be valid.
Personally, I'd rather see -smp cpus=n,sockets=0 become an error than to
"fix" -smp cpus=n,maxcpus=0.
Thanks,
drew
>
> Signed-off-by: Yanan Wang <wangyanan55@huawei.com>
> ---
> hw/core/machine.c | 14 ++++++++------
> hw/i386/pc.c | 14 ++++++++------
> 2 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/hw/core/machine.c b/hw/core/machine.c
> index ffc076ae84..f17bbe3275 100644
> --- a/hw/core/machine.c
> +++ b/hw/core/machine.c
> @@ -745,6 +745,7 @@ static void smp_parse(MachineState *ms, SMPConfiguration *config, Error **errp)
> unsigned sockets = config->has_sockets ? config->sockets : 0;
> unsigned cores = config->has_cores ? config->cores : 0;
> unsigned threads = config->has_threads ? config->threads : 0;
> + unsigned maxcpus = config->has_maxcpus ? config->maxcpus : 0;
>
> if (config->has_dies && config->dies != 0 && config->dies != 1) {
> error_setg(errp, "dies not supported by this machine's CPU topology");
> @@ -758,8 +759,8 @@ static void smp_parse(MachineState *ms, SMPConfiguration *config, Error **errp)
> sockets = sockets > 0 ? sockets : 1;
> cpus = cores * threads * sockets;
> } else {
> - ms->smp.max_cpus = config->has_maxcpus ? config->maxcpus : cpus;
> - sockets = ms->smp.max_cpus / (cores * threads);
> + maxcpus = maxcpus > 0 ? maxcpus : cpus;
> + sockets = maxcpus / (cores * threads);
> }
> } else if (cores == 0) {
> threads = threads > 0 ? threads : 1;
> @@ -776,19 +777,19 @@ static void smp_parse(MachineState *ms, SMPConfiguration *config, Error **errp)
> return;
> }
>
> - ms->smp.max_cpus = config->has_maxcpus ? config->maxcpus : cpus;
> + maxcpus = maxcpus > 0 ? maxcpus : cpus;
>
> - if (ms->smp.max_cpus < cpus) {
> + if (maxcpus < cpus) {
> error_setg(errp, "maxcpus must be equal to or greater than smp");
> return;
> }
>
> - if (sockets * cores * threads != ms->smp.max_cpus) {
> + if (sockets * cores * threads != maxcpus) {
> error_setg(errp, "Invalid CPU topology: "
> "sockets (%u) * cores (%u) * threads (%u) "
> "!= maxcpus (%u)",
> sockets, cores, threads,
> - ms->smp.max_cpus);
> + maxcpus);
> return;
> }
>
> @@ -796,6 +797,7 @@ static void smp_parse(MachineState *ms, SMPConfiguration *config, Error **errp)
> ms->smp.cores = cores;
> ms->smp.threads = threads;
> ms->smp.sockets = sockets;
> + ms->smp.max_cpus = maxcpus;
> }
>
> static void machine_class_init(ObjectClass *oc, void *data)
> diff --git a/hw/i386/pc.c b/hw/i386/pc.c
> index 8e1220db72..a9b22fdc01 100644
> --- a/hw/i386/pc.c
> +++ b/hw/i386/pc.c
> @@ -717,6 +717,7 @@ static void pc_smp_parse(MachineState *ms, SMPConfiguration *config, Error **err
> unsigned dies = config->has_dies ? config->dies : 1;
> unsigned cores = config->has_cores ? config->cores : 0;
> unsigned threads = config->has_threads ? config->threads : 0;
> + unsigned maxcpus = config->has_maxcpus ? config->maxcpus : 0;
>
> /* compute missing values, prefer sockets over cores over threads */
> if (cpus == 0 || sockets == 0) {
> @@ -726,8 +727,8 @@ static void pc_smp_parse(MachineState *ms, SMPConfiguration *config, Error **err
> sockets = sockets > 0 ? sockets : 1;
> cpus = cores * threads * dies * sockets;
> } else {
> - ms->smp.max_cpus = config->has_maxcpus ? config->maxcpus : cpus;
> - sockets = ms->smp.max_cpus / (cores * threads * dies);
> + maxcpus = maxcpus > 0 ? maxcpus : cpus;
> + sockets = maxcpus / (dies * cores * threads);
> }
> } else if (cores == 0) {
> threads = threads > 0 ? threads : 1;
> @@ -744,19 +745,19 @@ static void pc_smp_parse(MachineState *ms, SMPConfiguration *config, Error **err
> return;
> }
>
> - ms->smp.max_cpus = config->has_maxcpus ? config->maxcpus : cpus;
> + maxcpus = maxcpus > 0 ? maxcpus : cpus;
>
> - if (ms->smp.max_cpus < cpus) {
> + if (maxcpus < cpus) {
> error_setg(errp, "maxcpus must be equal to or greater than smp");
> return;
> }
>
> - if (sockets * dies * cores * threads != ms->smp.max_cpus) {
> + if (sockets * dies * cores * threads != maxcpus) {
> error_setg(errp, "Invalid CPU topology deprecated: "
> "sockets (%u) * dies (%u) * cores (%u) * threads (%u) "
> "!= maxcpus (%u)",
> sockets, dies, cores, threads,
> - ms->smp.max_cpus);
> + maxcpus);
> return;
> }
>
> @@ -765,6 +766,7 @@ static void pc_smp_parse(MachineState *ms, SMPConfiguration *config, Error **err
> ms->smp.threads = threads;
> ms->smp.sockets = sockets;
> ms->smp.dies = dies;
> + ms->smp.max_cpus = maxcpus;
> }
>
> static
> --
> 2.19.1
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-07-12 15:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-07-02 10:07 [RFC PATCH 0/6] machine: smp parsing fixes and improvement Yanan Wang
2021-07-02 10:07 ` [RFC PATCH 1/6] machine: Set the value of maxcpus to match cpus if specified as zero Yanan Wang
2021-07-12 14:57 ` Andrew Jones [this message]
2021-07-12 15:27 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2021-07-02 10:07 ` [RFC PATCH 2/6] machine: Perform zero-check for the computed value of sockets Yanan Wang
2021-07-12 15:00 ` Andrew Jones
2021-07-12 15:30 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2021-07-13 6:56 ` wangyanan (Y)
2021-07-02 10:07 ` [RFC PATCH 3/6] pc/machine: Perform zero-check for the value of -smp dies Yanan Wang
2021-07-12 15:04 ` Andrew Jones
2021-07-12 15:05 ` Andrew Jones
2021-07-12 15:27 ` Andrew Jones
2021-07-13 6:46 ` wangyanan (Y)
2021-07-02 10:07 ` [RFC PATCH 4/6] machine: Uniformly use maxcpus to calculate the missing values Yanan Wang
2021-07-12 15:25 ` Andrew Jones
2021-07-13 7:25 ` wangyanan (Y)
2021-07-13 7:49 ` wangyanan (Y)
2021-07-02 10:07 ` [RFC PATCH 5/6] pc/machine: Disallow any configuration of dies for non-PC machines Yanan Wang
2021-07-02 10:18 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2021-07-05 9:03 ` wangyanan (Y)
2021-07-02 10:07 ` [RFC PATCH 6/6] machine: Tweak the order of topology members in struct CpuTopology Yanan Wang
2021-07-12 15:29 ` Andrew Jones
2021-07-12 19:46 ` Pankaj Gupta
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210712145737.6gsawrmzbicgdevx@gator \
--to=drjones@redhat.com \
--cc=berrange@redhat.com \
--cc=ehabkost@redhat.com \
--cc=imammedo@redhat.com \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=wanghaibin.wang@huawei.com \
--cc=wangyanan55@huawei.com \
--cc=yuzenghui@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).