From: Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>
To: Yanan Wang <wangyanan55@huawei.com>
Cc: "Daniel P . Berrangé" <berrange@redhat.com>,
"Eduardo Habkost" <ehabkost@redhat.com>,
"Michael S . Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
wanghaibin.wang@huawei.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org,
"Igor Mammedov" <imammedo@redhat.com>,
yuzenghui@huawei.com, "Paolo Bonzini" <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 2/6] machine: Perform zero-check for the computed value of sockets
Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2021 17:00:48 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210712150048.mstqbseixgdxakkf@gator> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210702100739.13672-3-wangyanan55@huawei.com>
On Fri, Jul 02, 2021 at 06:07:35PM +0800, Yanan Wang wrote:
> We currently perform zero-check (default the value to 1 if zeroed)
> for the computed values of cores/threads, to make sure they are at
> least 1. For consistency, we probably should also default sockets
> to 1 if the computed value is zero. Note that this won't affect
> any existing working cmdlines but will improve the error reporting
> of the invalid ones such as "-smp 8,maxcpus=9,cores=10,threads=1".
How does this help error checking? If the user input values that compute a
fractional (rounded down to zero with integer division) value, then we'll
catch that with the sockets*cores*threads == maxcpus test now, but we may
not catch that after this patch.
Thanks,
drew
>
> Signed-off-by: Yanan Wang <wangyanan55@huawei.com>
> ---
> hw/core/machine.c | 1 +
> hw/i386/pc.c | 1 +
> 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/hw/core/machine.c b/hw/core/machine.c
> index f17bbe3275..1e194677cd 100644
> --- a/hw/core/machine.c
> +++ b/hw/core/machine.c
> @@ -761,6 +761,7 @@ static void smp_parse(MachineState *ms, SMPConfiguration *config, Error **errp)
> } else {
> maxcpus = maxcpus > 0 ? maxcpus : cpus;
> sockets = maxcpus / (cores * threads);
> + sockets = sockets > 0 ? sockets : 1;
> }
> } else if (cores == 0) {
> threads = threads > 0 ? threads : 1;
> diff --git a/hw/i386/pc.c b/hw/i386/pc.c
> index a9b22fdc01..a44511c937 100644
> --- a/hw/i386/pc.c
> +++ b/hw/i386/pc.c
> @@ -729,6 +729,7 @@ static void pc_smp_parse(MachineState *ms, SMPConfiguration *config, Error **err
> } else {
> maxcpus = maxcpus > 0 ? maxcpus : cpus;
> sockets = maxcpus / (dies * cores * threads);
> + sockets = sockets > 0 ? sockets : 1;
> }
> } else if (cores == 0) {
> threads = threads > 0 ? threads : 1;
> --
> 2.19.1
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-07-12 15:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-07-02 10:07 [RFC PATCH 0/6] machine: smp parsing fixes and improvement Yanan Wang
2021-07-02 10:07 ` [RFC PATCH 1/6] machine: Set the value of maxcpus to match cpus if specified as zero Yanan Wang
2021-07-12 14:57 ` Andrew Jones
2021-07-12 15:27 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2021-07-02 10:07 ` [RFC PATCH 2/6] machine: Perform zero-check for the computed value of sockets Yanan Wang
2021-07-12 15:00 ` Andrew Jones [this message]
2021-07-12 15:30 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2021-07-13 6:56 ` wangyanan (Y)
2021-07-02 10:07 ` [RFC PATCH 3/6] pc/machine: Perform zero-check for the value of -smp dies Yanan Wang
2021-07-12 15:04 ` Andrew Jones
2021-07-12 15:05 ` Andrew Jones
2021-07-12 15:27 ` Andrew Jones
2021-07-13 6:46 ` wangyanan (Y)
2021-07-02 10:07 ` [RFC PATCH 4/6] machine: Uniformly use maxcpus to calculate the missing values Yanan Wang
2021-07-12 15:25 ` Andrew Jones
2021-07-13 7:25 ` wangyanan (Y)
2021-07-13 7:49 ` wangyanan (Y)
2021-07-02 10:07 ` [RFC PATCH 5/6] pc/machine: Disallow any configuration of dies for non-PC machines Yanan Wang
2021-07-02 10:18 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2021-07-05 9:03 ` wangyanan (Y)
2021-07-02 10:07 ` [RFC PATCH 6/6] machine: Tweak the order of topology members in struct CpuTopology Yanan Wang
2021-07-12 15:29 ` Andrew Jones
2021-07-12 19:46 ` Pankaj Gupta
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210712150048.mstqbseixgdxakkf@gator \
--to=drjones@redhat.com \
--cc=berrange@redhat.com \
--cc=ehabkost@redhat.com \
--cc=imammedo@redhat.com \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=wanghaibin.wang@huawei.com \
--cc=wangyanan55@huawei.com \
--cc=yuzenghui@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).