qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>
To: qemu-block@nongnu.org
Cc: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>,
	Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>,
	qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>
Subject: [PULL 5/6] block/blkdebug: remove new_state field and instead use a local variable
Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2021 19:26:57 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210719172658.715442-6-mreitz@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210719172658.715442-1-mreitz@redhat.com>

From: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>

There seems to be no benefit in using a field. Replace it with a local
variable, and move the state update before the yields.

The state update has do be done before the yields because now using
a local variable does not allow the new updated state to be visible
by the other yields.

Signed-off-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20210614082931.24925-6-eesposit@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
Signed-off-by: Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>
---
 block/blkdebug.c | 13 ++++++-------
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/block/blkdebug.c b/block/blkdebug.c
index dd82131d1e..b47c3fd97c 100644
--- a/block/blkdebug.c
+++ b/block/blkdebug.c
@@ -40,7 +40,6 @@
 
 typedef struct BDRVBlkdebugState {
     int state;
-    int new_state;
     uint64_t align;
     uint64_t max_transfer;
     uint64_t opt_write_zero;
@@ -792,7 +791,7 @@ static void suspend_request(BlockDriverState *bs, BlkdebugRule *rule)
 }
 
 static void process_rule(BlockDriverState *bs, struct BlkdebugRule *rule,
-                         int *action_count)
+                         int *action_count, int *new_state)
 {
     BDRVBlkdebugState *s = bs->opaque;
 
@@ -812,7 +811,7 @@ static void process_rule(BlockDriverState *bs, struct BlkdebugRule *rule,
         break;
 
     case ACTION_SET_STATE:
-        s->new_state = rule->options.set_state.new_state;
+        *new_state = rule->options.set_state.new_state;
         break;
 
     case ACTION_SUSPEND:
@@ -825,21 +824,21 @@ static void blkdebug_debug_event(BlockDriverState *bs, BlkdebugEvent event)
 {
     BDRVBlkdebugState *s = bs->opaque;
     struct BlkdebugRule *rule, *next;
+    int new_state;
     int actions_count[ACTION__MAX] = { 0 };
 
     assert((int)event >= 0 && event < BLKDBG__MAX);
 
-    s->new_state = s->state;
+    new_state = s->state;
     QLIST_FOREACH_SAFE(rule, &s->rules[event], next, next) {
-        process_rule(bs, rule, actions_count);
+        process_rule(bs, rule, actions_count, &new_state);
     }
+    s->state = new_state;
 
     while (actions_count[ACTION_SUSPEND] > 0) {
         qemu_coroutine_yield();
         actions_count[ACTION_SUSPEND]--;
     }
-
-    s->state = s->new_state;
 }
 
 static int blkdebug_debug_breakpoint(BlockDriverState *bs, const char *event,
-- 
2.31.1



  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-07-19 17:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-07-19 17:26 [PULL 0/6] Block patches for 6.1-rc0 Max Reitz
2021-07-19 17:26 ` [PULL 1/6] blkdebug: refactor removal of a suspended request Max Reitz
2021-07-19 17:26 ` [PULL 2/6] blkdebug: move post-resume handling to resume_req_by_tag Max Reitz
2021-07-19 17:26 ` [PULL 3/6] blkdebug: track all actions Max Reitz
2021-07-19 17:26 ` [PULL 4/6] blkdebug: do not suspend in the middle of QLIST_FOREACH_SAFE Max Reitz
2021-07-19 17:26 ` Max Reitz [this message]
2021-07-19 17:26 ` [PULL 6/6] blkdebug: protect rules and suspended_reqs with a lock Max Reitz
2021-07-20  9:02 ` [PULL 0/6] Block patches for 6.1-rc0 Peter Maydell

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210719172658.715442-6-mreitz@redhat.com \
    --to=mreitz@redhat.com \
    --cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
    --cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
    --cc=qemu-block@nongnu.org \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).