From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.0 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_INVALID, DKIM_SIGNED,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D92B0C07E95 for ; Tue, 20 Jul 2021 01:14:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 47791600D1 for ; Tue, 20 Jul 2021 01:14:05 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 47791600D1 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Received: from localhost ([::1]:53210 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1m5eKi-0005Fn-2R for qemu-devel@archiver.kernel.org; Mon, 19 Jul 2021 21:14:04 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:60330) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1m5eJm-0004S3-Ax for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 19 Jul 2021 21:13:06 -0400 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com ([170.10.133.124]:34754) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1m5eJk-0008Ri-1T for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 19 Jul 2021 21:13:05 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1626743583; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=xVGX/8775B8QBoJPqxGcZZAMdoy13V22o+qnMlgTgf0=; b=E0zEXXUbLb/k60tnf94l+yAloO3cccprZc4evOn9h8jRmJgd6OnwkHDYp7Db0PyCVDCh4/ V2B2oWKqdLdoY+onnQcRNaOXPAWYUWe9koCMrFoOMUJYtRRESZ/JgJ0grUrKcz3NRJ0J+n A2NXJEyQl7GA7fEkh1MFZ3AK0/ELu6k= Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-508-8WBL2hRaP1irbF2DbT5ecw-1; Mon, 19 Jul 2021 21:13:01 -0400 X-MC-Unique: 8WBL2hRaP1irbF2DbT5ecw-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx03.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.13]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 239101084F54; Tue, 20 Jul 2021 01:13:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from redhat.com (ovpn-112-216.phx2.redhat.com [10.3.112.216]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A23CA60918; Tue, 20 Jul 2021 01:12:59 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2021 20:12:58 -0500 From: Eric Blake To: Thomas Huth Subject: Re: Failing iotest 206 Message-ID: <20210720011151.l66z3q5hfc7urcfv@redhat.com> References: <87d526f8-53bc-c196-6d5c-72b78a49518b@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <87d526f8-53bc-c196-6d5c-72b78a49518b@redhat.com> User-Agent: NeoMutt/20210205-614-b535a5 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.13 Authentication-Results: relay.mimecast.com; auth=pass smtp.auth=CUSA124A263 smtp.mailfrom=eblake@redhat.com X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Received-SPF: pass client-ip=170.10.133.124; envelope-from=eblake@redhat.com; helo=us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com X-Spam_score_int: -42 X-Spam_score: -4.3 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.3 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-1.469, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: berrange@redhat.com, QEMU Developers , Qemu-block Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" On Mon, Jul 19, 2021 at 10:06:01AM +0200, Thomas Huth wrote: > Hi, > > iotest 206 fails for me with: > > --- 206.out > +++ 206.out.bad > @@ -99,55 +99,19 @@ > > {"execute": "blockdev-create", "arguments": {"job-id": "job0", "options": > {"driver": "qcow2", "encrypt": {"cipher-alg": "twofish-128", "cipher-mode": > "ctr", "format": "luks", "hash-alg": "sha1", "iter-time": 10, "ivgen-alg": > "plain64", "ivgen-hash-alg": "md5", "key-secret": "keysec0"}, "file": > {"driver": "file", "filename": "TEST_DIR/PID-t.qcow2"}, "size": 33554432}}} > {"return": {}} > +Job failed: Unsupported cipher algorithm twofish-128 with ctr mode > {"execute": "job-dismiss", "arguments": {"id": "job0"}} > {"return": {}} > > Looks like it is missing a check for the availability of the corresponding > crypto stuff? Does anybody got a clue how to fix this? What system is this on? Which crypto library versions are installed? I suspect this is related to Dan's effort to speed up crypto by favoring gnutls over nettle, where the switch in favored libraries failed to account for whether twofish-128 is supported? https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2021-07/msg03886.html -- Eric Blake, Principal Software Engineer Red Hat, Inc. +1-919-301-3266 Virtualization: qemu.org | libvirt.org