From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
To: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>
Cc: Laurent Vivier <lvivier@redhat.com>,
peter.maydell@linaro.org, jusual@redhat.com,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] acpi: x86: pcihp: add support hotplug on multifunction bridges
Date: Thu, 22 Jul 2021 13:49:34 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210722133738-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210722105945.2080428-3-imammedo@redhat.com>
On Thu, Jul 22, 2021 at 06:59:45AM -0400, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> Commit 17858a1695 (hw/acpi/ich9: Set ACPI PCI hot-plug as default on Q35)
> switched PCI hotplug from native to ACPI one by default.
>
> That however breaks ihotplug on following CLI that used to work:
s/ihotplug/hotplug/ ?
> -nodefaults -machine q35 \
> -device pcie-root-port,id=pcie-root-port-0,multifunction=on,bus=pcie.0,addr=0x1,chassis=1 \
> -device pcie-root-port,id=pcie-root-port-1,port=0x1,addr=0x1.0x1,bus=pcie.0,chassis=2
>
> where PCI device is hotplugged to pcie-root-port-1 with error on guest side:
>
> ACPI BIOS Error (bug): Could not resolve symbol [^S0B.PCNT], AE_NOT_FOUND (20201113/psargs-330)
> ACPI Error: Aborting method \_SB.PCI0.PCNT due to previous error (AE_NOT_FOUND) (20201113/psparse-531)
> ACPI Error: Aborting method \_GPE._E01 due to previous error (AE_NOT_FOUND) (20201113/psparse-531)
> ACPI Error: AE_NOT_FOUND, while evaluating GPE method [_E01] (20201113/evgpe-515)
>
> cause is that QEMU's ACPI hotplug never supported functions other then 0
> and due to bug it was generating notification entries for not described
> functions.
>
> Technically there is no reason not to describe cold-plugged bridges
> (root ports) on functions other then 0, as they similaraly to bridge
> on function 0 are unpluggable.
>
> Fix consists of describing cold-plugged bridges[root ports] on functions
> other than 0.
I would add: since we need to describe multifunction devices
>
> Fixes: 17858a169508609ca9063c544833e5a1adeb7b52
use short hash and include subject within ("subject here") please
> Signed-off-by: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>
> Reported-by: Laurent Vivier <lvivier@redhat.com>
> ---
> hw/i386/acpi-build.c | 31 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
> 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/hw/i386/acpi-build.c b/hw/i386/acpi-build.c
> index b40e284b72..77cb7a338a 100644
> --- a/hw/i386/acpi-build.c
> +++ b/hw/i386/acpi-build.c
> @@ -364,7 +364,7 @@ static void build_append_pcihp_notify_entry(Aml *method, int slot)
> int32_t devfn = PCI_DEVFN(slot, 0);
>
> if_ctx = aml_if(aml_and(aml_arg(0), aml_int(0x1U << slot), NULL));
> - aml_append(if_ctx, aml_notify(aml_name("S%.02X", devfn), aml_arg(1)));
> + aml_append(if_ctx, aml_notify(aml_name("^S%.03X", devfn), aml_arg(1)));
> aml_append(method, if_ctx);
> }
>
why are you adding a parent prefix here? anything wrong with
relying on search rules?
Seems like an unrelated change.
Also there's always 8 bit in devfn. Why do we need an extra 0?
> @@ -389,18 +389,26 @@ static void build_append_pci_bus_devices(Aml *parent_scope, PCIBus *bus,
> PCIDeviceClass *pc;
> PCIDevice *pdev = bus->devices[devfn];
> int slot = PCI_SLOT(devfn);
> + int func = PCI_FUNC(devfn);
> + /* ACPI spec: 1.0b: Table 6-2 _ADR Object Bus Types, PCI type */
> + int adr = slot << 16 | func;
> bool hotplug_enabled_dev;
> bool bridge_in_acpi;
> bool cold_plugged_bridge;
>
> if (!pdev) {
> - if (bsel) { /* add hotplug slots for non present devices */
> + /*
> + * add hotplug slots for non present devices.
> + * hotplug is supported only for non-multifunction device
> + * so generate device description only for function 0
> + */
> + if (bsel && !PCI_FUNC(devfn)) {
replace with func here and elsewhere?
> if (pci_bus_is_express(bus) && slot > 0) {
> break;
> }
> - dev = aml_device("S%.02X", PCI_DEVFN(slot, 0));
> + dev = aml_device("S%.03X", devfn);
> aml_append(dev, aml_name_decl("_SUN", aml_int(slot)));
> - aml_append(dev, aml_name_decl("_ADR", aml_int(slot << 16)));
> + aml_append(dev, aml_name_decl("_ADR", aml_int(adr)));
> method = aml_method("_EJ0", 1, AML_NOTSERIALIZED);
> aml_append(method,
> aml_call2("PCEJ", aml_name("BSEL"), aml_name("_SUN"))
> @@ -436,9 +444,18 @@ static void build_append_pci_bus_devices(Aml *parent_scope, PCIBus *bus,
> continue;
> }
>
> + /*
> + * allow describing coldplugged bridges in ACPI even if they are not
> + * on function 0, as they are not unpluggale, for all other devices
unpluggable
> + * generate description only for function 0 per slot
> + */
> + if (PCI_FUNC(devfn) && !bridge_in_acpi) {
> + continue;
> + }
> +
> /* start to compose PCI slot descriptor */
> - dev = aml_device("S%.02X", PCI_DEVFN(slot, 0));
> - aml_append(dev, aml_name_decl("_ADR", aml_int(slot << 16)));
> + dev = aml_device("S%.03X", devfn);
> + aml_append(dev, aml_name_decl("_ADR", aml_int(adr)));
>
> if (bsel) {
> /*
> @@ -529,7 +546,7 @@ static void build_append_pci_bus_devices(Aml *parent_scope, PCIBus *bus,
> continue;
> }
>
> - aml_append(method, aml_name("^S%.02X.PCNT",
> + aml_append(method, aml_name("^S%.03X.PCNT",
> sec->parent_dev->devfn));
> }
> }
> --
> 2.27.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-07-22 17:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-07-22 10:59 [PATCH 0/2] acpi: pcihp: fix hotplug when bridge is wired to function > 0 Igor Mammedov
2021-07-22 10:59 ` [PATCH 1/2] acpi: x86: pcihp: cleanup devfn usage in build_append_pci_bus_devices() Igor Mammedov
2021-07-22 17:56 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2021-07-23 7:34 ` Igor Mammedov
2021-07-22 10:59 ` [PATCH 2/2] acpi: x86: pcihp: add support hotplug on multifunction bridges Igor Mammedov
2021-07-22 12:38 ` Laurent Vivier
2021-07-22 17:49 ` Michael S. Tsirkin [this message]
2021-07-22 18:13 ` Laurent Vivier
2021-07-23 7:47 ` Igor Mammedov
2021-07-23 8:05 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2021-07-23 8:33 ` Igor Mammedov
2021-07-23 8:48 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2021-07-23 9:34 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2021-07-23 8:50 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2021-07-22 17:56 ` [PATCH 0/2] acpi: pcihp: fix hotplug when bridge is wired to function > 0 Michael S. Tsirkin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210722133738-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org \
--to=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=imammedo@redhat.com \
--cc=jusual@redhat.com \
--cc=lvivier@redhat.com \
--cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).