From: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
To: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>,
qemu-block@nongnu.org, Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@gmail.com>,
Julia Suvorova <jusual@redhat.com>, Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>,
Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>,
Fabian Ebner <f.ebner@proxmox.com>,
Aarushi Mehta <mehta.aaru20@gmail.com>,
Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@redhat.com>
Subject: [PULL for-6.1 2/3] block/io_uring: resubmit when result is -EAGAIN
Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2021 17:22:38 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210729162239.932125-3-stefanha@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210729162239.932125-1-stefanha@redhat.com>
From: Fabian Ebner <f.ebner@proxmox.com>
Linux SCSI can throw spurious -EAGAIN in some corner cases in its
completion path, which will end up being the result in the completed
io_uring request.
Resubmitting such requests should allow block jobs to complete, even
if such spurious errors are encountered.
Co-authored-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Fabian Ebner <f.ebner@proxmox.com>
Message-id: 20210729091029.65369-1-f.ebner@proxmox.com
Signed-off-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
---
block/io_uring.c | 16 +++++++++++++++-
1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/block/io_uring.c b/block/io_uring.c
index 00a3ee9fb8..dfa475cc87 100644
--- a/block/io_uring.c
+++ b/block/io_uring.c
@@ -165,7 +165,21 @@ static void luring_process_completions(LuringState *s)
total_bytes = ret + luringcb->total_read;
if (ret < 0) {
- if (ret == -EINTR) {
+ /*
+ * Only writev/readv/fsync requests on regular files or host block
+ * devices are submitted. Therefore -EAGAIN is not expected but it's
+ * known to happen sometimes with Linux SCSI. Submit again and hope
+ * the request completes successfully.
+ *
+ * For more information, see:
+ * https://lore.kernel.org/io-uring/20210727165811.284510-3-axboe@kernel.dk/T/#u
+ *
+ * If the code is changed to submit other types of requests in the
+ * future, then this workaround may need to be extended to deal with
+ * genuine -EAGAIN results that should not be resubmitted
+ * immediately.
+ */
+ if (ret == -EINTR || ret == -EAGAIN) {
luring_resubmit(s, luringcb);
continue;
}
--
2.31.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-07-29 16:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-07-29 16:22 [PULL for-6.1 0/3] Block patches Stefan Hajnoczi
2021-07-29 16:22 ` [PULL for-6.1 1/3] MAINTAINERS: add Stefano Garzarella as io_uring reviewer Stefan Hajnoczi
2021-07-29 16:22 ` Stefan Hajnoczi [this message]
2021-07-29 16:22 ` [PULL for-6.1 3/3] MAINTAINERS: Added myself as a reviewer for the NVMe Block Driver Stefan Hajnoczi
2021-07-30 11:05 ` [PULL for-6.1 0/3] Block patches Peter Maydell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210729162239.932125-3-stefanha@redhat.com \
--to=stefanha@redhat.com \
--cc=f.ebner@proxmox.com \
--cc=jusual@redhat.com \
--cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
--cc=mehta.aaru20@gmail.com \
--cc=mreitz@redhat.com \
--cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
--cc=qemu-block@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=sgarzare@redhat.com \
--cc=stefanha@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).