From: Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>
To: Yanan Wang <wangyanan55@huawei.com>
Cc: "Peter Maydell" <peter.maydell@linaro.org>,
"Thomas Huth" <thuth@redhat.com>,
"Daniel P . Berrangé" <berrange@redhat.com>,
libvir-list@redhat.com, "Cornelia Huck" <cohuck@redhat.com>,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org, wanghaibin.wang@huawei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] docs/about: Unify the subject format
Date: Mon, 23 Aug 2021 11:02:46 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210823090246.oih65hbl7y63253d@gator.home> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210823030005.165668-3-wangyanan55@huawei.com>
On Mon, Aug 23, 2021 at 11:00:04AM +0800, Yanan Wang wrote:
> There is a mixture of "since/removed in X.Y" vs "since/removed in X.Y.Z"
> in the subjects in deprecated.rst/removed-features.rst. It will be better
> to use an unified format. It seems unlikely that we will ever deprecate
> something in a stable release, and even more unlikely that we'll remove
> something in one, so the short versions look like the thing we want to
> standardize on.
>
> So here we unify the subject format in deprecated.rst to "since X.Y", and
> unify the subject format in removed-features.rst to "removed in X.Y".
>
> Signed-off-by: Yanan Wang <wangyanan55@huawei.com>
> Reviewed-by: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
> ---
> docs/about/deprecated.rst | 56 ++++++++++++++++-----------------
> docs/about/removed-features.rst | 28 ++++++++---------
> 2 files changed, 42 insertions(+), 42 deletions(-)
>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-08-23 9:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-08-23 3:00 [PATCH v2 0/3] docs/about: some documentation clean-up/fix Yanan Wang
2021-08-23 3:00 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] docs/about: Remove the duplicated doc Yanan Wang
2021-08-23 5:26 ` Thomas Huth
2021-08-23 9:00 ` Andrew Jones
2021-08-23 3:00 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] docs/about: Unify the subject format Yanan Wang
2021-08-23 5:29 ` Thomas Huth
2021-08-23 9:02 ` Andrew Jones [this message]
2021-08-23 3:00 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] docs/about: Add the missing release record in the subject Yanan Wang
2021-08-23 5:30 ` Thomas Huth
2021-08-23 9:03 ` Andrew Jones
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210823090246.oih65hbl7y63253d@gator.home \
--to=drjones@redhat.com \
--cc=berrange@redhat.com \
--cc=cohuck@redhat.com \
--cc=libvir-list@redhat.com \
--cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=thuth@redhat.com \
--cc=wanghaibin.wang@huawei.com \
--cc=wangyanan55@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).