From: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Christian Zigotzky <chzigotzky@xenosoft.de>
Cc: Darren Stevens <darren@stevens-zone.net>,
mad skateman <madskateman@gmail.com>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org, "R.T.Dickinson" <rtd2@xtra.co.nz>,
linuxppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>
Subject: Re: [FSL P50x0] lscpu reports wrong values since the RC1 of kernel 5.13
Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2021 09:13:10 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210826034310.GA296102@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <c16c3747-8c6c-fb27-4e07-a893b83a5580@xenosoft.de>
* Christian Zigotzky <chzigotzky@xenosoft.de> [2021-08-16 14:29:21]:
Hi Christian,
> I tested the RC6 of kernel 5.14 today and unfortunately the issue still
> exists. We have figured out that only P5040 SoCs are affected. [1]
> P5020 SoCs display the correct values.
> Please check the CPU changes in the PowerPC updates 5.13-1 and 5.13-2.
>
Thanks for reporting the issue.
Would it be possible to try
https://lore.kernel.org/linuxppc-dev/20210821092419.167454-3-srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com/t/#u
If the above patch is not helping, then can you please collect the output of
cat /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu*/topology/core_siblings
Were all the CPUs online at the time of boot?
Did we do any CPU online/offline operations post boot?
If we did CPU online/offline, can you capture the output just after the
boot along with lscpu output..
Since this is being seen on few SOCs, can you summarize the difference
between P5040 and P5020.
>
> [1] https://forum.hyperion-entertainment.com/viewtopic.php?p=53775#p53775
>
>
> On 09 August 2021 um 02:37 pm, Christian Zigotzky wrote:
> > Hi All,
> >
> > Lscpu reports wrong values [1] since the RC1 of kernel 5.13 on my FSL
> > P5040 Cyrus+ board (A-EON AmigaOne X5000). [2]
> > The differences are:
> >
> > Since the RC1 of kernel 5.13 (wrong values):
> >
> > Core(s) per socket: 1
> > Socket(s): 3
> >
I know that the socket count was off by 1, but I cant explain how its off by
2 here.
> > Before (correct values):
> >
> > Core(s) per socket: 4
> > Socket(s): 1
> >
--
Thanks and Regards
Srikar Dronamraju
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-08-26 4:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-08-09 12:37 [FSL P50x0] lscpu reports wrong values since the RC1 of kernel 5.13 Christian Zigotzky
2021-08-16 12:29 ` Christian Zigotzky
2021-08-26 3:43 ` Srikar Dronamraju [this message]
2021-08-27 18:32 ` Christian Zigotzky
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210826034310.GA296102@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=chzigotzky@xenosoft.de \
--cc=darren@stevens-zone.net \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=madskateman@gmail.com \
--cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=rtd2@xtra.co.nz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).