From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-16.1 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER,INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3E68C432BE for ; Tue, 31 Aug 2021 10:26:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2B0886023F for ; Tue, 31 Aug 2021 10:26:54 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 mail.kernel.org 2B0886023F Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=nongnu.org Received: from localhost ([::1]:43234 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mL0yi-0001e3-UO for qemu-devel@archiver.kernel.org; Tue, 31 Aug 2021 06:26:52 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:59830) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mL0sF-0007Jm-5a for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 31 Aug 2021 06:20:11 -0400 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com ([170.10.133.124]:44074) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mL0sD-000353-7I for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 31 Aug 2021 06:20:10 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1630405208; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=msBAw3ZvKqshq2WICcsx+b/9T2Wi8pHm3imgBJKoj5Q=; b=TibV8YS5OcgkfzkpVi5GaJud80HPvsWvZEHgtCV55uTBn2/SDVspPzt6g6zSboK7E3D921 XwND99ryONoHK9kB+FyWwLtqGMxsKYX0WqaiOdZ6mdVUtO85G4DltmSei8Clrsc0A7vcGb u4n4z1jGP3LWOEgng+0leXOkjxjofK8= Received: from mail-ej1-f71.google.com (mail-ej1-f71.google.com [209.85.218.71]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-530-TzAmDXeaMhO_B8WXqIIuzQ-1; Tue, 31 Aug 2021 06:20:06 -0400 X-MC-Unique: TzAmDXeaMhO_B8WXqIIuzQ-1 Received: by mail-ej1-f71.google.com with SMTP id m18-20020a170906849200b005c701c9b87cso6929865ejx.8 for ; Tue, 31 Aug 2021 03:20:06 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=msBAw3ZvKqshq2WICcsx+b/9T2Wi8pHm3imgBJKoj5Q=; b=TSiq3tutYKhoZqdxgJuUKb73EywzrOxdTVJsotMdwgf/bmuckLrgrkrm2OuGOBGT+4 UeSOxkd9E1Ms4B/vRPwhHulinkFCF4VujD6Co0fO/UsZfXzEw0UL5iQmTqGLGWM7u7UZ 3A4f6lp3vcx6gKF+u2xrCJUeLtSJ2t7ee3mYgwkTUonMN6qL30/6eYrHSwD8/2vkIa3I TnnXIwI6ztX5zM/uuJLUj8wb0DIsoVPXl9glaC5CHgXE4ibbCI97Aqs9wd0WbVU+DeF6 vg4G4mJYmOk5w+4uDaKDEL56gnbbdRqeqKXo8M9st3W8xx34XpF75iGu0s0oxHEsKhbA ssNQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533ceiSUoVi6TTLe6OBQdz+2MxYHQY9cOrv/SSTxbZdHOE3aS/rp uu8+xxYWa201L/ea1YmHBtfNiJOuvklmJVdD1SnVL+6K/AScTzr8TALuXofxWOnr/a4lBhaoLIj MX8YkF9hPqKZs2kM= X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:3809:: with SMTP id v9mr30657263ejc.355.1630405205078; Tue, 31 Aug 2021 03:20:05 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyj7IWaBsn8UsdHvc7HdW23KmoGFe9fPmIYLXhfZiZUjjHUSjDJHP+LjeshBvaEjotEFoTc1g== X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:3809:: with SMTP id v9mr30657245ejc.355.1630405204844; Tue, 31 Aug 2021 03:20:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from gator.home (cst2-174-132.cust.vodafone.cz. [31.30.174.132]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id cr9sm9118339edb.17.2021.08.31.03.20.04 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 31 Aug 2021 03:20:04 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2021 12:20:02 +0200 From: Andrew Jones To: Shuuichirou Ishii Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 1/3] target-arm: Add support for Fujitsu A64FX Message-ID: <20210831102002.baj3yipk7ulvi32i@gator.home> References: <20210831082940.2811719-1-ishii.shuuichir@fujitsu.com> <20210831082940.2811719-2-ishii.shuuichir@fujitsu.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20210831082940.2811719-2-ishii.shuuichir@fujitsu.com> Authentication-Results: relay.mimecast.com; auth=pass smtp.auth=CUSA124A263 smtp.mailfrom=drjones@redhat.com X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Received-SPF: pass client-ip=170.10.133.124; envelope-from=drjones@redhat.com; helo=us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com X-Spam_score_int: -31 X-Spam_score: -3.2 X-Spam_bar: --- X-Spam_report: (-3.2 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.391, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: peter.maydell@linaro.org, qemu-arm@nongnu.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" On Tue, Aug 31, 2021 at 05:29:38PM +0900, Shuuichirou Ishii wrote: > Add a definition for the Fujitsu A64FX processor. > > The A64FX processor does not implement the AArch32 Execution state, > so there are no associated AArch32 Identification registers. > > For SVE, the A64FX processor supports only 128,256 and 512bit vector lengths. > > The Identification registers value are defined based on the FX700, > and have been tested and confirmed. > > Signed-off-by: Shuuichirou Ishii > --- > target/arm/cpu64.c | 48 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 48 insertions(+) > I already gave my r-b on the last posting, but here it is again Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones