qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: "Yanan Wang" <wangyanan55@huawei.com>,
	"Cornelia Huck" <cohuck@redhat.com>,
	"Daniel P . Berrangé" <berrange@redhat.com>
Subject: [PULL 02/30] machine: Deprecate "parameter=0" SMP configurations
Date: Sun,  3 Oct 2021 09:42:22 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20211003074250.60869-3-pbonzini@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211003074250.60869-1-pbonzini@redhat.com>

From: Yanan Wang <wangyanan55@huawei.com>

In the SMP configuration, we should either provide a topology
parameter with a reasonable value (greater than zero) or just
omit it and QEMU will compute the missing value.

The users shouldn't provide a configuration with any parameter
of it specified as zero (e.g. -smp 8,sockets=0) which could
possibly cause unexpected results in the -smp parsing. So we
deprecate this kind of configurations since 6.2 by adding the
explicit sanity check.

Signed-off-by: Yanan Wang <wangyanan55@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20210929025816.21076-3-wangyanan55@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
---
 docs/about/deprecated.rst | 15 +++++++++++++++
 hw/core/machine.c         | 14 ++++++++++++++
 qemu-options.hx           | 12 +++++++-----
 3 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/docs/about/deprecated.rst b/docs/about/deprecated.rst
index 2f7db9a98d..0bed6ecb1d 100644
--- a/docs/about/deprecated.rst
+++ b/docs/about/deprecated.rst
@@ -160,6 +160,21 @@ Use ``-display sdl`` instead.
 
 Use ``-display curses`` instead.
 
+``-smp`` ("parameter=0" SMP configurations) (since 6.2)
+'''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''
+
+Specified CPU topology parameters must be greater than zero.
+
+In the SMP configuration, users should either provide a CPU topology
+parameter with a reasonable value (greater than zero) or just omit it
+and QEMU will compute the missing value.
+
+However, historically it was implicitly allowed for users to provide
+a parameter with zero value, which is meaningless and could also possibly
+cause unexpected results in the -smp parsing. So support for this kind of
+configurations (e.g. -smp 8,sockets=0) is deprecated since 6.2 and will
+be removed in the near future, users have to ensure that all the topology
+members described with -smp are greater than zero.
 
 Plugin argument passing through ``arg=<string>`` (since 6.1)
 ''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''
diff --git a/hw/core/machine.c b/hw/core/machine.c
index 067f42b528..4e409261c9 100644
--- a/hw/core/machine.c
+++ b/hw/core/machine.c
@@ -835,6 +835,20 @@ static void machine_set_smp(Object *obj, Visitor *v, const char *name,
         return;
     }
 
+    /*
+     * Specified CPU topology parameters must be greater than zero,
+     * explicit configuration like "cpus=0" is not allowed.
+     */
+    if ((config->has_cpus && config->cpus == 0) ||
+        (config->has_sockets && config->sockets == 0) ||
+        (config->has_dies && config->dies == 0) ||
+        (config->has_cores && config->cores == 0) ||
+        (config->has_threads && config->threads == 0) ||
+        (config->has_maxcpus && config->maxcpus == 0)) {
+        warn_report("Deprecated CPU topology (considered invalid): "
+                    "CPU topology parameters must be greater than zero");
+    }
+
     mc->smp_parse(ms, config, errp);
     if (*errp) {
         goto out_free;
diff --git a/qemu-options.hx b/qemu-options.hx
index ceca52818a..4a092a092a 100644
--- a/qemu-options.hx
+++ b/qemu-options.hx
@@ -233,11 +233,13 @@ SRST
     of computing the CPU maximum count.
 
     Either the initial CPU count, or at least one of the topology parameters
-    must be specified. Values for any omitted parameters will be computed
-    from those which are given. Historically preference was given to the
-    coarsest topology parameters when computing missing values (ie sockets
-    preferred over cores, which were preferred over threads), however, this
-    behaviour is considered liable to change.
+    must be specified. The specified parameters must be greater than zero,
+    explicit configuration like "cpus=0" is not allowed. Values for any
+    omitted parameters will be computed from those which are given.
+    Historically preference was given to the coarsest topology parameters
+    when computing missing values (ie sockets preferred over cores, which
+    were preferred over threads), however, this behaviour is considered
+    liable to change.
 ERST
 
 DEF("numa", HAS_ARG, QEMU_OPTION_numa,
-- 
2.31.1




  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-10-03  7:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-10-03  7:42 [PULL 00/30] Misc changes for 2021-10-03 Paolo Bonzini
2021-10-03  7:42 ` [PULL 01/30] qapi/machine: Fix an incorrect comment of SMPConfiguration Paolo Bonzini
2021-10-03  7:42 ` Paolo Bonzini [this message]
2021-10-03  7:42 ` [PULL 03/30] machine: Minor refactor/fix for the smp parsers Paolo Bonzini
2021-10-03  7:42 ` [PULL 04/30] machine: Uniformly use maxcpus to calculate the omitted parameters Paolo Bonzini
2021-10-03  7:42 ` [PULL 05/30] machine: Set the value of cpus to match maxcpus if it's omitted Paolo Bonzini
2021-10-03  7:42 ` [PULL 06/30] machine: Improve the error reporting of smp parsing Paolo Bonzini
2021-10-03  7:42 ` [PULL 07/30] qtest/numa-test: Use detailed -smp CLIs in pc_dynamic_cpu_cfg Paolo Bonzini
2021-10-03  7:42 ` [PULL 08/30] qtest/numa-test: Use detailed -smp CLIs in test_def_cpu_split Paolo Bonzini
2021-10-03  7:42 ` [PULL 09/30] machine: Prefer cores over sockets in smp parsing since 6.2 Paolo Bonzini
2021-10-03  7:42 ` [PULL 10/30] machine: Use ms instead of global current_machine in sanity-check Paolo Bonzini
2021-10-03  7:42 ` [PULL 11/30] machine: Tweak the order of topology members in struct CpuTopology Paolo Bonzini
2021-10-03  7:42 ` [PULL 12/30] machine: Make smp_parse generic enough for all arches Paolo Bonzini
2021-10-03  7:42 ` [PULL 13/30] machine: Remove smp_parse callback from MachineClass Paolo Bonzini
2021-10-03  7:42 ` [PULL 14/30] machine: Move smp_prefer_sockets to struct SMPCompatProps Paolo Bonzini
2021-10-03  7:42 ` [PULL 15/30] machine: Use g_autoptr in machine_set_smp Paolo Bonzini
2021-10-03  7:42 ` [PULL 16/30] machine: Put all sanity-check in the generic SMP parser Paolo Bonzini
2021-10-03  7:42 ` [PULL 17/30] i386: Support KVM_CAP_ENFORCE_PV_FEATURE_CPUID Paolo Bonzini
2021-10-03  7:42 ` [PULL 18/30] i386: Support KVM_CAP_HYPERV_ENFORCE_CPUID Paolo Bonzini
2021-10-03  7:42 ` [PULL 19/30] i386: Move HV_APIC_ACCESS_RECOMMENDED bit setting to hyperv_fill_cpuids() Paolo Bonzini
2021-10-03  7:42 ` [PULL 20/30] i386: Implement pseudo 'hv-avic' ('hv-apicv') enlightenment Paolo Bonzini
2021-10-03  7:42 ` [PULL 21/30] i386: Make Hyper-V version id configurable Paolo Bonzini
2021-10-03  7:42 ` [PULL 22/30] i386: Change the default Hyper-V version to match WS2016 Paolo Bonzini
2021-10-03  7:42 ` [PULL 23/30] configure: Loosen GCC requirement from 7.5.0 to 7.4.0 Paolo Bonzini
2021-10-03  7:42 ` [PULL 24/30] virtio-mem-pci: Fix memory leak when creating MEMORY_DEVICE_SIZE_CHANGE event Paolo Bonzini
2021-10-03  7:42 ` [PULL 25/30] qapi: Include qom-path in MEMORY_DEVICE_SIZE_CHANGE qapi events Paolo Bonzini
2021-10-03  7:42 ` [PULL 26/30] monitor: Rate-limit MEMORY_DEVICE_SIZE_CHANGE qapi events per device Paolo Bonzini
2021-10-03  7:42 ` [PULL 27/30] tpm: mark correct memory region range dirty when clearing RAM Paolo Bonzini
2021-10-03  7:42 ` [PULL 28/30] softmmu/memory_mapping: never merge ranges accross memory regions Paolo Bonzini
2021-10-03  7:42 ` [PULL 29/30] softmmu/memory_mapping: factor out adding physical memory ranges Paolo Bonzini
2021-10-03  7:42 ` [PULL 30/30] softmmu/memory_mapping: optimize for RamDiscardManager sections Paolo Bonzini
2021-10-03 14:44 ` [PULL 00/30] Misc changes for 2021-10-03 Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2021-10-03 15:12 ` Richard Henderson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20211003074250.60869-3-pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --to=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=berrange@redhat.com \
    --cc=cohuck@redhat.com \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=wangyanan55@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).