From: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: kwolf@redhat.com, vsementsov@virtuozzo.com, berrange@redhat.com,
libvir-list@redhat.com, eblake@redhat.com,
mdroth@linux.vnet.ibm.com, pkrempa@redhat.com,
marcandre.lureau@redhat.com, jsnow@redhat.com,
libguestfs@redhat.com
Subject: [PATCH v2 0/5] qapi: Add feature flags to enum members
Date: Sat, 9 Oct 2021 14:09:39 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20211009120944.2858887-1-armbru@redhat.com> (raw)
PATCH 1+2 add feature flags to enum members. Awkward due to an
introspection design mistake; see PATCH 1 for details.
PATCH 3+4 implement policy deprecated-input={reject,crash} for enum
values.
Policy deprecated-output=hide is not implemented, because we can't
hide a value without hiding the entire member, which is almost
certainly more than the requester of this policy bargained for.
Perhaps we want a new policy deprecated-output=hide-or-else-crash to
help us catch unwanted use of deprecated enum values. Perhaps we want
deprecated-output=hide to behave that way together with
deprecated-input=crash. Or even always. Thoughts?
PATCH 5 puts the new feature flags to use. It's RFC because it makes
sense only on top of Vladimir's deprecation of drive-backup. See its
commit message for a reference.
I prefer to commit new features together with a use outside tests/.
PATCH 5 adds such a use, but it's RFC, because it depends on
Vladimir's work. Perhaps another use pops up. I can delay this work
in the hope of a use becoming ready, but the feature flags work I have
in the pipeline will eventually force my hand.
v2:
* Rebased with straightforward conflicts.
* PATCH 1-4: No longer RFC.
* PATCH 1: "Since" information fixed [Eric]. Commit message updated
to reflect feedback.
* PATCH 2: Commit message amended to point out special feature flag
'deprecated' is ignored at this stage.
* PATCH 4: Documentation updated. Commit message tweaked.
Markus Armbruster (5):
qapi: Enable enum member introspection to show more than name
qapi: Add feature flags to enum members
qapi: Move compat policy from QObject to generic visitor
qapi: Implement deprecated-input={reject,crash} for enum values
block: Deprecate transaction type drive-backup
docs/devel/qapi-code-gen.rst | 10 ++++---
qapi/compat.json | 3 +++
qapi/introspect.json | 24 +++++++++++++++--
qapi/transaction.json | 5 +++-
include/qapi/qobject-input-visitor.h | 4 ---
include/qapi/qobject-output-visitor.h | 4 ---
include/qapi/util.h | 6 ++++-
include/qapi/visitor-impl.h | 3 +++
include/qapi/visitor.h | 9 +++++++
qapi/qapi-visit-core.c | 27 ++++++++++++++++---
qapi/qmp-dispatch.c | 4 +--
qapi/qobject-input-visitor.c | 14 +---------
qapi/qobject-output-visitor.c | 14 +---------
scripts/qapi/expr.py | 3 ++-
scripts/qapi/introspect.py | 19 ++++++++++---
scripts/qapi/schema.py | 22 +++++++++++++--
scripts/qapi/types.py | 17 +++++++++++-
tests/qapi-schema/doc-good.json | 5 +++-
tests/qapi-schema/doc-good.out | 3 +++
tests/qapi-schema/doc-good.txt | 3 +++
.../qapi-schema/enum-dict-member-unknown.err | 2 +-
tests/qapi-schema/qapi-schema-test.json | 3 ++-
tests/qapi-schema/qapi-schema-test.out | 1 +
tests/qapi-schema/test-qapi.py | 1 +
24 files changed, 149 insertions(+), 57 deletions(-)
--
2.31.1
next reply other threads:[~2021-10-09 12:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-10-09 12:09 Markus Armbruster [this message]
2021-10-09 12:09 ` [PATCH v2 1/5] qapi: Enable enum member introspection to show more than name Markus Armbruster
2021-10-11 18:37 ` Eric Blake
2021-10-12 10:08 ` Kevin Wolf
2021-10-21 7:45 ` Markus Armbruster
2021-10-09 12:09 ` [PATCH v2 2/5] qapi: Add feature flags to enum members Markus Armbruster
2021-10-12 10:41 ` Kevin Wolf
2021-10-21 8:48 ` Markus Armbruster
2021-10-09 12:09 ` [PATCH v2 3/5] qapi: Move compat policy from QObject to generic visitor Markus Armbruster
2021-10-09 12:09 ` [PATCH v2 4/5] qapi: Implement deprecated-input={reject, crash} for enum values Markus Armbruster
2021-10-11 18:53 ` [PATCH v2 4/5] qapi: Implement deprecated-input={reject,crash} " Eric Blake
2021-10-21 9:40 ` Markus Armbruster
2021-10-09 12:09 ` [PATCH RFC v2 5/5] block: Deprecate transaction type drive-backup Markus Armbruster
2021-10-11 18:58 ` Eric Blake
2021-10-12 10:52 ` Kevin Wolf
2021-10-21 9:47 ` Markus Armbruster
2021-10-12 12:39 ` [PATCH v2 0/5] qapi: Add feature flags to enum members Peter Krempa
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20211009120944.2858887-1-armbru@redhat.com \
--to=armbru@redhat.com \
--cc=berrange@redhat.com \
--cc=eblake@redhat.com \
--cc=jsnow@redhat.com \
--cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
--cc=libguestfs@redhat.com \
--cc=libvir-list@redhat.com \
--cc=marcandre.lureau@redhat.com \
--cc=mdroth@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=pkrempa@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=vsementsov@virtuozzo.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).