From: Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>
To: Gavin Shan <gshan@redhat.com>
Cc: robh@kernel.org, qemu-riscv@nongnu.org, ehabkost@redhat.com,
peter.maydell@linaro.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org,
qemu-arm@nongnu.org, shan.gavin@gmail.com, imammedo@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] hw/arm/virt: Don't create device-tree node for empty NUMA node
Date: Fri, 15 Oct 2021 14:22:26 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20211015122226.g42zu7hsbc2fey27@gator> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211015104909.16722-1-gshan@redhat.com>
On Fri, Oct 15, 2021 at 06:49:09PM +0800, Gavin Shan wrote:
> The empty NUMA node, where no memory resides, are allowed. For
> example, the following command line specifies two empty NUMA nodes.
> With this, QEMU fails to boot because of the conflicting device-tree
> node names, as the following error message indicates.
>
> /home/gavin/sandbox/qemu.main/build/qemu-system-aarch64 \
> -accel kvm -machine virt,gic-version=host \
> -cpu host -smp 4,sockets=2,cores=2,threads=1 \
> -m 1024M,slots=16,maxmem=64G \
> -object memory-backend-ram,id=mem0,size=512M \
> -object memory-backend-ram,id=mem1,size=512M \
> -numa node,nodeid=0,cpus=0-1,memdev=mem0 \
> -numa node,nodeid=1,cpus=2-3,memdev=mem1 \
> -numa node,nodeid=2 \
> -numa node,nodeid=3
> :
> qemu-system-aarch64: FDT: Failed to create subnode /memory@80000000: FDT_ERR_EXISTS
>
> As specified by linux device-tree binding document, the device-tree
> nodes for these empty NUMA nodes shouldn't be generated. However,
> the corresponding NUMA node IDs should be included in the distance
> map. As the memory hotplug through device-tree on ARM64 isn't existing
> so far, it's pointless to expose the empty NUMA nodes through device-tree.
Instead of "it's pointless to expose the empty NUMA nodes through
device-tree", how about
it's not necessary to require the user to provide a distance map.
Furthermore, the default distance map Linux generates may even be
sufficient.
> So this simply skips populating the device-tree nodes for these empty
> NUMA nodes to avoid the error, so that QEMU can be started successfully.
>
> Signed-off-by: Gavin Shan <gshan@redhat.com>
> ---
> v4: Drop patch to enforce distance-map as memory hotplug through
> device-tree is never supported on ARM64. It's pointless to
> expose these empty NUMA nodes. Besides, comments added to
> explain the code changes included in this patch as Drew
> suggested.
> ---
> hw/arm/boot.c | 14 ++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/hw/arm/boot.c b/hw/arm/boot.c
> index 57efb61ee4..e05c1c149c 100644
> --- a/hw/arm/boot.c
> +++ b/hw/arm/boot.c
> @@ -599,10 +599,24 @@ int arm_load_dtb(hwaddr addr, const struct arm_boot_info *binfo,
> }
> g_strfreev(node_path);
>
> + /*
> + * According to Linux NUMA binding document, the device tree nodes
> + * for the empty NUMA nodes shouldn't be generated, but their NUMA
> + * node IDs should be included in the distance map instead. However,
> + * it's pointless to expose the empty NUMA nodes as memory hotplug
> + * through device tree is never supported. We simply skip generating
> + * their device tree nodes to avoid the unexpected device tree
> + * generating failure due to the duplicated names of these empty
> + * NUMA nodes.
> + */
/*
* We drop all the memory nodes which correspond to empty NUMA nodes from
* the device tree, because the Linux NUMA binding document states they
* should not be generated. Linux will get the NUMA node IDs of the empty
* NUMA nodes from the distance map if they are needed. This means QEMU
* users may be obliged to provide command lines which configure distance
* maps when the empty NUMA node IDs are needed and Linux's default
* distance map isn't sufficient.
*/
> if (ms->numa_state != NULL && ms->numa_state->num_nodes > 0) {
> mem_base = binfo->loader_start;
> for (i = 0; i < ms->numa_state->num_nodes; i++) {
> mem_len = ms->numa_state->nodes[i].node_mem;
> + if (!mem_len) {
> + continue;
> + }
> +
> rc = fdt_add_memory_node(fdt, acells, mem_base,
> scells, mem_len, i);
> if (rc < 0) {
> --
> 2.23.0
>
Thanks,
drew
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-10-15 12:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-10-15 10:49 [PATCH v4] hw/arm/virt: Don't create device-tree node for empty NUMA node Gavin Shan
2021-10-15 12:22 ` Andrew Jones [this message]
2021-10-15 12:43 ` Gavin Shan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20211015122226.g42zu7hsbc2fey27@gator \
--to=drjones@redhat.com \
--cc=ehabkost@redhat.com \
--cc=gshan@redhat.com \
--cc=imammedo@redhat.com \
--cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
--cc=qemu-arm@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-riscv@nongnu.org \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=shan.gavin@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).