qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>
To: Gavin Shan <gshan@redhat.com>
Cc: robh@kernel.org, qemu-riscv@nongnu.org, ehabkost@redhat.com,
	peter.maydell@linaro.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org,
	qemu-arm@nongnu.org, shan.gavin@gmail.com, imammedo@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] hw/arm/virt: Don't create device-tree node for empty NUMA node
Date: Fri, 15 Oct 2021 14:22:26 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20211015122226.g42zu7hsbc2fey27@gator> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211015104909.16722-1-gshan@redhat.com>

On Fri, Oct 15, 2021 at 06:49:09PM +0800, Gavin Shan wrote:
> The empty NUMA node, where no memory resides, are allowed. For
> example, the following command line specifies two empty NUMA nodes.
> With this, QEMU fails to boot because of the conflicting device-tree
> node names, as the following error message indicates.
> 
>   /home/gavin/sandbox/qemu.main/build/qemu-system-aarch64 \
>   -accel kvm -machine virt,gic-version=host               \
>   -cpu host -smp 4,sockets=2,cores=2,threads=1            \
>   -m 1024M,slots=16,maxmem=64G                            \
>   -object memory-backend-ram,id=mem0,size=512M            \
>   -object memory-backend-ram,id=mem1,size=512M            \
>   -numa node,nodeid=0,cpus=0-1,memdev=mem0                \
>   -numa node,nodeid=1,cpus=2-3,memdev=mem1                \
>   -numa node,nodeid=2                                     \
>   -numa node,nodeid=3
>     :
>   qemu-system-aarch64: FDT: Failed to create subnode /memory@80000000: FDT_ERR_EXISTS
> 
> As specified by linux device-tree binding document, the device-tree
> nodes for these empty NUMA nodes shouldn't be generated. However,
> the corresponding NUMA node IDs should be included in the distance
> map. As the memory hotplug through device-tree on ARM64 isn't existing
> so far, it's pointless to expose the empty NUMA nodes through device-tree.

Instead of "it's pointless to expose the empty NUMA nodes through
device-tree", how about

 it's not necessary to require the user to provide a distance map.
 Furthermore, the default distance map Linux generates may even be
 sufficient.

> So this simply skips populating the device-tree nodes for these empty
> NUMA nodes to avoid the error, so that QEMU can be started successfully.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Gavin Shan <gshan@redhat.com>
> ---
> v4: Drop patch to enforce distance-map as memory hotplug through
>     device-tree is never supported on ARM64. It's pointless to
>     expose these empty NUMA nodes. Besides, comments added to
>     explain the code changes included in this patch as Drew
>     suggested.
> ---
>  hw/arm/boot.c | 14 ++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 14 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/hw/arm/boot.c b/hw/arm/boot.c
> index 57efb61ee4..e05c1c149c 100644
> --- a/hw/arm/boot.c
> +++ b/hw/arm/boot.c
> @@ -599,10 +599,24 @@ int arm_load_dtb(hwaddr addr, const struct arm_boot_info *binfo,
>      }
>      g_strfreev(node_path);
>  
> +    /*
> +     * According to Linux NUMA binding document, the device tree nodes
> +     * for the empty NUMA nodes shouldn't be generated, but their NUMA
> +     * node IDs should be included in the distance map instead. However,
> +     * it's pointless to expose the empty NUMA nodes as memory hotplug
> +     * through device tree is never supported. We simply skip generating
> +     * their device tree nodes to avoid the unexpected device tree
> +     * generating failure due to the duplicated names of these empty
> +     * NUMA nodes.
> +     */

    /*
     * We drop all the memory nodes which correspond to empty NUMA nodes from
     * the device tree, because the Linux NUMA binding document states they
     * should not be generated.  Linux will get the NUMA node IDs of the empty
     * NUMA nodes from the distance map if they are needed.  This means QEMU
     * users may be obliged to provide command lines which configure distance
     * maps when the empty NUMA node IDs are needed and Linux's default
     * distance map isn't sufficient.
     */



>      if (ms->numa_state != NULL && ms->numa_state->num_nodes > 0) {
>          mem_base = binfo->loader_start;
>          for (i = 0; i < ms->numa_state->num_nodes; i++) {
>              mem_len = ms->numa_state->nodes[i].node_mem;
> +            if (!mem_len) {
> +                continue;
> +            }
> +
>              rc = fdt_add_memory_node(fdt, acells, mem_base,
>                                       scells, mem_len, i);
>              if (rc < 0) {
> -- 
> 2.23.0
>

Thanks,
drew 



  reply	other threads:[~2021-10-15 12:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-10-15 10:49 [PATCH v4] hw/arm/virt: Don't create device-tree node for empty NUMA node Gavin Shan
2021-10-15 12:22 ` Andrew Jones [this message]
2021-10-15 12:43   ` Gavin Shan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20211015122226.g42zu7hsbc2fey27@gator \
    --to=drjones@redhat.com \
    --cc=ehabkost@redhat.com \
    --cc=gshan@redhat.com \
    --cc=imammedo@redhat.com \
    --cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
    --cc=qemu-arm@nongnu.org \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=qemu-riscv@nongnu.org \
    --cc=robh@kernel.org \
    --cc=shan.gavin@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).