From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6FFAC433F5 for ; Wed, 20 Oct 2021 15:19:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5063161359 for ; Wed, 20 Oct 2021 15:19:24 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 mail.kernel.org 5063161359 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=nongnu.org Received: from localhost ([::1]:54796 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mdDND-0001vK-Bt for qemu-devel@archiver.kernel.org; Wed, 20 Oct 2021 11:19:23 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:60848) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mdDLp-0007lP-US for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 20 Oct 2021 11:17:57 -0400 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com ([170.10.129.124]:50988) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mdDLo-0001WS-Dj for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 20 Oct 2021 11:17:57 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1634743075; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=LF+oqdbhhv44LY9JasX2H465wzrRGDRDwrw3Hf8U89c=; b=ZelD/iFe2nfabg0Y8t9q7y0oybIHR6odSWtxa7cY5qboSkruATPQTJqiBQINtTENEQNa1A 7gX3MPQ3TSm0aLtDGrQqsxEssjh8gdQshVBRyRK+Kxojr3YJNGmqt4KT/Kun9iCVqDNDMk r5BDDpzq1n+8c7uj6ungcE+htwuFiVs= Received: from mail-wm1-f69.google.com (mail-wm1-f69.google.com [209.85.128.69]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-7-HH4dh2iONzSYi1bEnG7Hpw-1; Wed, 20 Oct 2021 11:17:54 -0400 X-MC-Unique: HH4dh2iONzSYi1bEnG7Hpw-1 Received: by mail-wm1-f69.google.com with SMTP id o22-20020a1c7516000000b0030d6f9c7f5fso4408308wmc.1 for ; Wed, 20 Oct 2021 08:17:54 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=LF+oqdbhhv44LY9JasX2H465wzrRGDRDwrw3Hf8U89c=; b=jT9gBqMWPAVKOwvmksU1JWYL50JDjMYHhaVqGsODXu/MzXNTKsjpF6wJdfWvSR4PgJ /ZCCJox0drnoEvTdWOtlyXaeTKI4VGczdPpXwWkxEsHD8tCp43H6tzKFwb73rRTDGFsV c1RuZmyG85KfxI70xCbvDX6qENj/m5alsMOJxEE5lXIWI169yyS4OnFhZug29Ya8U7eT phXrSl5noGEiE5fZzPzZJ3pKTWv1tXOi70r14qgt43sIQVC7/c+VFyX5WBZkv8N/Y/co VD/OWZMTlMxfPPmivf0ZArOa6gx9oq7UOX6an511ovoxsdX7VdzAiyhqGEk4/4Wup1k+ Y4Ag== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530ztQiHjQ4c3X2FoYaQSI4zukDCmgCKDgCqdRroqzLiWCsIjI1l DxqDf3a9ayKgd2USJ+hFjAQbHrLigxcbk2myZcgKlwS9Bxarw+2sl4ldOFD9XboNQ0O+iZJnRsN 4RvYCf/KpGpPbkRI= X-Received: by 2002:a5d:698a:: with SMTP id g10mr469407wru.14.1634743073287; Wed, 20 Oct 2021 08:17:53 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxGykUofcfMHvv68qt/IwRnPg0FN1/zJcfATXazKWQmpL7jMOmgsDpg08ufBqLxTYOXunoWdQ== X-Received: by 2002:a5d:698a:: with SMTP id g10mr469360wru.14.1634743073004; Wed, 20 Oct 2021 08:17:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from redhat.com ([2.55.24.172]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id q17sm2286951wrm.6.2021.10.20.08.17.50 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 20 Oct 2021 08:17:52 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2021 11:17:48 -0400 From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" To: Jean-Philippe Brucker Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 00/11] virtio-iommu: Add ACPI support Message-ID: <20211020111729-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> References: <20211001173358.863017-1-jean-philippe@linaro.org> <20211005113719-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> <20211018112402-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Authentication-Results: relay.mimecast.com; auth=pass smtp.auth=CUSA124A263 smtp.mailfrom=mst@redhat.com X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Received-SPF: pass client-ip=170.10.129.124; envelope-from=mst@redhat.com; helo=us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com X-Spam_score_int: -8 X-Spam_score: -0.9 X-Spam_bar: / X-Spam_report: (-0.9 / 5.0 requ) DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: peter.maydell@linaro.org, ehabkost@redhat.com, shannon.zhaosl@gmail.com, richard.henderson@linaro.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, eric.auger@redhat.com, qemu-arm@nongnu.org, imammedo@redhat.com, ani@anisinha.ca, pbonzini@redhat.com Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" On Tue, Oct 19, 2021 at 04:39:20PM +0100, Jean-Philippe Brucker wrote: > On Mon, Oct 18, 2021 at 11:25:05AM -0400, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > On Fri, Oct 08, 2021 at 04:17:37PM +0100, Jean-Philippe Brucker wrote: > > > On Tue, Oct 05, 2021 at 11:45:42AM -0400, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > > > Looks like this can not be applied yet because the bypass bit > > > > isn't in yet. what's up with that? > > > > > > The boot-bypass bit isn't a hard dependency for this series, but it will > > > be needed for full support eventually. It will be delayed by spec and > > > Linux header changes > > > > > > In the meantime we can work around the problem by having the boot disks > > > bypass the IOMMU (virtio without iommu-platform, or iommu-bypass bus). > > > > > > Thanks, > > > Jean > > > > OK... how do we want to apply all this? > > If my tree I either need ack from an ARM maintainers, or > > post a partial patchset with just x86 bits. > > Either works for me, with preference for keeping a single series > (otherwise I need to split patch 8, or add the tests later). I'll send v5 > whole. > > Thanks, > Jean Then you will need an ack from arm maintainers. -- MST