From: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
To: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Cc: kwolf@redhat.com, pkrempa@redhat.com, berrange@redhat.com,
ehabkost@redhat.com, qemu-block@nongnu.org, quintela@redhat.com,
libvir-list@redhat.com, philmd@redhat.com, kchamart@redhat.com,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org, mdroth@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
dgilbert@redhat.com, pbonzini@redhat.com,
marcandre.lureau@redhat.com, jsnow@redhat.com,
libguestfs@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 5/9] qapi: Generalize struct member policy checking
Date: Fri, 29 Oct 2021 10:20:24 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20211029152024.7x2tiizzswurimdf@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211028102520.747396-6-armbru@redhat.com>
On Thu, Oct 28, 2021 at 12:25:16PM +0200, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> The generated visitor functions call visit_deprecated_accept() and
> visit_deprecated() when visiting a struct member with special feature
> flag 'deprecated'. This makes the feature flag visible to the actual
> visitors. I want to make feature flag 'unstable' visible there as
> well, so I can add policy for it.
>
> To let me make it visible, replace these functions by
> visit_policy_reject() and visit_policy_skip(), which take the member's
> special features as an argument. Note that the new functions have the
> opposite sense, i.e. the return value flips.
>
> Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
> ---
> +++ b/qapi/qapi-forward-visitor.c
> @@ -246,25 +246,27 @@ static void forward_field_optional(Visitor *v, const char *name, bool *present)
> visit_optional(ffv->target, name, present);
> }
>
> -static bool forward_field_deprecated_accept(Visitor *v, const char *name,
> - Error **errp)
> +static bool forward_field_policy_reject(Visitor *v, const char *name,
> + unsigned special_features,
> + Error **errp)
> {
> ForwardFieldVisitor *ffv = to_ffv(v);
>
> if (!forward_field_translate_name(ffv, &name, errp)) {
> return false;
Should this return value be flipped?
> }
> - return visit_deprecated_accept(ffv->target, name, errp);
> + return visit_policy_reject(ffv->target, name, special_features, errp);
> }
>
> -static bool forward_field_deprecated(Visitor *v, const char *name)
> +static bool forward_field_policy_skip(Visitor *v, const char *name,
> + unsigned special_features)
> {
> ForwardFieldVisitor *ffv = to_ffv(v);
>
> if (!forward_field_translate_name(ffv, &name, NULL)) {
> return false;
and here too?
> }
> - return visit_deprecated(ffv->target, name);
> + return visit_policy_skip(ffv->target, name, special_features);
> }
>
Otherwise, the rest of the logic changes for flipped sense look right.
--
Eric Blake, Principal Software Engineer
Red Hat, Inc. +1-919-301-3266
Virtualization: qemu.org | libvirt.org
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-10-29 15:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-10-28 10:25 [PATCH v2 0/9] Configurable policy for handling unstable interfaces Markus Armbruster
2021-10-28 10:25 ` [PATCH v2 1/9] qapi: New special feature flag "unstable" Markus Armbruster
2021-10-28 10:25 ` [PATCH v2 2/9] qapi: Mark unstable QMP parts with feature 'unstable' Markus Armbruster
2021-10-28 10:25 ` [PATCH v2 3/9] qapi: Eliminate QCO_NO_OPTIONS for a slight simplification Markus Armbruster
2021-10-28 10:25 ` [PATCH v2 4/9] qapi: Tools for sets of special feature flags in generated code Markus Armbruster
2021-10-29 10:32 ` Juan Quintela
2021-10-29 11:33 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2021-10-28 10:25 ` [PATCH v2 5/9] qapi: Generalize struct member policy checking Markus Armbruster
2021-10-29 10:42 ` Juan Quintela
2021-10-29 13:22 ` Markus Armbruster
2021-10-29 13:31 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2021-10-29 14:01 ` Markus Armbruster
2021-10-29 16:11 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2021-10-29 15:20 ` Eric Blake [this message]
2021-10-29 15:34 ` Markus Armbruster
2021-10-29 16:13 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2021-10-28 10:25 ` [PATCH v2 6/9] qapi: Generalize command " Markus Armbruster
2021-10-29 10:44 ` Juan Quintela
2021-10-29 15:28 ` Eric Blake
2021-10-29 16:11 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2021-10-28 10:25 ` [PATCH v2 7/9] qapi: Generalize enum member " Markus Armbruster
2021-10-29 11:31 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2021-10-28 10:25 ` [PATCH v2 8/9] qapi: Factor out compat_policy_input_ok() Markus Armbruster
2021-10-29 16:55 ` Markus Armbruster
2021-10-29 17:01 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2021-10-28 10:25 ` [PATCH v2 9/9] qapi: Extend -compat to set policy for unstable interfaces Markus Armbruster
2021-10-29 15:10 ` Eric Blake
2021-10-29 15:15 ` Markus Armbruster
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20211029152024.7x2tiizzswurimdf@redhat.com \
--to=eblake@redhat.com \
--cc=armbru@redhat.com \
--cc=berrange@redhat.com \
--cc=dgilbert@redhat.com \
--cc=ehabkost@redhat.com \
--cc=jsnow@redhat.com \
--cc=kchamart@redhat.com \
--cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
--cc=libguestfs@redhat.com \
--cc=libvir-list@redhat.com \
--cc=marcandre.lureau@redhat.com \
--cc=mdroth@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=philmd@redhat.com \
--cc=pkrempa@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-block@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=quintela@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).