From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
To: Stefan Berger <stefanb@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Ani Sinha <ani@anisinha.ca>,
marcandre.lureau@redhat.com, Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Shannon Zhao <shannon.zhaosl@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] acpi: tpm: Add missing device identification objects
Date: Tue, 9 Nov 2021 09:20:39 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20211109091432-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211109140152.3310657-3-stefanb@linux.ibm.com>
On Tue, Nov 09, 2021 at 09:01:51AM -0500, Stefan Berger wrote:
> Add missing device identification objects _STR and _UID. They will appear
> as files 'description' and 'uid' under Linux sysfs.
>
> Cc: Shannon Zhao <shannon.zhaosl@gmail.com>
> Cc: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
> Cc: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>
> Cc: Ani Sinha <ani@anisinha.ca>
> Fixes: https://gitlab.com/qemu-project/qemu/-/issues/708
> Signed-off-by: Stefan Berger <stefanb@linux.ibm.com>
Do you want this in 6.2?
> ---
> hw/arm/virt-acpi-build.c | 1 +
> hw/i386/acpi-build.c | 8 ++++++++
> 2 files changed, 9 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/hw/arm/virt-acpi-build.c b/hw/arm/virt-acpi-build.c
> index 674f902652..09456424aa 100644
> --- a/hw/arm/virt-acpi-build.c
> +++ b/hw/arm/virt-acpi-build.c
> @@ -228,6 +228,7 @@ static void acpi_dsdt_add_tpm(Aml *scope, VirtMachineState *vms)
>
> Aml *dev = aml_device("TPM0");
> aml_append(dev, aml_name_decl("_HID", aml_string("MSFT0101")));
> + aml_append(dev, aml_name_decl("_STR", aml_string("TPM 2.0 Device")));
> aml_append(dev, aml_name_decl("_UID", aml_int(0)));
>
> Aml *crs = aml_resource_template();
> diff --git a/hw/i386/acpi-build.c b/hw/i386/acpi-build.c
> index a3ad6abd33..5bd2160a89 100644
> --- a/hw/i386/acpi-build.c
> +++ b/hw/i386/acpi-build.c
> @@ -1808,11 +1808,15 @@ build_dsdt(GArray *table_data, BIOSLinker *linker,
> dev = aml_device("TPM");
> aml_append(dev, aml_name_decl("_HID",
> aml_string("MSFT0101")));
> + aml_append(dev,
> + aml_name_decl("_STR",
> + aml_string("TPM 2.0 Device")));
When we support more versions, won't this make us
do annoying tricks to say so in the string?
Why not just "TPM device" to future-proof it?
> } else {
> dev = aml_device("ISA.TPM");
> aml_append(dev, aml_name_decl("_HID",
> aml_eisaid("PNP0C31")));
> }
> + aml_append(dev, aml_name_decl("_UID", aml_int(1)));
>
The ACPI spec mentions also matching on _CID.
> aml_append(dev, aml_name_decl("_STA", aml_int(0xF)));
> crs = aml_resource_template();
> @@ -1840,6 +1844,8 @@ build_dsdt(GArray *table_data, BIOSLinker *linker,
> if (TPM_IS_CRB(tpm)) {
> dev = aml_device("TPM");
> aml_append(dev, aml_name_decl("_HID", aml_string("MSFT0101")));
> + aml_append(dev, aml_name_decl("_STR",
> + aml_string("TPM 2.0 Device")));
> crs = aml_resource_template();
> aml_append(crs, aml_memory32_fixed(TPM_CRB_ADDR_BASE,
> TPM_CRB_ADDR_SIZE, AML_READ_WRITE));
> @@ -1847,6 +1853,8 @@ build_dsdt(GArray *table_data, BIOSLinker *linker,
>
> aml_append(dev, aml_name_decl("_STA", aml_int(0xf)));
>
> + aml_append(dev, aml_name_decl("_UID", aml_int(1)));
> +
> tpm_build_ppi_acpi(tpm, dev);
>
> aml_append(sb_scope, dev);
> --
> 2.31.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-11-09 14:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-11-09 14:01 [PATCH v2 0/3] tpm: Add missing ACPI device identification objects Stefan Berger
2021-11-09 14:01 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] tests: acpi: prepare for updated TPM related tables Stefan Berger
2021-11-09 14:11 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2021-11-09 14:30 ` Stefan Berger
2021-11-10 12:15 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2021-11-09 14:01 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] acpi: tpm: Add missing device identification objects Stefan Berger
2021-11-09 14:20 ` Michael S. Tsirkin [this message]
2021-11-09 14:26 ` Stefan Berger
2021-11-10 12:17 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2021-11-09 14:01 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] tests: acpi: Add updated TPM related tables Stefan Berger
2021-11-09 14:14 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2021-11-09 14:29 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2021-11-09 14:56 ` Ani Sinha
2021-11-09 15:05 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2021-11-09 16:14 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2021-11-09 16:05 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2021-11-09 16:16 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2021-11-09 16:49 ` Ani Sinha
2021-11-09 16:50 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20211109091432-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org \
--to=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=ani@anisinha.ca \
--cc=imammedo@redhat.com \
--cc=marcandre.lureau@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=shannon.zhaosl@gmail.com \
--cc=stefanb@linux.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).