qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Halil Pasic <pasic@linux.ibm.com>
To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
	Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>,
	 Halil Pasic <pasic@linux.ibm.com>,
	qemu-s390x@nongnu.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>,
	Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>,
	Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>,
	David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Subject: [RFC PATCH v2 1/5] virtio: introduce virtio_force_modern()
Date: Fri, 12 Nov 2021 15:57:45 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20211112145749.618157-2-pasic@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211112145749.618157-1-pasic@linux.ibm.com>

Legacy vs modern should be detected via transport specific means. We
can't wait till feature negotiation is done. Let us introduce
virtio_force_modern() as a means for the transport code to signal
that the device should operate in modern mode (because a modern driver
was detected).

A new callback is added for the situations where the device needs
to do more than just setting the VIRTIO_F_VERSION_1 feature bit. For
example, when vhost is involved, we may need to propagate the features
to the vhost device.

Signed-off-by: Halil Pasic <pasic@linux.ibm.com>
---

I'm still struggling with how to deal with vhost-user and co. The
problem is that I'm not very familiar with the life-cycle of, let us
say, a vhost_user device.

Looks to me like the vhost part might be just an implementation detail,
and could even become a hot swappable thing.

Another thing is, that vhost processes set_features differently. It
might or might not be a good idea to change this.

Does anybody know why don't we propagate the features on features_set,
but under a set of different conditions, one of which is the vhost
device is started?
---
 hw/virtio/virtio.c         | 13 +++++++++++++
 include/hw/virtio/virtio.h |  2 ++
 2 files changed, 15 insertions(+)

diff --git a/hw/virtio/virtio.c b/hw/virtio/virtio.c
index 3a1f6c520c..26db1b31e6 100644
--- a/hw/virtio/virtio.c
+++ b/hw/virtio/virtio.c
@@ -3281,6 +3281,19 @@ void virtio_init(VirtIODevice *vdev, const char *name,
     vdev->use_guest_notifier_mask = true;
 }
 
+void  virtio_force_modern(VirtIODevice *vdev)
+{
+    VirtioDeviceClass *k = VIRTIO_DEVICE_GET_CLASS(vdev);
+
+    virtio_add_feature(&vdev->guest_features, VIRTIO_F_VERSION_1);
+    /* Let the device do it's normal thing. */
+    virtio_set_features(vdev, vdev->guest_features);
+    /* For example for vhost-user we have to propagate to the vhost dev. */
+    if (k->force_modern) {
+        k->force_modern(vdev);
+    }
+}
+
 /*
  * Only devices that have already been around prior to defining the virtio
  * standard support legacy mode; this includes devices not specified in the
diff --git a/include/hw/virtio/virtio.h b/include/hw/virtio/virtio.h
index 8bab9cfb75..1bb1551865 100644
--- a/include/hw/virtio/virtio.h
+++ b/include/hw/virtio/virtio.h
@@ -126,6 +126,7 @@ struct VirtioDeviceClass {
     int (*validate_features)(VirtIODevice *vdev);
     void (*get_config)(VirtIODevice *vdev, uint8_t *config);
     void (*set_config)(VirtIODevice *vdev, const uint8_t *config);
+    void (*force_modern)(VirtIODevice *vdev);
     void (*reset)(VirtIODevice *vdev);
     void (*set_status)(VirtIODevice *vdev, uint8_t val);
     /* For transitional devices, this is a bitmap of features
@@ -394,6 +395,7 @@ static inline bool virtio_device_disabled(VirtIODevice *vdev)
     return unlikely(vdev->disabled || vdev->broken);
 }
 
+void  virtio_force_modern(VirtIODevice *vdev);
 bool virtio_legacy_allowed(VirtIODevice *vdev);
 bool virtio_legacy_check_disabled(VirtIODevice *vdev);
 
-- 
2.25.1



  reply	other threads:[~2021-11-12 15:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-11-12 14:57 [RFC PATCH v2 0/5] virtio: early detect 'modern' virtio Halil Pasic
2021-11-12 14:57 ` Halil Pasic [this message]
2021-11-12 15:37   ` [RFC PATCH v2 1/5] virtio: introduce virtio_force_modern() Cornelia Huck
2021-11-15 13:26     ` Halil Pasic
2021-11-15 16:57       ` Cornelia Huck
2021-11-16 14:44         ` Halil Pasic
2021-11-12 14:57 ` [RFC PATCH v2 2/5] virtio-ccw: use virtio_force_modern() Halil Pasic
2021-11-12 14:57 ` [RFC PATCH v2 3/5] virtio-pci: " Halil Pasic
2021-11-12 14:57 ` [RFC PATCH v2 4/5] vhost: push features to backend on force_modern Halil Pasic
2021-11-12 14:57 ` [RFC PATCH v2 5/5] virtio-net: handle force_modern for vhost Halil Pasic
2021-11-23 13:13 ` [RFC PATCH v2 0/5] virtio: early detect 'modern' virtio Halil Pasic
2021-11-29 11:59   ` Halil Pasic
2021-12-08 18:56 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2021-12-09 13:29   ` Halil Pasic
2021-12-09 17:54     ` Michael S. Tsirkin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20211112145749.618157-2-pasic@linux.ibm.com \
    --to=pasic@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=cohuck@redhat.com \
    --cc=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=mst@redhat.com \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=qemu-s390x@nongnu.org \
    --cc=richard.henderson@linaro.org \
    --cc=thuth@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).