qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
To: qemu-block@nongnu.org
Cc: "Kevin Wolf" <kwolf@redhat.com>, "Fam Zheng" <fam@euphon.net>,
	"Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy" <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>,
	"Daniel P. Berrangé" <berrange@redhat.com>,
	"Eduardo Habkost" <ehabkost@redhat.com>,
	"Juan Quintela" <quintela@redhat.com>,
	qemu-devel@nongnu.org, "John Snow" <jsnow@redhat.com>,
	"Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito" <eesposit@redhat.com>,
	"Richard Henderson" <richard.henderson@linaro.org>,
	"Markus Armbruster" <armbru@redhat.com>,
	"Dr. David Alan Gilbert" <dgilbert@redhat.com>,
	"Hanna Reitz" <hreitz@redhat.com>,
	"Stefan Hajnoczi" <stefanha@redhat.com>,
	"Paolo Bonzini" <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	"Eric Blake" <eblake@redhat.com>
Subject: [PATCH v5 31/31] block.c: assertions to the block layer permissions API
Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2021 01:44:18 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20211124064418.3120601-32-eesposit@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211124064418.3120601-1-eesposit@redhat.com>

Now that we "covered" the three main cases where the
permission API was being used under BQL (fuse,
amend and invalidate_cache), we can safely assert for
the permission functions implemented in block.c

Signed-off-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
---
 block.c | 12 ++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+)

diff --git a/block.c b/block.c
index 805974676b..6056ec4bc5 100644
--- a/block.c
+++ b/block.c
@@ -2138,6 +2138,7 @@ static bool bdrv_a_allow_b(BdrvChild *a, BdrvChild *b, Error **errp)
 
     assert(a->bs);
     assert(a->bs == b->bs);
+    assert(qemu_in_main_thread());
 
     if ((b->perm & a->shared_perm) == b->perm) {
         return true;
@@ -2161,6 +2162,7 @@ static bool bdrv_a_allow_b(BdrvChild *a, BdrvChild *b, Error **errp)
 static bool bdrv_parent_perms_conflict(BlockDriverState *bs, Error **errp)
 {
     BdrvChild *a, *b;
+    assert(qemu_in_main_thread());
 
     /*
      * During the loop we'll look at each pair twice. That's correct because
@@ -2245,6 +2247,8 @@ static void bdrv_child_set_perm_abort(void *opaque)
 {
     BdrvChildSetPermState *s = opaque;
 
+    assert(qemu_in_main_thread());
+
     s->child->perm = s->old_perm;
     s->child->shared_perm = s->old_shared_perm;
 }
@@ -2258,6 +2262,7 @@ static void bdrv_child_set_perm(BdrvChild *c, uint64_t perm,
                                 uint64_t shared, Transaction *tran)
 {
     BdrvChildSetPermState *s = g_new(BdrvChildSetPermState, 1);
+    assert(qemu_in_main_thread());
 
     *s = (BdrvChildSetPermState) {
         .child = c,
@@ -2442,6 +2447,7 @@ static int bdrv_node_refresh_perm(BlockDriverState *bs, BlockReopenQueue *q,
     BdrvChild *c;
     int ret;
     uint64_t cumulative_perms, cumulative_shared_perms;
+    assert(qemu_in_main_thread());
 
     bdrv_get_cumulative_perm(bs, &cumulative_perms, &cumulative_shared_perms);
 
@@ -2510,6 +2516,7 @@ static int bdrv_list_refresh_perms(GSList *list, BlockReopenQueue *q,
 {
     int ret;
     BlockDriverState *bs;
+    assert(qemu_in_main_thread());
 
     for ( ; list; list = list->next) {
         bs = list->data;
@@ -2582,6 +2589,7 @@ static int bdrv_refresh_perms(BlockDriverState *bs, Error **errp)
     int ret;
     Transaction *tran = tran_new();
     g_autoptr(GSList) list = bdrv_topological_dfs(NULL, NULL, bs);
+    assert(qemu_in_main_thread());
 
     ret = bdrv_list_refresh_perms(list, NULL, tran, errp);
     tran_finalize(tran, ret);
@@ -2648,6 +2656,7 @@ static void bdrv_filter_default_perms(BlockDriverState *bs, BdrvChild *c,
                                       uint64_t perm, uint64_t shared,
                                       uint64_t *nperm, uint64_t *nshared)
 {
+    assert(qemu_in_main_thread());
     *nperm = perm & DEFAULT_PERM_PASSTHROUGH;
     *nshared = (shared & DEFAULT_PERM_PASSTHROUGH) | DEFAULT_PERM_UNCHANGED;
 }
@@ -2659,6 +2668,7 @@ static void bdrv_default_perms_for_cow(BlockDriverState *bs, BdrvChild *c,
                                        uint64_t *nperm, uint64_t *nshared)
 {
     assert(role & BDRV_CHILD_COW);
+    assert(qemu_in_main_thread());
 
     /*
      * We want consistent read from backing files if the parent needs it.
@@ -2696,6 +2706,7 @@ static void bdrv_default_perms_for_storage(BlockDriverState *bs, BdrvChild *c,
 {
     int flags;
 
+    assert(qemu_in_main_thread());
     assert(role & (BDRV_CHILD_METADATA | BDRV_CHILD_DATA));
 
     flags = bdrv_reopen_get_flags(reopen_queue, bs);
@@ -6094,6 +6105,7 @@ static void xdbg_graph_add_edge(XDbgBlockGraphConstructor *gr, void *parent,
 {
     BlockPermission qapi_perm;
     XDbgBlockGraphEdge *edge;
+    assert(qemu_in_main_thread());
 
     edge = g_new0(XDbgBlockGraphEdge, 1);
 
-- 
2.27.0



  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-11-24  7:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 66+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-11-24  6:43 [PATCH v5 00/31] block layer: split block APIs in global state and I/O Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito
2021-11-24  6:43 ` [PATCH v5 01/31] main-loop.h: introduce qemu_in_main_thread() Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito
2021-11-24  6:43 ` [PATCH v5 02/31] include/block/block: split header into I/O and global state API Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito
2021-11-24  6:43 ` [PATCH v5 03/31] assertions for block " Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito
2021-12-16 15:17   ` Hanna Reitz
2021-11-24  6:43 ` [PATCH v5 04/31] include/sysemu/block-backend: split header into I/O and global state (GS) API Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito
2021-12-10 14:21   ` Hanna Reitz
2021-11-24  6:43 ` [PATCH v5 05/31] block-backend: special comments for blk_set/get_perm due to fuse Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito
2021-12-10 14:38   ` Hanna Reitz
2021-12-15  8:57     ` Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito
2021-12-15 10:13       ` Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito
2021-12-16 14:00         ` Hanna Reitz
2021-11-24  6:43 ` [PATCH v5 06/31] block/block-backend.c: assertions for block-backend Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito
2021-12-10 15:37   ` Hanna Reitz
2021-11-24  6:43 ` [PATCH v5 07/31] include/block/block_int: split header into I/O and global state API Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito
2021-11-24  6:43 ` [PATCH v5 08/31] assertions for block_int " Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito
2021-11-24  6:43 ` [PATCH v5 09/31] block: introduce assert_bdrv_graph_writable Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito
2021-12-10 17:43   ` Hanna Reitz
2021-12-14 19:48     ` Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito
2021-12-16 14:01       ` Hanna Reitz
2021-11-24  6:43 ` [PATCH v5 10/31] block.c: modify .attach and .detach callbacks of child_of_bds Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito
2021-12-16 14:57   ` Hanna Reitz
2021-12-16 16:05     ` Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito
2021-12-16 16:12       ` Hanna Reitz
2021-11-24  6:43 ` [PATCH v5 11/31] include/block/blockjob_int.h: split header into I/O and GS API Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito
2021-11-24  6:43 ` [PATCH v5 12/31] assertions for blockjob_int.h Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito
2021-11-24  6:44 ` [PATCH v5 13/31] block.c: add assertions to static functions Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito
2021-12-16 16:08   ` Hanna Reitz
2021-12-16 16:39     ` Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito
2021-11-24  6:44 ` [PATCH v5 14/31] include/block/blockjob.h: global state API Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito
2021-11-24  6:44 ` [PATCH v5 15/31] assertions for blockjob.h " Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito
2021-11-24  6:44 ` [PATCH v5 16/31] include/sysemu/blockdev.h: " Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito
2021-11-24  6:44 ` [PATCH v5 17/31] assertions for blockdev.h " Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito
2021-11-24  6:44 ` [PATCH v5 18/31] include/block/snapshot: global state API + assertions Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito
2021-11-24  6:44 ` [PATCH v5 19/31] block/copy-before-write.h: " Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito
2021-11-24  6:44 ` [PATCH v5 20/31] block/coroutines: I/O API Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito
2021-11-24  6:44 ` [PATCH v5 21/31] block_int-common.h: split function pointers in BlockDriver Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito
2021-11-24  6:44 ` [PATCH v5 22/31] block_int-common.h: assertion in the callers of BlockDriver function pointers Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito
2021-12-16 18:43   ` Hanna Reitz
2021-12-17 15:53     ` Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito
2021-12-17 16:00       ` Hanna Reitz
2021-11-24  6:44 ` [PATCH v5 23/31] block_int-common.h: split function pointers in BdrvChildClass Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito
2021-11-24  6:44 ` [PATCH v5 24/31] block_int-common.h: assertions in the callers of BdrvChildClass function pointers Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito
2021-11-24  6:44 ` [PATCH v5 25/31] block-backend-common.h: split function pointers in BlockDevOps Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito
2021-11-24  6:44 ` [PATCH v5 26/31] job.h: split function pointers in JobDriver Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito
2021-11-24  6:44 ` [PATCH v5 27/31] job.h: assertions in the callers of JobDriver funcion pointers Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito
2021-11-24  6:44 ` [PATCH v5 28/31] block.c: assert BQL lock held in bdrv_co_invalidate_cache Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito
2021-12-17 11:04   ` Hanna Reitz
2021-12-17 16:38     ` Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito
2021-12-20 12:20       ` Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito
2021-12-23 17:11         ` Hanna Reitz
2022-01-19 15:57           ` Hanna Reitz
2022-01-19 17:44             ` Hanna Reitz
2022-01-19 18:34         ` Kevin Wolf
2022-01-20 13:22           ` Paolo Bonzini
2022-01-20 13:48             ` Kevin Wolf
2022-01-21 10:22               ` Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito
2021-11-24  6:44 ` [PATCH v5 29/31] jobs: introduce pre_run function in JobDriver Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito
2021-11-24  6:44 ` [PATCH v5 30/31] crypto: delegate permission functions to JobDriver .pre_run Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito
2021-12-17 12:29   ` Hanna Reitz
2021-12-17 14:32     ` Hanna Reitz
2021-12-20 15:47     ` Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito
2021-12-23 17:15       ` Hanna Reitz
2021-11-24  6:44 ` Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito [this message]
2021-11-29 13:32 ` [PATCH v5 00/31] block layer: split block APIs in global state and I/O Stefan Hajnoczi
2021-11-30  8:39   ` Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20211124064418.3120601-32-eesposit@redhat.com \
    --to=eesposit@redhat.com \
    --cc=armbru@redhat.com \
    --cc=berrange@redhat.com \
    --cc=dgilbert@redhat.com \
    --cc=eblake@redhat.com \
    --cc=ehabkost@redhat.com \
    --cc=fam@euphon.net \
    --cc=hreitz@redhat.com \
    --cc=jsnow@redhat.com \
    --cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=qemu-block@nongnu.org \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=quintela@redhat.com \
    --cc=richard.henderson@linaro.org \
    --cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
    --cc=vsementsov@virtuozzo.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).