qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Halil Pasic <pasic@linux.ibm.com>
To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Cc: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>, Halil Pasic <pasic@linux.ibm.com>,
	qemu-stable@nongnu.org, Jakob Naucke <Jakob.Naucke@ibm.com>,
	qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] virtio: fix the condition for iommu_platform not supported
Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2022 20:54:52 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220113205452.4443ee4e.pasic@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220113115617-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org>

On Thu, 13 Jan 2022 12:11:42 -0500
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com> wrote:

> On Thu, Jan 13, 2022 at 05:51:31PM +0100, Halil Pasic wrote:
> > The commit 04ceb61a40 ("virtio: Fail if iommu_platform is requested, but
> > unsupported") claims to fail the device hotplug when iommu_platform
> > is requested, but not supported by the (vhost) device. On the first
> > glance the condition for detecting that situation looks perfect, but
> > because a certain peculiarity of virtio_platform it ain't.
> > 
> > In fact the aforementioned commit introduces a regression. It breaks
> > virtio-fs support for Secure Execution, and most likely also for AMD SEV
> > or any other confidential guest scenario that relies encrypted guest
> > memory.  The same also applies to any other vhost device that does not
> > negotiate _F_ACCESS_PLATFORM.
> > 
> > The peculiarity is that iommu_platform and _F_ACCESS_PLATFORM collates
> > "device can not access all of the guest ram" and "iova != gpa, thus
> > device needs to translate iova".
> > 
> > Confidential guest technologies currently rely on the device/hypervisor
> > offering _F_ACCESS_PLATFORM to grant access to whatever the device needs
> > to see, because of the first. But, generally, they don't care for the
> > second.
> > 
> > This is the very reason for which commit 7ef7e6e3b ("vhost: correctly
> > turn on VIRTIO_F_IOMMU_PLATFORM") for, which fences _F_ACCESS_PLATFORM
> > form the vhost device that does not need it, because on the vhost
> > interface it only means "I/O address translation is needed".
> > 
> > This patch takes inspiration from 7ef7e6e3b ("vhost: correctly turn on
> > VIRTIO_F_IOMMU_PLATFORM"),  
> 
> Strange, I could not find this commit. Did you mean f7ef7e6e3b?
> 

Right! Copy-paste error.


 
 static void *vhost_memory_map(struct vhost_dev *dev, hwaddr addr,
@@ -765,6 +772,9 @@ static int vhost_dev_set_features(struct vhost_dev *dev,
     if (enable_log) {
         features |= 0x1ULL << VHOST_F_LOG_ALL;
     }
+    if (!vhost_dev_has_iommu(dev)) {
+        features &= ~(0x1ULL << VIRTIO_F_IOMMU_PLATFORM);
+    }
     r = dev->vhost_ops->vhost_set_features(dev, features);
     if (r < 0) {
         VHOST_OPS_DEBUG("vhost_set_features failed");

> > and uses the same condition for detecting the
> > situation when _F_ACCESS_PLATFORM is requested, but no I/O translation
> > by the device, and thus no device capability is needed.
> >
> > In this
> > situation claiming that the device does not support iommu_plattform=on
> > is counter-productive. So let us stop doing that!
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Halil Pasic <pasic@linux.ibm.com>
> > Reported-by: Jakob Naucke <Jakob.Naucke@ibm.com>
> > Fixes: 04ceb61a40 ("virtio: Fail if iommu_platform is requested, but
> > unsupported")
> > Cc: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
> > Cc: qemu-stable@nongnu.org
> > 
> > ---
> > 
> > @Kevin: Can you please verify, that I don't break your fix?  
> 
> So which configurations did you test for this?

I tested it with virtio-fs and qemu-system-s390x with -device
vhost-user-fs-ccw,iommu_platform=on,...

Regards,
Halil

> 
> > ---
> >  hw/virtio/virtio-bus.c | 11 ++++++-----
> >  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/hw/virtio/virtio-bus.c b/hw/virtio/virtio-bus.c
> > index d23db98c56..c1578f3de2 100644
> > --- a/hw/virtio/virtio-bus.c
> > +++ b/hw/virtio/virtio-bus.c
> > @@ -69,11 +69,6 @@ void virtio_bus_device_plugged(VirtIODevice *vdev, Error **errp)
> >          return;
> >      }
> >  
> > -    if (has_iommu && !virtio_host_has_feature(vdev, VIRTIO_F_IOMMU_PLATFORM)) {
> > -        error_setg(errp, "iommu_platform=true is not supported by the device");
> > -        return;
> > -    }
> > -
> >      if (klass->device_plugged != NULL) {
> >          klass->device_plugged(qbus->parent, &local_err);
> >      }
> > @@ -88,6 +83,12 @@ void virtio_bus_device_plugged(VirtIODevice *vdev, Error **errp)
> >      } else {
> >          vdev->dma_as = &address_space_memory;
> >      }
> > +
> > +    if (has_iommu && vdev->dma_as != &address_space_memory
> > +                  && !virtio_host_has_feature(vdev, VIRTIO_F_IOMMU_PLATFORM)) {
> > +        error_setg(errp, "iommu_platform=true is not supported by the device");
> > +        return;
> > +    }
> >  }
> >  /* Reset the virtio_bus */
> > 
> > base-commit: f8d75e10d3e0033a0a29a7a7e4777a4fbc17a016
> > -- 
> > 2.32.0  
> 
> 



  reply	other threads:[~2022-01-13 20:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-01-13 16:51 [PATCH 1/1] virtio: fix the condition for iommu_platform not supported Halil Pasic
2022-01-13 17:11 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2022-01-13 19:54   ` Halil Pasic [this message]
2022-01-14 16:05     ` Halil Pasic
2022-01-14 18:07       ` Michael S. Tsirkin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220113205452.4443ee4e.pasic@linux.ibm.com \
    --to=pasic@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=Jakob.Naucke@ibm.com \
    --cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
    --cc=mst@redhat.com \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=qemu-stable@nongnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).