Re: [PATCH v13 06/10] ACPI ERST: build the ACPI ERST table

["Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>]

On Tue, Jan 25, 2022 at 10:24:49AM -0600, Eric DeVolder wrote:
> And here is what the main snippet looks like with the above changes (a diff
> is quite messy):
> 
>     /*
>      * Macros for use with construction of the action instructions
>      */
> #define BUILD_READ_VALUE(width_in_bits) \
>     build_serialization_instruction_entry(table_instruction_data, \
>         action, INST_READ_REGISTER, 0, width_in_bits, \
>         bar0 + ERST_VALUE_OFFSET, 0)
> 
> #define BUILD_READ_VALUE_VALUE(width_in_bits, value) \
>     build_serialization_instruction_entry(table_instruction_data, \
>         action, INST_READ_REGISTER_VALUE, 0, width_in_bits, \
>         bar0 + ERST_VALUE_OFFSET, value)
> 
> #define BUILD_WRITE_REGISTER(width_in_bits, reg, value) \
>     build_serialization_instruction_entry(table_instruction_data, \
>         action, INST_WRITE_REGISTER, 0, width_in_bits, \
>         bar0 + reg, value)
> 
> #define BUILD_WRITE_REGISTER_VALUE(width_in_bits, reg, value) \
>     build_serialization_instruction_entry(table_instruction_data, \
>         action, INST_WRITE_REGISTER_VALUE, 0, width_in_bits, \
>         bar0 + reg, value)

Please, don't hide variable accesses in macros like that.
whatever is accessed should be part of a parameter.

-- 
MST