From: Pierre Morel <pmorel@linux.ibm.com>
To: qemu-s390x@nongnu.org
Cc: thuth@redhat.com, seiden@linux.ibm.com, nrb@linux.ibm.com,
ehabkost@redhat.com, kvm@vger.kernel.org, david@redhat.com,
eblake@redhat.com, cohuck@redhat.com,
richard.henderson@linaro.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org,
armbru@redhat.com, pasic@linux.ibm.com, borntraeger@de.ibm.com,
mst@redhat.com, pbonzini@redhat.com, philmd@redhat.com
Subject: [PATCH v6 10/11] s390x: topology: implementing numa for the s390x topology
Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2022 14:41:24 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220217134125.132150-11-pmorel@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220217134125.132150-1-pmorel@linux.ibm.com>
S390x CPU Topology allows a non uniform repartition of the CPU
inside the topology containers, sockets, books and drawers.
We use numa to place the CPU inside the right topology container
and report the non uniform topology to the guest.
Note that s390x needs CPU0 to belong to the topology and consequently
all topology must include CPU0.
We accept a partial QEMU numa definition, in that case undefined CPUs
are added to free slots in the topology starting with slot 0 and going
up.
Signed-off-by: Pierre Morel <pmorel@linux.ibm.com>
---
hw/core/machine.c | 18 ++++++++++
hw/s390x/s390-virtio-ccw.c | 68 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
2 files changed, 79 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/hw/core/machine.c b/hw/core/machine.c
index 1db55e36c8..ee719965f7 100644
--- a/hw/core/machine.c
+++ b/hw/core/machine.c
@@ -687,6 +687,16 @@ void machine_set_cpu_numa_node(MachineState *machine,
return;
}
+ if (props->has_book_id && !slot->props.has_book_id) {
+ error_setg(errp, "book-id is not supported");
+ return;
+ }
+
+ if (props->has_drawer_id && !slot->props.has_drawer_id) {
+ error_setg(errp, "drawer-id is not supported");
+ return;
+ }
+
/* skip slots with explicit mismatch */
if (props->has_thread_id && props->thread_id != slot->props.thread_id) {
continue;
@@ -704,6 +714,14 @@ void machine_set_cpu_numa_node(MachineState *machine,
continue;
}
+ if (props->has_book_id && props->book_id != slot->props.book_id) {
+ continue;
+ }
+
+ if (props->has_drawer_id && props->drawer_id != slot->props.drawer_id) {
+ continue;
+ }
+
/* reject assignment if slot is already assigned, for compatibility
* of legacy cpu_index mapping with SPAPR core based mapping do not
* error out if cpu thread and matched core have the same node-id */
diff --git a/hw/s390x/s390-virtio-ccw.c b/hw/s390x/s390-virtio-ccw.c
index 03829e90b3..b50c304796 100644
--- a/hw/s390x/s390-virtio-ccw.c
+++ b/hw/s390x/s390-virtio-ccw.c
@@ -84,14 +84,34 @@ out:
static void s390_init_cpus(MachineState *machine)
{
MachineClass *mc = MACHINE_GET_CLASS(machine);
- int i;
+ CPUArchId *slot;
+ int i, n = 0;
/* initialize possible_cpus */
mc->possible_cpu_arch_ids(machine);
s390_topology_setup(machine);
- for (i = 0; i < machine->smp.cpus; i++) {
+
+ /* For NUMA configuration create defined nodes */
+ if (machine->numa_state->num_nodes) {
+ for (i = 0; i < machine->smp.max_cpus; i++) {
+ slot = &machine->possible_cpus->cpus[i];
+ if (slot->arch_id != -1 && n < machine->smp.cpus) {
+ s390x_new_cpu(machine->cpu_type, i, &error_fatal);
+ n++;
+ }
+ }
+ }
+
+ /* create all remaining CPUs */
+ for (i = 0; n < machine->smp.cpus && i < machine->smp.max_cpus; i++) {
+ slot = &machine->possible_cpus->cpus[i];
+ /* For NUMA configuration skip defined nodes */
+ if (machine->numa_state->num_nodes && slot->arch_id != -1) {
+ continue;
+ }
s390x_new_cpu(machine->cpu_type, i, &error_fatal);
+ n++;
}
}
@@ -274,6 +294,11 @@ static void ccw_init(MachineState *machine)
/* register hypercalls */
virtio_ccw_register_hcalls();
+ /* CPU0 must exist on S390x */
+ if (!s390_cpu_addr2state(0)) {
+ error_printf("Core_id 0 must be defined in the CPU configuration\n");
+ exit(1);
+ }
s390_enable_css_support(s390_cpu_addr2state(0));
ret = css_create_css_image(VIRTUAL_CSSID, true);
@@ -306,6 +331,7 @@ static void s390_cpu_plug(HotplugHandler *hotplug_dev,
g_assert(!ms->possible_cpus->cpus[cpu->env.core_id].cpu);
ms->possible_cpus->cpus[cpu->env.core_id].cpu = OBJECT(dev);
+ ms->possible_cpus->cpus[cpu->env.core_id].arch_id = cpu->env.core_id;
s390_topology_new_cpu(cpu->env.core_id);
@@ -579,7 +605,9 @@ static CpuInstanceProperties s390_cpu_index_to_props(MachineState *ms,
static const CPUArchIdList *s390_possible_cpu_arch_ids(MachineState *ms)
{
int i;
+ int drawer_id, book_id, socket_id;
unsigned int max_cpus = ms->smp.max_cpus;
+ CPUArchId *slot;
if (ms->possible_cpus) {
g_assert(ms->possible_cpus && ms->possible_cpus->len == max_cpus);
@@ -590,11 +618,25 @@ static const CPUArchIdList *s390_possible_cpu_arch_ids(MachineState *ms)
sizeof(CPUArchId) * max_cpus);
ms->possible_cpus->len = max_cpus;
for (i = 0; i < ms->possible_cpus->len; i++) {
- ms->possible_cpus->cpus[i].type = ms->cpu_type;
- ms->possible_cpus->cpus[i].vcpus_count = 1;
- ms->possible_cpus->cpus[i].arch_id = i;
- ms->possible_cpus->cpus[i].props.has_core_id = true;
- ms->possible_cpus->cpus[i].props.core_id = i;
+ slot = &ms->possible_cpus->cpus[i];
+
+ slot->type = ms->cpu_type;
+ slot->vcpus_count = 1;
+ slot->arch_id = i;
+ slot->props.has_core_id = true;
+ slot->props.core_id = i;
+
+ socket_id = i / ms->smp.cores;
+ slot->props.socket_id = socket_id;
+ slot->props.has_socket_id = true;
+
+ book_id = socket_id / ms->smp.sockets;
+ slot->props.book_id = book_id;
+ slot->props.has_book_id = true;
+
+ drawer_id = book_id / ms->smp.books;
+ slot->props.drawer_id = drawer_id;
+ slot->props.has_drawer_id = true;
}
return ms->possible_cpus;
@@ -636,6 +678,17 @@ static ram_addr_t s390_fixup_ram_size(ram_addr_t sz)
return newsz;
}
+/*
+ * S390 defines CPU topology level 2 as the level for which a change in topology
+ * is worth being taking care of.
+ * Let use level 2, socket, as the numa node.
+ */
+static int64_t s390_get_default_cpu_node_id(const MachineState *ms, int idx)
+{
+ ms->possible_cpus->cpus[idx].arch_id = -1;
+ return idx / ms->smp.cores;
+}
+
static void ccw_machine_class_init(ObjectClass *oc, void *data)
{
MachineClass *mc = MACHINE_CLASS(oc);
@@ -668,6 +721,7 @@ static void ccw_machine_class_init(ObjectClass *oc, void *data)
mc->default_ram_id = "s390.ram";
mc->smp_props.books_supported = true;
mc->smp_props.drawers_supported = true;
+ mc->get_default_cpu_node_id = s390_get_default_cpu_node_id;
}
static inline bool machine_get_aes_key_wrap(Object *obj, Error **errp)
--
2.27.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-02-17 14:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-02-17 13:41 [PATCH v6 00/11] s390x: CPU Topology Pierre Morel
2022-02-17 13:41 ` [PATCH v6 01/11] s390x: SCLP: reporting the maximum nested topology entries Pierre Morel
2022-02-17 13:41 ` [PATCH v6 02/11] s390x: topology: CPU topology objects and structures Pierre Morel
2022-02-17 13:41 ` [PATCH v6 03/11] s390x: topology: implementating Store Topology System Information Pierre Morel
2022-02-17 13:41 ` [PATCH v6 04/11] s390x: CPU topology: CPU topology migration Pierre Morel
2022-02-17 13:41 ` [PATCH v6 05/11] s390x: kvm: topology: interception of PTF instruction Pierre Morel
2022-02-17 13:41 ` [PATCH v6 06/11] s390x: topology: Adding books to CPU topology Pierre Morel
2022-03-16 3:54 ` wangyanan (Y) via
2022-02-17 13:41 ` [PATCH v6 07/11] s390x: topology: Adding books to STSI Pierre Morel
2022-02-17 13:41 ` [PATCH v6 08/11] s390x: topology: Adding drawers to CPU topology Pierre Morel
2022-02-17 14:20 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2022-02-17 15:30 ` Pierre Morel
2022-02-17 15:32 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2022-02-17 15:50 ` Pierre Morel
2022-03-16 6:50 ` wangyanan (Y) via
2022-02-17 13:41 ` [PATCH v6 09/11] s390x: topology: Adding drawers to STSI Pierre Morel
2022-02-17 13:41 ` Pierre Morel [this message]
2022-02-17 13:41 ` [PATCH v6 11/11] s390x: topology: documentation Pierre Morel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220217134125.132150-11-pmorel@linux.ibm.com \
--to=pmorel@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=armbru@redhat.com \
--cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
--cc=cohuck@redhat.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=eblake@redhat.com \
--cc=ehabkost@redhat.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=nrb@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=pasic@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=philmd@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-s390x@nongnu.org \
--cc=richard.henderson@linaro.org \
--cc=seiden@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=thuth@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).